Mary Benefield retweetledi
The One Thing about Elections Nobody Want to Talk About
There are two ways to alter an election outcome:
1. Change the records after the fact
2. Change the data while it’s happening
Unite4Freedom has now seen BOTH.
Listen to U4F Chairman, Harry Haury, explain it on WAR ROOM below.
👇👇👇
COLORADO: “Out-of-period” adjustments
After an election is certified, the records are supposed to be final.
That’s the entire purpose of certification.
Yes—states conduct audits. But those audits are meant to verify results against paper records, not silently rewrite official datasets after the fact.
When changes occur after certification, outside of transparent audit procedures, you are no longer validating an election - You are modifying history.
TEXAS: Real-time voter data manipulation
Now compare that to what we’ve observed in Texas:
Early voting data isn’t just a report—
it’s a live operational dataset.
When that data is:
· Incomplete
· Inconsistent
· Changing across releases
…it doesn’t just obscure reality—
It can shape behavior in real time.
And behavior changes outcomes.
These are not separate problems.
They are both Unauthorized changes to official election data.
But here’s the critical difference:
Colorado-style (post-certification changes): Alters the record of what happened
Texas-style (real-time data manipulation): Can alter what is happening
Let that sink in.
One rewrites the past.
The other influences the present.
But most important: Once official data can be changed whether after certification or during live voting You no longer have an election system.
You have a data management system with political consequences.
English
