TR

Climate models have a tiny verification sample on independent data & it's not good. Plus, notoriously bad at discerning regional changes. Basically, after a few months, they just regurgitate starting assumptions. Yet we are expected to spend billions on their answers. Crazy

I’d sincerely love to hear the answer: Why should a plumber who chose not to go to college & makes $30K a year pay off the student loan debt of a social worker who did go to college & makes $50K a year?

To every spineless republican who is hedging their bets by not shouting the truth about the United States election being rigged, know this: in the end, truth and light always win. Cowardice will be your legacy.

An interesting diagram in “The Illustrated London Almanack of 1851” showing the mean temperature at Greenwich from 1770-1850. Note the transition from the warm 1770’s to the very cold 1780-1790’s. Also cold years for 1810‘s and late 1830’s. Fairly Warm 1820-35 and 1840’s.

Our forefathers set up the most elegant system of government. The checks and balances system is brilliant.

If the violent behavior of fringe elements like ANTIFA and others supported by similar organizations portends what we have to look forward to under a lawless Biden presidency, then we should all be extremely focused on what is about to be revealed by dominion and the voter fraud

Two flawed climate change studies have been accepted into Nature. A recent modeling study has made headlines for claiming we're "past the point of rescue," and a hurricane study is receiving backlash. REMINDER: Just b/c something is pal-reviewed doesn't always mean it's credible.