Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson
1K posts

Rebecca Dyson
@becdyo
she/her 🏳️🌈 Research Ethics & Integrity @Uni_Newcastle || & Translational Physiologist @ctpUOW Passionate about good research, done well! Views are my own 😘
Newcastle, NSW Katılım Eylül 2009
614 Takip Edilen203 Takipçiler
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

Arguably our lab’s biggest publication, however that is defined! We show that heat exposure: 1) nearly doubles myocardial blood flow and 2) can cause myocardial ischemia in adults with coronary artery disease. @AnnalsofIM: acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

That paper no one could stop talking about for 24 hours (scienceintegritydigest.com/2024/02/15/the…) has been retracted.
frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…

English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

New in @JPhysiol by @HEPRU_uOttawa: Hormonal intrauterine devices and heat exchange during exercise 👏
physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

I'm in my 4th year of #PhD, worked in different labs around the world, heard from several postdocs, PhDs and UG's...
Dear supervisors, here are my suggestions to make your research lab a better place & attract talent!
@PhDVoice
@PhD_Genie @AcademicChatter
@AcademicDilemma
English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

📣Exciting news! @juliemidtgaard, @MichaelRathleff and I are thrilled to introduce the “Excellence and Kindness in Research Training (ELIS)” initiative. This is a new approach to academic mentorship combining excellence with kindness. More info 👉 shorturl.at/eoDMY

English

@SJEllery_PhD Well done @SJEllery_PhD 🥳 so well deserved! We are in the lab right now cooking you up some hot results!
English

Incredibly humbled to receive an #NHMRC EL2 to translate our studies on dietary creatine supplementation during pregnancy & employ exciting new technologies to explore bioenergetics in reproduction. It takes a village! Sincere thanks to all who are supporting me.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research@Hudson_Research
Congratulations to this year's recipients of NHMRC Investigator grants!🥳 Exciting research projects covering healthier pregnancy, safer birth & new forms of cancer treatment have attracted funding totalling almost $7.5m over the next 5 years. Read more bit.ly/3v4HTB4
English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

Someone suggested to me instead of referring to a paper as "Smith et al"
it should be "Smith et pals" and this is a hill I am willing to die on
#AcademicChatter
English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

Not enough people know about bioicons.com
Open source vector graphics. Free alternatives to BioRender.

English
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi
Rebecca Dyson retweetledi

Garbage papers are produced not by bad scientists.
It's the metrics-focused evaluation that creates them.
Can you imagine 400,000 fake research papers?
- 70,000 of them was published last year. This is 2% of ALL papers in 2023.
- Paper mills produce huge number of papers at speed and have special templates for that.
- For most journals, 2% come from paper mills. But for some, it is a whooping 40%.
And this is the lower boundary, according to Adam Day (director of scholarly data-services company Clear Skies). His software only sees paper mills that have a known template.
▫️
Paper mills feed on the existing reward system in academia. When everyone looks at citations and number of papers, some people turn to paper mills to become ‘successful’.
▫️
I see many scientists who:
- produce meaningless research.
- boast about the NUMBER of papers they publish per year
- and feel anxiety when they produce fewer papers/year than before
▫️
What can we do?
- Stop using the number of papers to measure success (it is used in many countries, including the EU)
- Stop giving grants based on the number of citations, awards and invited talks
- Include new criteria such as community service/contribution, publishing of codes, participation in committees, etc. Give them a big share of the total score.
- Include the “depth of research” as a crucial factor (reviewers should provide a thorough feedback on this).
▫️
#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #researchpaper

English






