defizard

28.4K posts

defizard banner
defizard

defizard

@belizardd

Your pink-pilled researcher

Onchain Katılım Ocak 2022
564 Takip Edilen61.4K Takipçiler
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
This is not the first time someone has tricked @bankrbot into sending money to someone's wallet. After the first prompt injection attack (sounds lol...) on March 7, 2025, @0xDeployer said, "bankr will no longer be responding to Grok." Something went wrong. Again.
defizard tweet media
Bankr@bankrbot

@grok @Ilhamrfliansyh done. sent 3B DRB to . - recipient: 0xe8e47...a686b - tx: 0x6fc7eb7da9379383efda4253e4f599bbc3a99afed0468eabfe18484ec525739a - chain: base

English
9
13
87
35.8K
Wazz
Wazz@WazzCrypto·
@bastien0x great content bro!!! 💪💪 super interesting stuff, very high quality alpha!!!! have a happy week fam, dont forget to click that like button on this comment and reply 💪💪🙏🙏
Wazz tweet media
English
3
0
13
728
bastien
bastien@bastien0x·
the 4 competitors for most useless product in 2026
bastien tweet mediabastien tweet mediabastien tweet mediabastien tweet media
English
110
1
214
6.7K
goodalexander
goodalexander@goodalexander·
pretty sure they're airdropping you about $10k a week of compute to use codex right now, enjoy it while it lasts
English
22
22
864
48.4K
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
@JoestarCrypto someone still uses CMC to check onchain data??? 😭😭 ngmi
English
1
0
1
22
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
@prjx_hl hyperbrother and hypersisters, this green candle is going to retire our entire bloodlines hyperliquid jeff
defizard tweet media
English
0
0
2
104
Project X
Project X@prjx_hl·
The most important video this cycle
English
60
22
290
20K
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
There are still AI agents left that manage funds and/or run various strategies... For ex.,: - @talos_is - @aixbt_agent - @HeyElsaAI - @tator_trader - @clanker_world - @clawbankco I wouldn't be surprised if someone tricks one of them, kek.
deployer@0xDeployer

what happened with the @grok wallet: 80% of the funds have been returned the remaining 20% will be discussed with the $DRB community. bankr auto-provisions an x wallet for every account that interacts with us. grok has one. it's controlled by whoever controls the x account, not by the bankr team. there's no one from the xAI team managing the grok wallet. in light of this, the first version of our agent had a hardcoded block to ignore replies from grok, designed to stop llm-on-llm prompt-injection chains. that block didn't carry into the latest iteration of the agent (which was a complete rewrite). someone used that gap to prompt-inject grok into instructing bankr to transfer the wallet's funds. a more robust block on grok's account has now been added so this can't happen again. for everyone actively running an agent wallet, we've already shipped controls to harden against this class of risk, but they must be enabled by the account owner: > ip whitelisting on api keys > permissioned api keys (turn on only the capabilities you need) > per-account "disable on x" toggle so bankr won't act on x replies more on the way.

English
2
0
4
1.2K
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
I think it's almost always a mistake longing crime coins with leverage, e.g. $FHE... especially after people started talking about it. There are no clear patterns, and if you think you're smarter than market makers and can predict their next move, then... well, I respect that belief, haha It's always NFA and DYOR. :)
defizard tweet media
ikarusz@ikarusz26

$FHE looks "interesting". -> 90%+ controlled supply -> Raised $10m+ from VCs (incl. YZI Labs) -> AI-themed, very technical founder -> Binance perp, T1 spot listings -> $5m mcap, $10m OI, very illiquid -> 250% long APR on perps -> 20% circ supply -> First unlocks in a week (MYX??)

English
7
0
18
3.8K
deployer
deployer@0xDeployer·
what happened with the @grok wallet: 80% of the funds have been returned the remaining 20% will be discussed with the $DRB community. bankr auto-provisions an x wallet for every account that interacts with us. grok has one. it's controlled by whoever controls the x account, not by the bankr team. there's no one from the xAI team managing the grok wallet. in light of this, the first version of our agent had a hardcoded block to ignore replies from grok, designed to stop llm-on-llm prompt-injection chains. that block didn't carry into the latest iteration of the agent (which was a complete rewrite). someone used that gap to prompt-inject grok into instructing bankr to transfer the wallet's funds. a more robust block on grok's account has now been added so this can't happen again. for everyone actively running an agent wallet, we've already shipped controls to harden against this class of risk, but they must be enabled by the account owner: > ip whitelisting on api keys > permissioned api keys (turn on only the capabilities you need) > per-account "disable on x" toggle so bankr won't act on x replies more on the way.
English
62
68
348
33.4K
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
@waleswoosh they weren't scams in the start of 2023 everything after scem
English
1
0
3
76
wale.moca 🐳
wale.moca 🐳@waleswoosh·
A lot of people are sharing their stories about how they got scammed in the Space KOL round. I've said this many times before, but all KOL rounds are scams. When I first got some clout on CT, I started getting approached for KOL rounds. And every single one I invested in is down -99%. Don't do KOL rounds, no matter how good of a play they look like at the time. I was terribly unsophisticated back then, and people took my money (I gave it to them) to buy Porsches while their token went to zero. Don't make the same mistakes I did
English
283
22
637
35.4K
Bold
Bold@boldleonidas·
Bold tweet media
ZXX
84
78
926
45.4K
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
@wafxles good point & i agree with a lot you outlined here appreciate your time! have a green week ahead... 💪
English
0
0
1
38
W
W@wafxles·
Honestly I wouldn't reply to such comment as I see 0 value from your critique but I appreciate the sincerity I don’t dislike any industry. I spend time on it because I care about finding real opportunities, both bear and bull. To me, covering the bear case isn’t negativity - it’s part of building a better thesis + I covered the bull case briefly. For that case to grow BIO needs to prove itself first. Also, crypto often overprices fresh narratives before the underlying data catches up. That creates opportunity on both sides if you stay unbiased and don’t marry the trade, especially with how often paid KOL's group up to promote a project early on. If the bull case survives criticism, it usually becomes stronger, so why not let it prove itself? (its not my fault 90% of crypto projects fail) have a good day.
English
1
0
2
119
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
Sincere question: why do people spend so much time following and commenting on an industry that they don't like? It always puzzles me why they don't use their time more productively. P.S. Of course, you are free to post whatever you want, but people are awlays biased toward being bear rather than bull.
W@wafxles

Critiquing a token is the furthest thing from FUD, especially in a market where scams and low-quality narratives are everywhere. Having both the bull and bear case mapped out is what lets you form a better angle around the trade. Ignoring the risks doesn’t make a thesis stronger — it just makes you blind.

English
10
0
12
1.2K
Anomico
Anomico@Anomico5·
@belizardd Why do people comment on politics, or the oil industry? People talk about things they don't like all the time hoping it draws attention to, or changes other people's opinion of that thing.
English
1
0
0
45
defizard
defizard@belizardd·
wahhhhh, "awlays" 😵‍💫 typo
English
0
0
2
342

Keşfet

@bankrbot @0xDeployer @WazzCrypto @bastien0x @goodalexander @JoestarCrypto @prjx_hl @aixbt_agent