BIGCOIN

Mining requires little human intervention.

I would enjoy seeing you @AdamWeitsman get involved with @AbstractChain NFTs especially @bigcoinmining It’s pretty cool and the team and the community of miners are helpful 😀 scrap metal recycling 🤝 $BIG mining

Yes this includes staked Bigcoin miners. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

The people have spoke and Abstract answered. Meanwhile I'm just sitting here mining @bigcoinmining daily. I SMH at the people that couldn't even last 30 days voting to get a boost. 🤣

57.5% burned Ultra-Rare at 8.6 million @bigcoinmining $BIG

I say this with respect because I genuinely believe in you and wanted to build high quality projects on Abstract. We keep trying to bring attention to these issues not to spread FUD, but because we have genuinely worked our asses off building successful projects on Abstract, including @BigP00l, @zerotohero, and stepping in as CTO of @bigcoinmining , which would have completely died if we had not taken it over. We spent a significant amount of money on audits and smart contract development to build Merge Mining, which has been fully functional for nearly four months now. The problem is that we cannot launch a coin when there is no volume on the chain. At one point we even offered a $10,000 bounty for any team planning to launch a worthy coin on Abstract. Not a single team responded. Because of that, the only logical path forward for Big Coin was to pivot and turn it into a first of its kind launchpad that is sniper resistant. Instead of allowing anyone to launch a token, projects would need to work directly with us and receive approval. That way our community and holders would know that if something launches through the platform, it has been thoroughly vetted and is safe to participate in. One of the main reasons teams are not launching coins on Abstract is because early on a number of KOLs and KOL groups were insider launching coins. People lost money. The fastest way to lose users on a young chain is to have them get burned. We did not just believe in Abstract. We cared enough to be thoughtful about what we were building. Instead of chasing quick financial gains, we wanted to build strong projects that would actually help the ecosystem succeed. For example, the last project that attempted dynamic traits at scale was Memeland Captains, which raised over $61 million. They still have not successfully delivered dynamic traits, and their art has not even been completed after more than two years. When we launched @zerotohero, we deliberately chose Abstract because we believed in the vision of the chain. Our goal was to launch the first fully dynamic collection with gender swap functionality, dynamic traits, and an innovative closet system. We raised $480,000 and delivered everything within one month of launch. Since then we have reached over 100 million GIPHY views in three months and we are consistently seeing hundreds of thousands of views on our animated shorts across social platforms. We have a world class animator on our team and we typically produce a new animation every day. Since September 4th we have created around 45 unique animated shorts. We also launched a monthly trait subscription model, another first in the space. On top of that we have hosted four different week long holiday trait events that were completely free for holders, and we have collaborated with Gigaverse, OnChain Heroes, and Aborean. Yet somehow we were not even included in Abstract Wrapped. 😂 Our cult like community rallied and on February 6th we generated 30 million GIPHY views the same day we were not included in Abstract Wrapped. There are not even that many strong projects on the chain, so it is honestly hard to understand how the team could be unaware of the projects that are consistently building and delivering. I reached out to the ecosystem team and it was honestly surprising that many of them were not even familiar with the project. Some messages I sent over a month ago still have not received a response. Meanwhile a project like Ultraman, which clearly extracted money from users, receives a badge and likely will never build anything meaningful again. Cryptoys was promoted with a badge and XP even though it was a recycled project that had already failed on Flow. If you continue hearing the same concerns from multiple teams, it might be time to listen. What is frustrating is watching project after project that gets promoted fail, while teams that are working hard, delivering value to the ecosystem are ignored.

@bigcoinmining upgraded to shed , dozens of offers place on OS Locked tf in ! fuggin awesome !

Fug it up.

Keep going.

If Bitcoin can't do it, Bigcoin will.

By all metrics, Bigcoin was the most novel crypto experiment in 2025.

Cool launch it with merge mining.

Mine Big Mine XP

Super Bowl party at my new warehouse. Bought my first Blackwell during the game. Always be mining.

Bigcoin has not been co-opted by Blackrock and the government.

Big year!

gg

Always Be Mining.

Happy XP Day to those who celebrate.