Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kepler-442b
10.1K posts

Kepler-442b
@betterplaylists
You can not offend me. Art. Science. Musician. Writer. Photographer. Always Learning. Be a good human.
Katılım Şubat 2020
494 Takip Edilen213 Takipçiler
Kepler-442b retweetledi

@TrishaMArt70 There is a timer feature that may help. (I’d argue for a tripod as well as leaning the phone can be a pain)
Although I am a photographer, this is advice from someone who has taken maybe 2 selfies in the last calendar year, so with a grain of salt as they say.
English
Kepler-442b retweetledi
Kepler-442b retweetledi

@darwintojesus You claim there is a god, the claim is yours to prove. You can’t be that dumb.
It’s actually worse for you, you have to prove your god, not just a generic creator.
I’ll wait.
English

I’ve never seen an atheist actually prove this, they just say it.
Make an argument.
🐅@southside_mafs
Like I said the burden of proof is for Christians not atheist
English
Kepler-442b retweetledi

@benwehrman The stars are not the same. You’re lying. I don’t need a book to know that.
You also have zero evidence of a creator.
It also seems like you are racist.
Be a better human.
English
Kepler-442b retweetledi

@kennymbeyer @NailOfTheFore @iamAtheistGirl Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Where do you even begin with someone like this?
English

@NailOfTheFore @iamAtheistGirl The Bible has never been proven wrong. It is 100% historical text. No historical event in the Bible has been proven wrong, only more correct. Approximately 2,500 prophesies have come true in the Bible. Sorry facts are hard.
English

Yes. This. 🍪⛓️
Goodnight my darlings 💋
#bedtimemusings
ShANk@BigShankkz
Love me some cookies and kinky shit right about now 😈
English

@RYboating Cancer it’s the number one killer in Canada. Assisted suicide isn’t even close.
It’s immoral for him to be bullshitting people, and it’s fucking dumb of you to buy it.
English

I didn't realize that assisted suicide in Canada is now the #1 killer.
I agree with Sec. Kennedy that it is immoral and doesn't belong in the US.
Life is precious and should be treated as such.
English

Kepler-442b retweetledi

@costateliving84 If you’re not washing all of your bits, I don’t think you’re doing it right.
English

@TrishaMArt70 I love music, writing, playing and listening to it. It is my church.
I cannot stand musicals of any kind.
English

@ApostateProphet @MMetaphysician I’d like proof of one god before we get into a threesome god.
English

No. This is a nonsensical argument as it has been explained to you by many people.
Christians believe that God is by NATURE Triune: one undivided divine essence in three Persons. You are treating "God" like a generic countable "god" and counting three instances of "god" by classical identity while disregarding what Christians believe about God's nature. This has been specifically and explicitly rejected in core Christian doctrine.
That is why your argument makes sense to you but it actually doesn't.
You don't get to force your misrepresentation of what Christians believe and then win the argument. If you think you can, good luck arguing with yourself or a wall.
English

CHALLENGE FOR TRINITARIANS: IS IT LOGICALLY POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE 3 GODS?
1 There are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity, if and only if there are exactly three distinct things that are God, and nothing else is God.
2 The Father is God.
3 The Son is God.
4 The Holy Spirit is God.
5 The Father is not identical to the Son.
6 The Father is not identical to the Holy Spirit.
7The Son is not identical to the Holy Spirit.
8 Anything that is God is identical to the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit.
9 Therefore, there are exactly three distinct things that are God, and nothing else is God.
10 It is logically and linguistically possible to interpret “God” with a count-noun reading and count its instances by classical identity.
11 If it is logically and linguistically possible to interpret “God” with a count-noun reading and count its instances by classical identity, and there are exactly three distinct things that are God and nothing else is God, then it is logically and linguistically possible that there are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity.
12 Therefore, it is logically and linguistically possible that there are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity.
Definition: C_I^*(G) = “G is interpreted with a count-noun reading of ‘God’, and its instances are counted by classical identity”
◇ₗₗ = it is logically and linguistically possible that
(i.e., consistent with the laws of logic AND a legitimate use of language)
(1) N_I(G,=3) ↔ ∃x∃y∃z(Gx ∧ Gy ∧ Gz ∧ x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ ∀w(Gw → (w = x ∨ w = y ∨ w = z)))
(2) Gf
(3) Gs
(4) Gh
(5) f ≠ s
(6) f ≠ h
(7) s ≠ h
(8) ∀w(Gw → (w = f ∨ w = s ∨ w = h))
(9) ∃x∃y∃z(Gx ∧ Gy ∧ Gz ∧ x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ ∀w(Gw → (w = x ∨ w = y ∨ w = z)))
(10) ◇ₗₗ C_I^*(G)
(11) ◇ₗₗ C_I^*(G) ∧ (9) → ◇ₗₗ N_I(G,=3)
(12) ◇ₗₗ N_I(G,=3)
P. S. You don’t get to rule out an interpretation just because it leads to an unwanted conclusion. You have to show it is linguistically or logically impossible or admit that on the Trinity it is possible that there are 3 gods.
English


















