Angelo retweetledi
Angelo
1.3K posts

Angelo
@biskossk
CDL-A Local Driver/Part time Swing Trader/Beginner Options Trader. Star Wars. Metal/Punk/Rock. Always knew I was going to be rich one day.
Pensacola Katılım Temmuz 2015
681 Takip Edilen103 Takipçiler
Angelo retweetledi

If you are for #PEACE , if you want every soldier to comeback home safe and every civilian to have dignity, like and share….
English

The libs are doing the “trump is secretly dying thing again”
John Bourscheid 🇺🇸 🚀@bourscheid
Never ask: A woman her age A man his salary The White House why the president is getting a secret medical procedure that makes him unable to do public appearances for the first 2-4 days of almost every month since September 2025.
English
Angelo retweetledi

Jesus loves. Christian Nationalism kills.
You may pray for my death, Pastor, but I still love you.
I love you more than you could ever hate me.
Jennifer Bendery@jbendery
New: Pete Hegseth’s pastor and close spiritual advisor says he wants Texas Democratic state Rep. James Talarico to die. “We want him crucified with Christ,” Brooks Potteiger said of Talarico, as the podcast host said he prays “that God kills him.” huffpost.com/entry/pete-heg…
English
Angelo retweetledi
Angelo retweetledi
Angelo retweetledi

The paid grifters, partisan hacks, and bots are out in force—misleading people about the Constitution and the law—to defend Trump’s unconstitutional war.
Here’s an important Iran war PSA:
Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1550), it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60–90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours.
Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly:
“The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”
Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress’s approval) offensive military action.
The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress’s express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war).
The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress’s approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans.
It’s for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there’s an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account.
The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the “power to repel sudden attacks” but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval.
The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack.
The fact that previous presidents have violated both the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution does not—and cannot—change the law or make any present military action lawful.
English
Angelo retweetledi
Angelo retweetledi

It’s important that you understand what happened last night.
Last night, Stephen Colbert interviewed Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico, a candidate who, by all accounts, is on track in the polls to flip Texas blue.
In response, Trump’s FCC reportedly threatened CBS if the interview aired.
CBS caved and pulled the segment, citing “financial reasons.”
In modern American history, no president has been more hostile to free speech than Donald Trump.
But censorship always backfires.
Here’s the full segment Trump didn’t want you to see.
English

@TerryMoran I don't think any of these people have any working brain cells left
English

Megyn Kelly: Raping fourteen-year-old girls is not really ped0philia, so relax.
Karoline Leavitt: They were neighbors, so it’s OK.
Todd Blanche: You can party with Epstein no problem.
At this point, MAGA—how much of your soul is left to sell?
Acyn@Acyn
Blanche: It's not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein.
English

Angelo retweetledi

@MusingsInRetail No kidding, the worst customers I ever dealt with when I work at Lowe's were old white boomers
English

@Sadmethod This shit sent me to the hospital with acute liver failure, never again
English













