Bhagyesh

Think of the Constitution as the operating system of the country. Women Reservation and Delimitation are just conditional code blocks in it. They only activate after the next Census. Today’s setback on delimitation is temporary. The bill is already passed in 2023 and the program is set to run. It will lock us in more reservations and turning the general category into a permanent underclass. We’re debugging too late. Just arm yourself with money, self-defense and if possible, jump the ship.

@legaljournalist @VishnuFNO

Not to mention, 33% of them being women. Equipped with fake cases and biased laws against men.

जिस देश का प्रधानमंत्री हर वर्ष पिछड़ा ही पिछड़ा होता जा रहा हो वह विश्वगुरु घंटा बनेगा ।

मै प्राश्चित करूंगा कि मैने इस महान झूठे आदमी का 2014 में समर्थन किया था। भारत के इतिहास में सबसे झूठा प्रधानमंत्री मोदी है। #मोदी_है_तो_बर्बादी_है

For clarity: Women Reservation Act, that is, 33% reservation for women is alive and in effect from 16.4.2026. All that Govt needs to do is to bring a Bill to identify and reserve those 33% seats among the existing 543 seats.

@mxtaverse The country is programmed to become a permanent underclass. Or maybe just sitting on a civil-war. I never thought I'd see one in my lifetime. But here we are.

I think Modi govt will delay delimitation by 25 more years, just like Indira Gandhi and Vajpayee did. Women's reservation will be implemeted on 543 seats for 2029 elections. OBC reservation maybe implemented later after caste census data is made public.

@KirenRijiju @narendramodi આ બિલ મહિલા અનામત ના નામે સીમાંકન કરી 820 MP દેશ ની સામાન્ય પ્રજા ને આપવાનો હતો , 543 જ માંડ સચવાય છે તો 820 માટે VIP કલ્ચર, મફત પ્લેન, અને બીજું ઘણું બધુ ઉપરાંત આજીવન પેન્શન હાલ પોષાય એમ નથી . જો ઈમાનદારી હોય પક્ષ માં તો 543 માંથી 33 શું 50 ટકા મહિલા ઉમેદવાર રાખે વગર અનામત થી

@KirenRijiju @narendramodi डिलिमिटेशन बिल संसद में गिर गया। मोदी और BJP टुकड़े-टुकड़े गैंग की तरह राज्यों को तोड़ना चाहती थी। संसद में “महिला आरक्षण बिल” नही “BJP जिताओ बिल” लाया गया था। BJP अपनी सीटें बढ़ाने की साज़िश रच रही थी जो बुरी तरह नाकाम हो गई।

Ouch, I got played by the BJP as everyone else. Turns out Women Reservation bill has been passed in 2023. They just bundled 2-3 bills together and projected as women's reservation. Our country is never going to recover from the hellhole. @narendramodi: you will burn in hell.

@tehseenp @priyankac19 @ariinss Tehseen, didn't expect this from you. Hard unfollow.

@priyankac19 @ariinss More power to u.

I have a stand on women’s reservation and consistently have had it and I will continue to express it. Deal with it.

@priyankac19 Cry harder.

If delimitation is unjust for southern state then reservation based on proportion of the population is unjust for UC.

Based Khangress.

@MediaHarshVT Tere jaise nikammo ki wajah se journalism badnaam hai

सीटें बढ़ती, महिला आरक्षण होता तो महिलाओं का प्रतिनिधित्व बढ़ने के साथ SC-ST, OBC, Muslim सबका प्रतिनिधित्व बढ़ता, लेकिन मोदी विरोध में सबका नुकसान कर दिया। नए लोगों को राजनीति में आने का अवसर मिलता।

@MediaHarshVT Abe chutiye..chup kr muh tera

@narendramodi Tu nikal idhar se hootiye

मैं सभी सांसदों से कहूंगा... आप अपने घर में मां-बहन-बेटी-पत्नी सबका स्मरण करते हुए अपनी अंतरात्मा को सुनिए ... देश की नारीशक्ति की सेवा का, उनके वंदन का ये बहुत बड़ा अवसर है। उन्हें नए अवसरों से वंचित नहीं करिए। ये संशोधन सर्वसम्मति से पारित होगा, तो देश की नारीशक्ति और सशक्त होगी… देश का लोकतंत्र और सशक्त होगा। आइए… हम मिलकर आज इतिहास रचें। भारत की नारी को… देश की आधी आबादी को उसका हक दें।

THANK GOD!!! You loser @narendramodi, thank god you didn't get 400 seats. Our country doesn't need anymore reservation and appeasement. Opposition ki jai ho, for whatever selfish reasons, they didn't let it pass. @narendramodi @AmitShah : Pls resign immediately. You're not required.

Being a woman, I am against women’s reservation bill. No one should be given reservation in India on the basis of caste, religion, gender or any other identity. People should be selected purely on the basis of MERIT.

Most people think of philosophy as an abstraction that doesn't touch the real world, but they're wrong. Most real world problems are philosophy problems, and most philosophy problems are "giving things the wrong names". For example, if you call feral drug addicts "homeless people", then you can't solve the problem. You can only buy more houses for feral drug addicts to destroy. In this case, we called the police and courts the "justice system". But they're not. They can't be the justice system. The function of a justice system would be to give everyone what they deserve. Now, I deserve a hundred million dollars, a private Caribbean island, and a foot massage from Lauren Bacall in her prime, but I don't see the "justice" system lifting a finger to correct any of this, do you? No, what we are supposed to have is a public safety system. The function of a public safety system is to keep the public and their property safe. If we understood that, we wouldn't care about what criminals deserve. We would care how likely they are to do it again. Or something worse. In a public safety system, retardation and mental illness are not migrating factors. They are the opposite. Because they mean that the criminal is more likely to pose a future threat. We all understand this. We all understand that the feral retard who stabs strangers on the train for being White and beautiful is a worse person than the man who murders his wife and her lover when he catches them in the act. Not because of some abstract calculus of moral agency, of who is disadvantaged and who isn't, but because one is certainly going to murder more people if he can, while the other is a lot less likely to. We've known for centuries, if not millennia, that it's the same small percentage of people doing all the robbing, raping, and murdering, over and over and over again. And we've known for centuries that if you physically remove them from society, that's 100% effective in stopping them from doing it again. The only hurdle is philosophical. Call it a "justice" system, and you have to argue endlessly about morality and redemption, and then some leftie thug-hugger weaponizes your own Christianity against you. Call it public safety, and you confine the argument to likelihood of reoffense. Then you are in the realm of statistics. Which you can compute. It all starts with naming things correctly, according to their actual nature.