bjr229

4.7K posts

bjr229

bjr229

@bjr2291

Katılım Ağustos 2018
356 Takip Edilen82 Takipçiler
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
Truth bomb. Communism is fatal
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

La prochaine fois que tu vois une âme perdue défendre le socialisme économique ou le communisme comme un modèle de vertu, partage lui ce post. Ça évitera peut-être une nouvelle boucherie. « On n'a jamais vraiment essayé le vrai communisme. » Si. On a essayé. Une vingtaine de fois. Sur quatre continents. Pendant un siècle. Et on a les chiffres. Chine, Grand Bond en avant (1958–1962). Les historiens indépendants ayant accédé aux archives provinciales convergent sur une fourchette de 30 à 45 millions de morts. Frank Dikötter (Université de Hong Kong), à partir des archives du PCC, retient 45 millions, dont 2,5 millions battus à mort ou exécutés par la milice. Yang Jisheng, ancien journaliste de l'agence Xinhua, dix ans d'enquête, retient 36 millions dans Stèles. L'historien chinois Yu Xiguang, vingt ans de recherche, monte à 55 millions. Pour donner une échelle : c'est la totalité des morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, concentrée sur quatre ans, dans un seul pays, sans guerre. URSS. Holodomor 1932–1933, famine planifiée en Ukraine, reconnue comme génocide par le Parlement européen le 15 décembre 2022. Goulag, Grandes Purges 1936–1938, déplacements forcés de populations entières. Le bilan retenu par le Livre noir du communisme tourne autour de 20 millions de morts pour l'ensemble de la période. Cambodge, Pol Pot. Environ 2 millions de morts en moins de quatre ans, soit près d'un quart de la population. S-21, Choeung Ek, évacuation forcée des villes en quelques jours. Corée du Nord, Vietnam, Europe de l'Est, Afrique communiste, Amérique latine. Encore plusieurs millions cumulés. Bilan global retenu par le Livre noir du communisme : environ 100 millions de morts. Chiffre repris en 2006 par la résolution 1481 de l'Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe, et en 2023 par une résolution au Parlement européen. On peut discuter la marge — 80, 90, 100 millions selon les méthodologies — mais comme l'écrivait Laurent Joffrin dans Libération, pourtant pas suspect de complaisance avec la droite : à 60 millions au lieu de 100, le communisme deviendrait-il présentable ? Et le contre-exemple « doux » ? Venezuela. Pas de goulag, pas de famine planifiée. Juste l'application méthodique du programme. Résultat sur dix ans : le PIB s'est contracté de plus de 75 % entre 2014 et 2021 — la plus grande contraction économique en temps de paix depuis 45 ans selon l'Institute of International Finance. Inflation annuelle de 130 060 % en 2018 selon la Banque centrale du Venezuela elle-même, dépassant 1 000 000 % la même année selon le FMI. Près de 8 millions de personnes — soit environ 25 % de la population — ont quitté le pays. Le plus grand exode de l'histoire de l'hémisphère occidental sur les 50 dernières années selon l'OEA et le HCR. En 2024, 82 % des Vénézuéliens vivaient dans la pauvreté, dont 53 % en extrême pauvreté. Zéro exception. Zéro contre-exemple. À chaque fois la même mécanique. Une caste auto-proclamée vertueuse s'empare du pouvoir au nom du peuple, et finit en nomenklatura planquée dans des datchas pendant que 99 % de la population fait la queue pour du pain. Quand Maduro distribuait ses CLAP — boîtes alimentaires rationnées et militarisées — c'était la même logique que Brejnev dans les magasins réservés de la nomenklatura, soixante ans plus tard, sous un drapeau différent. Hayek avait tout prédit en 1944, dans La Route de la servitude. Et Mises encore avant, en 1920, avec le problème du calcul économique : quand tu remplaces les prix du marché par la planification centrale, tu détruis l'unique mécanisme capable d'agréger l'information dispersée dans des millions de têtes. Il te faut donc une autorité qui décide à la place de tous. Cette autorité ne peut pas connaître ce qu'elle prétend planifier, donc elle impose par la contrainte. Et comme ça échoue toujours — voir Venezuela, qui a appliqué la séquence à la lettre : contrôle des prix par la Fair Prices Act de 2014, puis nationalisations, puis hyperinflation, puis rationnement militarisé — il faut contraindre de plus en plus fort pour survivre. La tyrannie n'est pas un dérapage du socialisme. C'est son équilibre logique. Le capitalisme de marché n'est pas parfait. C'est juste le seul système connu dans l'histoire où des millions d'inconnus coopèrent sans qu'une caste armée les y oblige. Les morts de Kolyma, du Laogai, de S-21 et des rues de Caracas vous demandent de ne pas recommencer. J'adore me tromper, ça me permet d'apprendre. Si tu penses que je me trompe sur un point précis, dis-le moi dans les commentaires, je lis tout.

English
0
0
0
5
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@lesliedouglasx This breaks down along emotional versus logical lines. Real verses imaginary. Engineers, plumbers, surgeons all deal with physical problems using logic
English
0
0
1
161
Leslie Douglas
Leslie Douglas@lesliedouglasx·
At first glance, this seems like a division between the working class and the managerial class, but it's not quite that simple. There are engineers and surgeons on the Republican side. What we're really witnessing here is a split between those who work (miners, engineers, surgeons) and those who mostly pretend to work (yoga instructors, film industry workers, social scientists).
Emil Kirkegaard@KirkegaardEmil

Most left vs. right wing occupations in USA. (Measured by donations.)

English
220
541
5.1K
297.7K
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@JohnCleese @naomirwolf Your mistake is thinking Islam is a religion. It is a political ideology with religious elements
English
0
0
0
24
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
I read everywhere about the 'hard right' This the term used to describe people who are Islamosceptic - that is, people who are doubtful about the merits of a religion that demands child marriage, the beating of women, and death to all who oppose it Perhaps 'sensible right' would be a better description
English
1.7K
9.7K
55.1K
680.2K
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@RepJackKimble Some real idiots would be an upgrade over the current batch of corrupt politicians.
English
0
1
0
6
Rep. Jack Kimble
Rep. Jack Kimble@RepJackKimble·
Just a friendly warning. We don’t even make $200k per year in Congress despite working nearly 140 days. If we aren’t properly compensated, a lot of us will go to the private sector and you will be left with some real idiots in Congress.
English
49.3K
2.5K
29.7K
19.5M
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@CartesianDemons @YasMohammedxx It isn’t a problem of attention span, it is a prioritization of my valuable time. Too much to learn, too little time
English
1
0
0
24
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@ewarren Big business LOVES big government! You can’t be in favor of bigger government and not understand that business will use it to punish small business
English
0
0
1
6
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
Our government isn’t broken. It works great for billionaires. For Big Pharma. For Wall Street. For corporations that can hire lobbyists. It's rigged for the wealthy and well-connected. We need to build a better system—one that works for working people.
English
1.5K
534
2K
51.8K
bjr229 retweetledi
Chip Roy
Chip Roy@chiproytx·
There are two important steps we need to take to stop the advance of Sharia law in our country: 1. PAUSE all immigration 2. Win cases in court by making it clear Islam is a political ideology, not a religion that can hide behind the First Amendment.
English
568
3.5K
11.8K
258.7K
bjr229 retweetledi
Johnny B. Good
Johnny B. Good@Cat5SMASHICANE·
Here's something that comes around about once every lifetime. Zero out and all of a sudden the inning is over. A triple play is something so rare. 82 years before this was the last one. 🔥⚾️
English
130
575
5K
490K
bjr229 retweetledi
Phantom II
Phantom II@Phantom2Phlyer·
It is sad to see people actually thinking that Steve Hilton can win the governorship, or Spencer Pratt can win the mayoral election in Los Angeles. They don't understand California politics. Let me tell you two sad facts: neither thing can happen. Joseph Stalin once said words to the effect that the people who vote don't determine elections. The people that count the votes determine elections. But there's more than that in California, and Stalin would have been amazed if he had seen how this state has rigged elections. If everyone in the state voted for Hilton, and everyone in LA voted for Pratt, both would still lose. You think I'm exaggerating? Here's how Democrats have rigged the system. In California, every registered voter, alive or dead, legal or illegal, still in district or not, gets a ballot mailed to them. Every single one. In CA, ballot harvesting is legal. Which means the massive Democrat machine sends operatives out to collect those ballots that were sent to people who aren't there, or senile citizens in old folk's homes, or anywhere else they can, and votes them for Democrats. Then, they dump those ballots into the conveniently placed collection boxes that are all around the state, so the scammers don't have to go very far to drop them off. No need to actually pay for postage. Nope. Just drop them off. Then there's the fact that any ballot received within seven days after an election gets counted. If the Democrats need a little push, they just put those pre-postmarked ballots into the post office box, and they get sent to arrive in time to change the election results. The real problem is that there is no low-level Republican effort to rebuild Republican presence from the bottom up. The CA Republican party is a bunch of elite do-nothings who ask for money and then use that money for 'election events' like dinners, flights around everywhere, and pontifications. They're as big a bunch of grifters as Democrats are. They just have less power. So before you all go "Rah Rah!!! We're going to win!!!" Realize that not only is the deck stacked against Republicans, but the order of the cards in the deck are already determined. The winner of the California gubernatorial race will be whichever Democrat gets on the general election ballot. And the winner of the LA Mayor's race will be Karen Bass. Not because the people voted for them. But because it's the Democrat machine that "counts the votes."
English
640
1.1K
4K
222K
bjr229 retweetledi
Adam Scheidler
Adam Scheidler@Scheidsa·
This may be the song of the summer.
English
883
7.3K
38.3K
3.5M
Hasan alrabay
Hasan alrabay@HasanEssam29636·
One of the most terrifying images in history: a transformation from life to death. Gaza in 2023 and 2026!
Hasan alrabay tweet media
English
12K
67.6K
152.2K
10.8M
bjr229 retweetledi
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
RAIR Foundation USA founder Amy Mekelburg just delivered a BRUTAL truth to Congress: "Islam is a hostile totalitarian political ideology using our freedoms to destroy us. To every non-Muslim, it offers three choices: convert, submit, or die." "It does not stop until every court, every school, and every government on earth is under Sharia." "These networks operate more than 8,000 Islamic nonprofits across America, including 650 in Texas alone." "They have no plan of assimilating." We MUST stop importing Islam to the West. It is a Trojan Horse meant to destroy us.
English
1.5K
17.6K
43.4K
819.5K
bjr229 retweetledi
Robert W Malone, MD
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD·
The United States has: • 683,000+ heart disease deaths/year • 620,000+ cancer deaths/year • 250,000+ estimated deaths from medical error Yet public health officials are running national fear campaigns about backyard chickens, raw milk, pet turtles, and hantavirus. That is not rational public health prioritization. That is theater.
English
256
4.8K
12.7K
120K
bjr229 retweetledi
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Professor Gad Saad: ‘Say Goodbye To America, it’s all Over’ Gad Saad says America will fall to Islam, and we will allow it to happen He categorizes it as a “Stage 4 cancer” “We are approaching stage 4, but there is a cure. Here's where I get pessimistic. The problem is that there is no indication that the West has the stomach and the testicular fortitude to actually implement what is easily available. So for example, when it comes to immigrants, any immigrant that belongs to an ideology that has tenets that are contrary to the Western tradition, that ideology should be banned. And you can't use the freedom of religion argument to render us all impotent as we go to the abyss of infinite lunacy. So there is a way to solve it. I worry that nobody has the ability to do so” What he’s talking about is Hijrah (Islamic migration for conquest), combined with higher birth rates and exploiting Western freedoms and guilt against itself He says Islamist theorists have openly declared this strategy, and the West lacks the testicular fortitude to respond with ideological vetting and bans on doctrines opposing liberal democracy. Mainly sharia supremacism There is a “cure” - Ban immigration from groups whose core ideology conflicts with Western traditions - Reject “freedom of religion” as a shield for supremacist political ideologies - Prioritize cultural compatibility over empathy signaling Literally common sense
English
1.6K
12.9K
30.9K
617.6K
bjr229 retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just defended America better than every politician in Washington combined. Musk: “After World War 2, the US could have basically taken over the world and any country. Like we got nukes, nobody else got nukes. We don’t even have to lose soldiers. Which country do you want?” One nation on earth held a weapon nobody else had. Total dominance. Zero competition. No risk of retaliation. Every empire in history that held that kind of advantage used it. Rome. The Mongols. The British. The Ottomans. They conquered until they collapsed. America had a bigger advantage than all of them combined. And it rebuilt the countries it just defeated. Musk: “The United States actually helped rebuild countries. So it helped rebuild Europe, it helped rebuild Japan. This is very unusual behavior, almost unprecedented.” Almost unprecedented? It had never happened before. Not once in 5,000 years of recorded history. The Marshall Plan wasn’t foreign aid. It was the most radical act of restraint any superpower ever committed. America turned its enemies into allies. Turned rubble into economies. Turned surrender into partnership. Germany went from ashes to the economic engine of Europe in a generation. Japan went from unconditional surrender to the third largest economy on earth. Three years after the war, America was flying food into Berlin. A city in the heart of the nation that just tried to destroy it. That’s not policy. That’s a civilization deciding what it is at the exact moment it has the power to be anything. You’re being told a story right now. That America is the villain of history. You hear it everywhere. Media. Universities. Social platforms. Musk: “There’s always like, well America’s done bad things. Well of course America’s done bad things, but one needs to look at the whole track record.” Every nation on earth has dark chapters. Every single one. The difference is what a country does when nobody can stop it. And when nobody could stop America, it fed its enemies and rebuilt their cities. Musk: “The history of China suggests that China is not acquisitive. Meaning they’re not going to go out and invade a whole bunch of countries.” Probably right. China has historically built walls, not fleets. But the real question isn’t about borders anymore. We’re approaching a moment that mirrors 1945 in ways nobody has fully processed yet. AI is going to give a handful of people a power advantage that makes nuclear monopoly look quaint. If someone is going to hold that kind of power, who do you want it to be? The country that conquered when it could? Or the one that rebuilt when it didn’t have to? Every alliance. Every trade route. Every economy. Billions lifted out of poverty. All of it traces back to one act of restraint that had never been done before. And carries no guarantee of being repeated. The most powerful thing America ever did wasn’t building the bomb. It was what it didn’t do after.
English
1.7K
16.7K
51.5K
1.4M
bjr229
bjr229@bjr2291·
@charliebilello The FED is trapped. Inflation rising says raise interest rates, but the cost of financing the national debt requires keeping interest rates low. The economy and job market are soft, suggesting lower rates. In other words we are likely to see stagflation
English
0
0
5
171
Charlie Bilello
Charlie Bilello@charliebilello·
US CPI Inflation Rate moved up to 3.8% in April, its highest level since May 2023. The Inflation Rate is now back above the Fed Funds Rate and CPI is likely headed above 4%. The Fed is once again behind the curve and should be hiking interest rates.
Charlie Bilello tweet media
English
45
73
339
100.9K