Annabel bec

This is the problem with @voEROSttv and being a passive aggressive retweet queen. He likes to try and spin it so that it appears he has taken accountability but the mean old community won’t allow that to be enough. This is entirely not true. He has made vague statements such as he is human, and he has put forth occasional retweets that reference the fragility of humanity and human choices. However, accountability is saying I did this, and I own up to it. Once that has been done then everyone would be more than happy to move on (I know I would have fulfilled my goal). However, has Albert ever: Admitted he sexted women without their permission or after being told to stop? Admitted he told women who they could and could not friend? Admitted he filed a frivolous lawsuit to gain highly personal information of women who upset him? Admitted that he sent women out to watch others and attain as much information on them as possible? That is just a few of MANY! Take real accountability, Albert. Do that and I don’t think anyone will complain. However, this vague retweeting because you want the absolution without the act simply is pathetic.

This was passed on to me by someone. It appears to be ANOTHER person who came out of Albert’s community and wants to spread awareness of the problematic behavior. I encourage all to investigate with an open mind. Another one, @voEROSttv

Do you want MORE proof Albert Francis Vanderwall Jr. speaks out of both sides of his mouth and actually has zEro morals? Remember how he is so anti AI despite paying his blue checkmark? He also blatantly uses it on his website. Nice one, @voEROSttv

@DanielleSm55791 🤣

So Albert, you say you have been shadowbanned. However, why is it that you simply refuse to acknowledge that when you have dozens and dozens of women independently noting how you did disgusting things without their permission, had an impact on your following? The simple fact is that people found out who the real @voEROSttv is, and made a decision. Outside of a small number of people who simply stand by you for some reason that most of us can’t fathom, the general consensus is that abusers, whiners, manipulators, and vengeful people are not worth exposure on social media. It is that simple.

@DanielleSm55791 @voEROSttv I could not agree more. Give to a worthy cause.

I do see gifts to @voEROSttv that finance his work free lifestyle. Since the inner circle and those close by have been outed long ago, it’s easy to see that the donations primarily come from the late 30s to age 50 female sub group that he does not harass for nudes, etc. He saves that treatment for the much younger demographic. The demographic who fall into that time where we all so desperately want to be seen as adults that we don’t identify what is clearly gross grooming from a male over 40. To those donating, why not just donate that money to a real charity, and not some charity case of a drunken, drug addled, groomer? If you really do believe he doesn’t need donations, what would it hurt to help real causes?

@DanielleSm55791 @voEROSttv It does seem silly to try and make those two things match up.

Hey, @voEROSttv. If you are telling everyone they should hate AI more, why do you keep paying for that blue checkmark? Much like most about you, the hypocrisy is astounding. Is it because, and I quote something rather telling from your past, you won’t deny yourself?

We are seeing drops again. Always good to know we have 100 safer women from @voEROSttv

A random post about @voEROSttv. For every person that sees a post and ends up out, it is work worth it. Please do not support abusers. Please do not finance a lazy, middle aged groomer.

@DanielleSm55791 @voEROSttv Who is he to talk?

Hey, Albert- Did you get upset when something was pointed out? That isn’t something you do frequently is it, @voEROSttv?

Enmeshment: A condition in which two or more people, typically family members, are involved in each other’s activities & personal relationships to an excessive degree, thus limiting or precluding healthy interaction & compromising individual autonomy & identity.

I ended up half addressing this in a reply, but it needs to be stated because randomly new people discover my threads. Albert, known online as @voEROSttv absolutely has a long history of pressuring women to nudes and intimate chat. Don’t fall for the performative posts, there are many women who have spoken up about it. It’s what ruined the career he tried for, not other people.

This is an example of talking out of both sides of your mouth, @voEROSttv. To condemn a community, but not long ago crawling back to them for work because the minor success you had during a COVID lockdown has completely disappeared. You even pinned a TikTok begging for narration work, then removed it when absolutely nobody bit. Now you go back to attacking BookTok. You will lie, you will suck up to those who can help you. You ARE a groomer. You ARE an abuser. You contributed to the drama years ago by abusing and attacking women MULTIPLE times, you hypocritical vertically challenged liar.

@DanielleSm55791 @voEROSttv Its not wrong....

Here is a delight someone sent me. This is what appears when VoEROS is searched on TikTok. Sorry, @voEROSttv, this is an AI generated summary. Do you extra hate it because it also calls your behavior out?

I have decided to join in and post in a more forward way. I refuse to stay afraid. This is what @voEROSttv demanded from this platform when women didn’t do as they were told. Please think about the depth of this demand. Sometimes we brush it off. Please take this in and share.

Is there anyone on here that was part of the @voEROSttv Discord when he was telling girls and women that they didn’t have to pay because they weren’t like everyone else? It was if he felt you might engage in his advances.

There appears to be some misconception from many of @voEROSttv following about who I might be. I think it only fair to clear it up. I was never someone involved in any sort of relationship, romantic or otherwise with him. We have never interacted in a close manner. I never lusted after him or his attention. This is important to say as I have received interactions here and private anonymous account messages alluding to this, as well as very sad retweets from the groomer himself. This was never a factor in my motivation. I am not an alternative account to women he has attacked in the past. I am not someone you know. Unlike some of his loyal few, I am not a failed aspiring author. I am not someone who was close to him and was rejected, and I am not someone who wanted to be close to him as was rejected. My information has all come from people who were involved with him and left or who ARE still involved and wanted to share. I have never once shared anything without a person’s absolute permission. I do what I do because hE refused and refuses to be honest about what hE has done. Saying we are all human is not admitting to the specifics. I swear on the lives of every single person I care about, and my own life, that all of my statements here are 100% true. My motivation is that I don’t believe abusers and groomers should be allowed to sweep egregious actions under the rug and not address them directly and specifically. Now….. Can hE say the same about: He has never pressured a woman into sexual talk or actions? He has never told people to attack those he does not like? He has never told women to do things he knows is bad for them but good for him? He has never made threats, subtle or direct to women to keep their mouths closed or husbands and boyfriends might find out things they would not like? He has never told women to I note boyfriends and husbands when he is making sexual advances? He has never used his patron platform to gather information on women for ANY purpose that serves him? He has never told people to boycott or harm the reputation of competitors or those he doesn’t like? Let’s start here, shall we? All I have asked is that you be honest instead of making vague posts that we are all human. Your failing, if we generously call them that, are very specific, Albert. Can you make that promise?

Calling out “chronically online people”, Mr. Vanderwall? Jesus, Albert. How the fuck did you make it beyond the age of 40 and still be this tone deaf and stupid?