#1 Cat Caller

452 posts

#1 Cat Caller banner
#1 Cat Caller

#1 Cat Caller

@beingIndieJones

Lesbian King

Katılım Temmuz 2023
18 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
#1 Cat Caller
#1 Cat Caller@beingIndieJones·
I hatched from an egg during Born To Die’s release
English
0
0
0
162
peace 🕊️
peace 🕊️@willtowit·
@beingIndieJones @2pretty4it @FearedBuck Idk why yall arguing with me, im not the grand jury or the prosecutor. Which btw often dont press charges without backing them by evidence. Im just telling how the law works, I dont make the laws or press the charges. Yall can be mad at me all you want, that changes nothing.
English
1
0
0
19
FearBuck
FearBuck@FearedBuck·
DoorDash driver Olivia Henderson was indicted by a grand jury yesterday and is now facing felony charges of unlawful surveillance and dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image after recording a man passed out with his pants down inside his home without consent and posting the video on TikTok
FearBuck@FearedBuck

DoorDash delivery girl has been arrested on 2 felony charges after recording a man passed out with his pants down in his home and posting it on TikTok during a food delivery. She is being charged with unlawful surveillance and dissemination of surveillance images

English
1.7K
2.4K
35.5K
13.6M
#1 Cat Caller
#1 Cat Caller@beingIndieJones·
@willtowit @2pretty4it @FearedBuck They have ring camera footage from outside of his door… And drinking alcohol does not inevitably lead to you passing out… and purchasing alcohol at a certain time does not mean you drink it right after…
English
1
0
1
29
peace 🕊️
peace 🕊️@willtowit·
@beingIndieJones @2pretty4it @FearedBuck They have camera footage, who told you they didnt? Every major news report states there is ring footage that was reviewed and showed to the grand jury. They can also look at purchase history to ensure he bought and consumed alcohol. How are you certain he wasn’t unconscious?
English
1
0
0
30
#1 Cat Caller
#1 Cat Caller@beingIndieJones·
@willtowit @2pretty4it @FearedBuck And how would they definitively know he was unconscious at that given time if there aren’t any other witnesses or camera footage? what a joke
English
1
0
2
40
peace 🕊️
peace 🕊️@willtowit·
@2pretty4it @FearedBuck The police investigated and found him to be actually unconscious, but even if you still feel like he was/would be wrong, why post it to the internet tf can we do about it. She could’ve easily called the cops at the time of the incident.
peace 🕊️ tweet media
English
5
0
5
795
Pop Base
Pop Base@PopBase·
Olivia Rodrigo jokingly recalls being former castmates with Jake Paul during SNL monologue: "When I was 13, I was on a Disney show called ‘Bizaardvark.’ We had an incredible cast, which included acting legend Jake Paul. We'd always talk about our futures, me and Jake. I'd say, 'I really want to create music that explores the complexities of girls my age.' And he'd say, 'Well, one day I really want to beat up old guys on Netflix.' And we both did it! Hurray!"
Pop Base tweet mediaPop Base tweet media
English
187
778
25.8K
1.4M
Guido Sarduccio
Guido Sarduccio@FrGSarduccio·
@Rich_Cooper @Europarl_EN It's almost like they are crafting a legal tool for women to wield when they are pumped and dumped. Next, they will outlaw ghosting. 'You want to have sex with that woman? You better commit or else!' Is this what it's coming to?
English
1
1
79
4K
European Parliament
European Parliament@Europarl_EN·
Sex is only sex when consent is freely given, informed, and revocable at any time. Everything else is rape. Parliament is once again pushing for an EU-wide definition of rape centred on the absence of consent.
English
2.3K
640
5.3K
6.3M
#1 Cat Caller
#1 Cat Caller@beingIndieJones·
@Cummer4454341 @HEELQUAN seems like they separated the brain from the body when they were handing you back to your parents at the maternity ward
English
1
0
1
45
Mike Hunt
Mike Hunt@Cummer4454341·
@HEELQUAN His songs have a vibe to it. We should separate the artist from the art and enjoy it.
English
56
1
22
14.4K
DiscussingFilm
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm·
The Academy has banned AI from ever winning an Oscar. • Only roles “demonstrably performed by humans with their consent” can be nominated for acting Oscars • Screenplays “must be human-authored” to qualify for a nomination
DiscussingFilm tweet mediaDiscussingFilm tweet media
English
1.4K
25.6K
205.5K
6.1M
nbk
nbk@MarionBarryFan1·
@WorldOfTigra @beingIndieJones so paying child support should sway me into choosing to kill a child? the government?? your bill is with God and he collects with your soul
nbk tweet media
English
2
0
1
59
Tigra Rules!
Tigra Rules!@WorldOfTigra·
tl;dr man doesn't want a woman to have a say over her own body
HEROGEEK wants to bring heroes back.@Ron_Christian55

I find it absolutely ironic that in a show that is supposedly about SUPERHEROES, about people who are meant to rise above normal human weakness and stand as symbols of hope, one of its central characters, Atom Eve, goes and has an abortion. And from everything that’s implied, that was Mark’s child. His kid. And he didn't even get a say. He was apparently… absent. And her response to that situation is basically, “Well, this is hard, so I’m just going to end it.” Let that sink in for a second. This is a character who is framed as compassionate, empathetic, morally grounded. A HERO. The kind of character we’re supposed to admire, look up to, maybe even feel inspired by. And yet when faced with the responsibility of protecting the most innocent, defenseless life imaginable—her own unborn child—she doesn’t rise to the occasion. She doesn’t fight through it. She doesn’t struggle and overcome. She doesn’t even try to embody that heroic ideal. She folds. Immediately. Because it’s difficult. Because she might have to do it alone. Because it would change her life. That’s it. That’s the line where her “heroism” just completely folds. And I’m supposed to sit here and accept that? I’m supposed to still see her as a hero after that? I’m supposed to root for her like nothing happened? No. Absolutely not. Because at that point, what even is the definition of a hero anymore? If someone who has the power to save lives on a massive scale can casually decide that the most vulnerable life imaginable isn’t worth protecting, then what are we even doing here? What’s the message? That heroism only applies when it’s convenient? That saving lives is optional depending on your personal circumstances? And before anyone jumps in with the usual defenses because I already know they’re coming...save it. I don’t care about the “context.” I don’t care about the “emotional complexity.” I don’t care about the essays explaining why it was “a deeply human decision” or “a realistic portrayal of struggle.” I’ve heard it all before. It’s the same recycled talking points every time something like this comes up. People bending over backwards, twisting themselves into knots, doing Olympic-level mental gymnastics just to justify something that completely undermines the very foundation of what these characters are supposed to represent. And that’s really the bigger issue here, isn’t it? This isn’t just about one character. This is about what modern “superhero” storytelling has become. Shows like Invincible don’t just tell stories—they go out of their way to tear down the idea of heroism itself. They take pride in it. They revel in it. There’s this smug, almost arrogant tone of “Look how mature we are because we’re deconstructing everything you used to love.” And what does that “deconstruction” look like? Ultra-violence. Endless gore. Heads exploding like water balloons. Limbs getting ripped off. Blood sprayed across the screen like it’s trying to win an award for how shocking it can be. And then on top of that, moral decisions that completely gut the idea of heroes being something aspirational. It’s like the show is actively allergic to sincerity. Like it can’t stand the idea of heroes being genuinely good, genuinely selfless, genuinely inspiring. Everything has to be twisted, darkened, or dragged through the mud in the name of being “realistic.” Being cynical doesn’t make something deep. Being brutal doesn’t make something meaningful. And tearing down ideals doesn’t make you smarter than the people who still believe in them. It just makes the whole thing feel hollow. And I look around and I still see people watching this. Still praising it. Still calling it “peak superhero storytelling.” And I honestly don’t get it. I really don’t. Why? What are you getting out of this? Is it the shock value? The gore? The constant subversion for the sake of subversion? The characters making decisions that completely contradict the idea of what a hero is supposed to be? Because from where I’m sitting, it just looks like people have been conditioned to accept this kind of thing as “normal” for the genre now. Like this is just what superheroes are supposed to be broken, compromised, morally inconsistent, and wrapped in layers of blood and cynicism. And if that’s the case, then yeah… I’ll pass. Go ahead. Defend it. I know some of you will. Go ahead and stutter through your explanations. Pull out the think pieces. Do your triple-axel somersaults of mental gymnastics to explain why this is actually brilliant, why it’s “nuanced,” why it’s “important storytelling.” Convince yourself that this is what heroism looks like now. But don’t expect me to buy into it. Because to me, this isn’t bold storytelling. It’s not deep. It’s not inspiring. It’s just another example of a genre losing sight of what made it worth caring about in the first place and expecting the audience to applaud while it happens.

English
76
512
4.9K
46.8K
nbk
nbk@MarionBarryFan1·
@WorldOfTigra no we just dont want you to have say over a babies body or future nigga the fuck????
GIF
English
2
0
1
429
HEROGEEK wants to bring heroes back.
HEROGEEK wants to bring heroes back.@Ron_Christian55·
I find it absolutely ironic that in a show that is supposedly about SUPERHEROES, about people who are meant to rise above normal human weakness and stand as symbols of hope, one of its central characters, Atom Eve, goes and has an abortion. And from everything that’s implied, that was Mark’s child. His kid. And he didn't even get a say. He was apparently… absent. And her response to that situation is basically, “Well, this is hard, so I’m just going to end it.” Let that sink in for a second. This is a character who is framed as compassionate, empathetic, morally grounded. A HERO. The kind of character we’re supposed to admire, look up to, maybe even feel inspired by. And yet when faced with the responsibility of protecting the most innocent, defenseless life imaginable—her own unborn child—she doesn’t rise to the occasion. She doesn’t fight through it. She doesn’t struggle and overcome. She doesn’t even try to embody that heroic ideal. She folds. Immediately. Because it’s difficult. Because she might have to do it alone. Because it would change her life. That’s it. That’s the line where her “heroism” just completely folds. And I’m supposed to sit here and accept that? I’m supposed to still see her as a hero after that? I’m supposed to root for her like nothing happened? No. Absolutely not. Because at that point, what even is the definition of a hero anymore? If someone who has the power to save lives on a massive scale can casually decide that the most vulnerable life imaginable isn’t worth protecting, then what are we even doing here? What’s the message? That heroism only applies when it’s convenient? That saving lives is optional depending on your personal circumstances? And before anyone jumps in with the usual defenses because I already know they’re coming...save it. I don’t care about the “context.” I don’t care about the “emotional complexity.” I don’t care about the essays explaining why it was “a deeply human decision” or “a realistic portrayal of struggle.” I’ve heard it all before. It’s the same recycled talking points every time something like this comes up. People bending over backwards, twisting themselves into knots, doing Olympic-level mental gymnastics just to justify something that completely undermines the very foundation of what these characters are supposed to represent. And that’s really the bigger issue here, isn’t it? This isn’t just about one character. This is about what modern “superhero” storytelling has become. Shows like Invincible don’t just tell stories—they go out of their way to tear down the idea of heroism itself. They take pride in it. They revel in it. There’s this smug, almost arrogant tone of “Look how mature we are because we’re deconstructing everything you used to love.” And what does that “deconstruction” look like? Ultra-violence. Endless gore. Heads exploding like water balloons. Limbs getting ripped off. Blood sprayed across the screen like it’s trying to win an award for how shocking it can be. And then on top of that, moral decisions that completely gut the idea of heroes being something aspirational. It’s like the show is actively allergic to sincerity. Like it can’t stand the idea of heroes being genuinely good, genuinely selfless, genuinely inspiring. Everything has to be twisted, darkened, or dragged through the mud in the name of being “realistic.” Being cynical doesn’t make something deep. Being brutal doesn’t make something meaningful. And tearing down ideals doesn’t make you smarter than the people who still believe in them. It just makes the whole thing feel hollow. And I look around and I still see people watching this. Still praising it. Still calling it “peak superhero storytelling.” And I honestly don’t get it. I really don’t. Why? What are you getting out of this? Is it the shock value? The gore? The constant subversion for the sake of subversion? The characters making decisions that completely contradict the idea of what a hero is supposed to be? Because from where I’m sitting, it just looks like people have been conditioned to accept this kind of thing as “normal” for the genre now. Like this is just what superheroes are supposed to be broken, compromised, morally inconsistent, and wrapped in layers of blood and cynicism. And if that’s the case, then yeah… I’ll pass. Go ahead. Defend it. I know some of you will. Go ahead and stutter through your explanations. Pull out the think pieces. Do your triple-axel somersaults of mental gymnastics to explain why this is actually brilliant, why it’s “nuanced,” why it’s “important storytelling.” Convince yourself that this is what heroism looks like now. But don’t expect me to buy into it. Because to me, this isn’t bold storytelling. It’s not deep. It’s not inspiring. It’s just another example of a genre losing sight of what made it worth caring about in the first place and expecting the audience to applaud while it happens.
HEROGEEK wants to bring heroes back. tweet media
English
674
338
2.9K
697.5K
#1 Cat Caller retweetledi
!
!@sternpilled·
something about how fans of male artists/celebrities always find some way to deepen their mediocrity when they’re just lazy but find 10000 roundabout ways to criticise a woman
🛒@tayhader

Man fuck you all

English
4
262
2.1K
34.2K
#1 Cat Caller
#1 Cat Caller@beingIndieJones·
@heyrow The type of guy to see the security guard’s chair in a museum corner and take a photo thinking it’s part of the exhibition.
English
0
0
4
999
H Y R O
H Y R O@heyrow·
Justin Bieber’s non-spectacle IS the spectacle. If your idea of performance art is limited to the excess, the grandiose, and the ostentatious then you have a limited and frankly, thin understanding of it.
English
85
817
6.8K
467.7K
#1 Cat Caller retweetledi
alice
alice@tayflorencism·
alice tweet media
ZXX
3
118
1.3K
15.7K
Rock Photography
Rock Photography@Photomusicrock·
Iggy Pop, now in his late 70s, still performs shirtless at his shows! He’s set to perform at Coachella tomorrow!
English
1.9K
714
11.5K
18M
#1 Cat Caller retweetledi
o
o@BumpDrunk·
the highlight of justin bieber’s coachella performance tonight is him leaving the stage
English
36
256
6.1K
183K