eunwoo lover 🌙

2.9K posts

eunwoo lover 🌙 banner
eunwoo lover 🌙

eunwoo lover 🌙

@binnieddan

she/her

Katılım Ekim 2020
238 Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL
Cha Eunwoo’s hit drama <My ID is Gangnam Beauty> will be broadcast on StarCat 11 in Japan 📅 From March 24th ⏰ 8PM 🇯🇵 📺 @starcat_ch #ChaEunwoo #차은우 #GangnamBeauty #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優
English
7
172
419
12.5K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
sravasti Jannat
sravasti Jannat@thisjnj·
media silently slides over the fact the SK government spent $14M in tax money on a corporate concert, yet they're tearing apart #ChaEunwoo—an active soldier—for an ongoing tax assessment with NO VERDICT. They’ve witch-hunted him, fabricated a civil audit as a crime.
pannchoa@pannchoa

Domestic security firms estimate that the government has spent 14M USD in taxes for BTS' Gwanghwamun concert tinyurl.com/2zd8kxc4

English
4
38
137
5.1K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
danni ꕤ
danni ꕤ@24hrsanha·
sanha learning english sanha telling us to not be surprised if his music style changes sanha confirming 2026 activities SANHA COMEBACK? SANHA TOUR? SANHA WORLD DOMINATION? THE POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS!
English
0
63
262
2.7K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗮
เป็นแก้วเป็นแสง เป็นยองเป็นใย ✨
ไทย
0
154
734
8.3K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
ASTRO Charts
ASTRO Charts@chartsastro·
ASTRO is nominated for 'K-POP World Choice - Group' at the Seoul Music Awards. #ASTRO @offclASTRO
ASTRO Charts tweet mediaASTRO Charts tweet media
English
1
182
444
4.5K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
calvinklein
calvinklein@CalvinKlein·
CHA EUN-WOO captured on film. which look is your fav?
calvinklein tweet mediacalvinklein tweet media
English
40
805
2.4K
94.5K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
Vanessa00
Vanessa00@foxxes812·
CHA EUNWOO IS BEING UNFAIRLY SINGLED OUT in this economic article about supplementary budget funding from excess taxes. ‼️‼️ The piece lists tax recoveries broadly (audits, overdue collections) to show government revenue sources amid global crisis response. Yet it highlights his name in a 20 billion won controversy that’s STILL UNDER DISPUTE — NOT FINALIZED ‘EVASION’ CASE.‼️‼️ His side has requested pre-assessment review (tax fairness review before final assessment), arguing the company was legitimate for stability during agency turmoil, not a mere paper entity. NO CRIMINAL CHARGES; it’s a tax interpretation disagreement, common in entertainment.‼️‼️ Dragging his name into an UNRELATED geopolitical/economic story seems like piling on during a sensitive time (he’s serving in the military). MANY CELEBRITIES use similar structures, this isn’t unique to him. Let’s wait for DUE PROCESS instead of premature judgment.‼️‼️ MEDIA REPORTING SHOULD EXCERCISE DUE DILIGENCE in presenting facts about his case rather than sensationalizing an ongoing process.‼️‼️ #SUPPORTCHAEUNWOO #JUSTICEforCHAEUNWOO #CHAEUNWOO #차은우 n.news.naver.com/article/005/00…
Vanessa00 tweet mediaVanessa00 tweet mediaVanessa00 tweet media
English
3
71
275
11.1K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
berry
berry@berryeunu·
Something important just happened that everyone following Eunwoo's case needs to know about. The Korean government announced an emergency budget to deal with the US-Iran war situation. To fund it, they listed ongoing tax cases as revenue sources and Cha Eunwoo's case is explicitly named as one of them. This is a problem because his case is still being reviewed. Nothing has been finalized. But the government is already counting his tax assessment as money they will collect. This puts enormous pressure on the people reviewing his case because if they reduce or reverse it, the government has a hole in their emergency budget. They can still follow the normal process and accept his pre-assessment review. That option is not off the table. But it is significantly harder now. The people making that decision are no longer just tax officials doing their job. They are operating under political and fiscal pressure that has nothing to do with whether his case is actually valid. I hope his legal team at Sejong almost certainly anticipated something like this and are preparing accordingly. His case stopped being just about taxes a long time ago. Today just made it official. #차은우 #ChaEunwoo
English
31
221
491
50.4K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL@ChaEunwooINTL·
Cha Eunwoo’s tax dispute has sparked wider debate among entertainment industry insiders, tax experts, accountants, and legal professionals over income attribution and the broader use of one-person corporations by high-income individuals. The Seoul Regional Tax Office reportedly imposed an additional tax assessment of approximately 20 billion KRW on income that had been reported as corporate tax through a one-person agency established under a family member’s name. Authorities are examining whether the company had genuine operational substance. The core issue is whether the income should be classified as personal service earnings (subject to a top personal income tax rate exceeding 40%) or as corporate revenue taxed at lower rates. Beyond the individual case, the controversy has evolved into a broader debate over how corporate substance should be defined and applied in practice. Tax professionals observe that one-person corporate structures previously accepted by convention are now being reinterpreted more strictly. While the objectives of securing tax revenue and ensuring fairness are acknowledged, some experts caution that repeated large-scale reassessments without sufficiently clear, pre-established guidelines may undermine legal predictability and taxpayer trust. Professor Yoon Ji-hyun of Seoul National University Law School noted that “the essence of the case is not the mere establishment of a corporation, but the question of under what circumstances a corporation’s substantive reality should be recognized.” She warned that without carefully articulated and precise standards, similar disputes are likely to recur. Legal analysts further emphasize that the broader issue reflects a tension between the principle of substance-over-form taxation and the need for legal stability. Some members of the legal community predict that the case could extend beyond an individual dispute and influence the broader trend of high-earning sole proprietors converting to corporate structures. Similar scrutiny could also affect other one-person business models, including YouTubers, influencers, and independent professionals. #ChaEunwoo’s representatives have reportedly filed a pre-assessment review request and are preparing documentation to demonstrate the corporation’s legitimacy and substantive operation. Depending on the National Tax Service’s final determination, the outcome could lead to meaningful changes in tax practices within the entertainment industry and in how high-income individuals utilize corporate entities. #차은우 #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL tweet media
English
20
330
646
49.2K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
berry
berry@berryeunu·
Think about what this means for Eunwoo's case. A tax official leaks his private information illegally. A "20 billion won tax evasion" headline explodes. The public destroys his reputation overnight. And the whole time, the official who started it all might have been chasing a performance bonus for that exact collection amount. They didn't go after Cha Eunwoo because he did something wrong. They went after him because he was worth 20 billion won to someone's paycheck #CHAEUNWOO #차은우
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL@ChaEunwooINTL

📰 Korea Taxpayers’ Association: Tax Official Bonus System Causes Administrative Distortion… ‘It Must Be Abolished’ The KTA stated that the system, introduced last March under the amended Framework Act on National Taxes, which allows tax officials to receive bonuses of up to 20M KRW per year, causes serious administrative distortions and must be abolished. Article 84-3 of the Framework Act on National Taxes stipulates that “tax officials who have made special contributions to the assessment, collection, or litigation of national taxes may receive a reward,” and allows a bonus of up to 20M KRW or 10% of the additional taxes collected, amounts recovered through litigation, or delinquent collections. The KTA expressed concern that this bonus system could undermine the fairness and objectivity of taxation. The association said, “Directly linking financial rewards to the performance of tax officials creates incentives for excessive taxation or aggressive audits in order to increase collection results.” They explained that “this poses a risk to the neutrality of tax administration”. The association also argued that tax audits could instead encourage tax evasion: “In a system where collection results lead to bonuses, a strategy of ‘occasional evasion with partial collection’ may be a rational choice over ‘100% honest reporting,’” because even those who report honestly may have to pay additional taxes for the benefit of the investigating officials. “This can weaken the foundation of voluntary compliance”. This, they said, also violates the principle of popular sovereignty. KTA emphasized, “Public officials serve all citizens,” adding that “the bonus system risks reducing taxpayers to mere tools for achieving audit targets”. They further noted that the structure encourages after-the-fact collection rather than preventive measures. They explained, “Pre-audit guidance for honest reporting is not eligible for incentives, but high-value collections are immediately rewarded. In such cases, tax administration may become performance-driven rather than prevention-focused”. KTA also questioned the actual revenue impact. “Even if the collected amount is later overturned in appeals or litigation, the bonus may already have been paid. Officials who lose in court years later face no real consequences, while taxpayers bear enormous time and financial costs, along with significant psychological stress”. The association stated that the system is also inconsistent with international trends. “In the US, evaluation based on collection results or quota assignments is legally prohibited, and Sweden excludes collection performance from personnel evaluations,” the association explained. “By contrast, Korea institutionalized a performance-based reward system.” They raised the possibility of abuse. “A bonus of up to 20M KRW is a significant financial incentive, which may lead to side effects such as the illegal leakage of tax information or excessive expansion of audit scope”. Specifically regarding actor #CHAEUNWOO, the association commented, “The tax official who illegally leaked Cha Eunwoo’s tax information may have aimed for the bonus, expecting positive evaluation within the organization based on the apparent achievement of ‘20 billion KRW collected’ and the negative public opinion generated around high-income tax evasion”. They added, “Leaking tax information is clearly illegal, and a performance-driven system can encourage such deviations”. Chairman Kim Seontaek said, “The Framework Act on National Taxes was hastily passed last March during the impeachment political crisis, and no lawmakers raised objections to this provision, indicating that the legislative function did not operate properly”. He continued, “High tax collections by the NTS do not necessarily represent socially desirable outcomes,” and concluded, “The bonus system must be abolished immediately”. #차은우 #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優

English
1
67
179
4.7K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL@ChaEunwooINTL·
📰 Korea Taxpayers’ Association: Tax Official Bonus System Causes Administrative Distortion… ‘It Must Be Abolished’ The KTA stated that the system, introduced last March under the amended Framework Act on National Taxes, which allows tax officials to receive bonuses of up to 20M KRW per year, causes serious administrative distortions and must be abolished. Article 84-3 of the Framework Act on National Taxes stipulates that “tax officials who have made special contributions to the assessment, collection, or litigation of national taxes may receive a reward,” and allows a bonus of up to 20M KRW or 10% of the additional taxes collected, amounts recovered through litigation, or delinquent collections. The KTA expressed concern that this bonus system could undermine the fairness and objectivity of taxation. The association said, “Directly linking financial rewards to the performance of tax officials creates incentives for excessive taxation or aggressive audits in order to increase collection results.” They explained that “this poses a risk to the neutrality of tax administration”. The association also argued that tax audits could instead encourage tax evasion: “In a system where collection results lead to bonuses, a strategy of ‘occasional evasion with partial collection’ may be a rational choice over ‘100% honest reporting,’” because even those who report honestly may have to pay additional taxes for the benefit of the investigating officials. “This can weaken the foundation of voluntary compliance”. This, they said, also violates the principle of popular sovereignty. KTA emphasized, “Public officials serve all citizens,” adding that “the bonus system risks reducing taxpayers to mere tools for achieving audit targets”. They further noted that the structure encourages after-the-fact collection rather than preventive measures. They explained, “Pre-audit guidance for honest reporting is not eligible for incentives, but high-value collections are immediately rewarded. In such cases, tax administration may become performance-driven rather than prevention-focused”. KTA also questioned the actual revenue impact. “Even if the collected amount is later overturned in appeals or litigation, the bonus may already have been paid. Officials who lose in court years later face no real consequences, while taxpayers bear enormous time and financial costs, along with significant psychological stress”. The association stated that the system is also inconsistent with international trends. “In the US, evaluation based on collection results or quota assignments is legally prohibited, and Sweden excludes collection performance from personnel evaluations,” the association explained. “By contrast, Korea institutionalized a performance-based reward system.” They raised the possibility of abuse. “A bonus of up to 20M KRW is a significant financial incentive, which may lead to side effects such as the illegal leakage of tax information or excessive expansion of audit scope”. Specifically regarding actor #CHAEUNWOO, the association commented, “The tax official who illegally leaked Cha Eunwoo’s tax information may have aimed for the bonus, expecting positive evaluation within the organization based on the apparent achievement of ‘20 billion KRW collected’ and the negative public opinion generated around high-income tax evasion”. They added, “Leaking tax information is clearly illegal, and a performance-driven system can encourage such deviations”. Chairman Kim Seontaek said, “The Framework Act on National Taxes was hastily passed last March during the impeachment political crisis, and no lawmakers raised objections to this provision, indicating that the legislative function did not operate properly”. He continued, “High tax collections by the NTS do not necessarily represent socially desirable outcomes,” and concluded, “The bonus system must be abolished immediately”. #차은우 #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優
CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL tweet mediaCHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL tweet media
English
19
426
747
90.9K
eunwoo lover 🌙
eunwoo lover 🌙@binnieddan·
I just rewatched some MITH episodes and I miss Eunwoo SO MUCH
English
0
0
0
41
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
lee ☆
lee ☆@inspiritof·
i connected to the speakers at work after close and my 40-yr-old male coworker who only listens to only dubstep comes up to me and says “is this kpop?” and i was like yeah! and he was like “i know a kpop group!” and i’m expecting bts or blackpink. tell me why this mf says ASTRO
English
89
1K
28.7K
357.4K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗮
𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗮@cewycha·
CHA EUNWOO THE MAN YOU ARE .
English
0
88
465
4.9K
eunwoo lover 🌙 retweetledi
kdrama trash ✨
kdrama trash ✨@tttalkskdrama·
Feeling very “and another thing!” about the revelation that Eunwoo has been directly making deals since fuckass Fanta can’t, but… I remember thinking Entity was too well put together, with such strong theming in songs and even packaging, there was no way Fanta did it themselves.
English
3
28
141
3.1K