Sabitlenmiล Tweet
โItโs easy. You can do it yourself. Alone or with a few trusted comrades. Complicated means are not necessary. Not even great technical knowledge.โ
- Bonanno
English
๐๐๐ฅ๐-๐๐ฆ๐๐๐
7.3K posts
๐๐๐ฅ๐-๐๐ฆ๐๐๐
@boguswaves1
"๐ ๐ถ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ค ๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ข ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฃ ๐ญ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ซ ๐ถ๐ฌ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ซ๐ฑ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฏ๐ข๐ณ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐ถ ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ถ ๐ก๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ถ."
Anarchy Katฤฑlฤฑm Nisan 2025
263 Takip Edilen730 Takipรงiler
By "communists/the party" here they don't mean communists in general, but a very specific type of communist, which is ironic
PK Gandakin ๐ชฟ ๐ฉ@pkgandakin
Sectarianism is not intra left org fighting. Ultra leftists have co-opted the term sectarianism to mean that so you donโt get mad at them when they do actual sectarianism, which is defined as pursuing a politics of breaking with the masses and isolating the communists/ the party
English
unfortunately we have more communist lawyers than communist criminals
๐ป๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธยทSโถLIKOแ๐ฉ๐ด๐@TheSalikino
Communists need to go to college. We need communist doctors. We need communist lawyers. We need communist chemists. Above all, we NEED communists in the classrooms reminding their peers that not everyone thinks the same. Takes one mind to change thousands. :3
English
@TheSalikino @my_bearhands That's bourgeois
English
Someone remind me: for Marx, is a thing that is produced by a person specifically for use-value, not as exchange value (commodity) also an alien thing to the producer? Or is it only alien when produced as the latter?
English
@boguswaves1 but im the asshole for pointing out the obvious drive to protect (or otherwise create space for) abuse
English
I would like it if we could all be clearer in what we mean.
English
ZXX
@uterinethoughts Read some of his writing like a decade ago. One of the early eco-Marxists. I think the book was Capitalism and the Web of Life where he outlines his position on Marxist ecology
English
@boguswaves1 You familiar with him?
English
This reads to me as an attempt to make 'Man' and nature as one while still maintaining a separation btwn the two: "lives on nature", "continuous interchange", "linked to nature".
Karl Marx@marxhaunting
Man lives on nature โ means that nature is his body, with which he must remain in continuous interchange if he is not to die. That manโs physical and spiritual life is linked to nature means simply that nature is linked to itself, for man is a part of nature.
English
@uterinethoughts He's got to justify his whole academic career lol
English
ZXX
@uterinethoughts Moore's post on it?
English
@boguswaves1 Right? I was so confused by the other guy. It's not an outlandish thing to say
English
@dipperdesperado Yeah! I can't imagine that being clear about what we think and want would have any concrete applications!
English
@boguswaves1 yeah especially as this kind of stuff is just "abstract" or "philosophical" or wtv enough for people to reject dealing with it head-on <333333 love it sm
English
ZXX
Even if he tried to make the two into one, his language betrays that, leading to a kind of weird passage to me where 'Man' is both nature itself and separate from nature. (And this is without getting into 'Man' at all)
English
@dipperdesperado I suppose that's not happening any time soon๐ญ
English
@boguswaves1 that would require people to be bold enough to not hide behind ambiguity so that they can garner the benefits of intentional ambiguity without any of the accountability
English
@boguswaves1 bcs ppl don't care about misogyny or rape culture and continue to boost his platform!
English
Imagine thinking that you not only can't, but won't, learn as you go. As if you already figured out that which cannot be figured out before hand. The arrogance is astounding
Suburb Septembriseur@primarycatdad
"Just act, we have to do something" and "don't worry, you can learn as you go" are both self destructive deviations that belong to a petty bourgeois understanding of building a lasting revolutionary organization
English
The two worst people you know are fighting
Workshops4Gaza@Workshops4Gaza
Some of the most valuable people in the struggle against slavery were white people...lol. Palestinians, Iranians, Lebanese, Iraqis will free themselves. It's not "zog theory" to say the ones benefiting most from slavery or imperialism wont lead the struggle against them.
English
@ARSONIST_WOLF It is a biologically essentialist position, a humanist (bad) position, and a eugenic one that seeks to 'fix' problems of people
English
@ARSONIST_WOLF That's not transhumanism. People have always altered their bodies. Transhumanism is much more than that. It is an idea about what is human and how it should be 'evolved' to something (they think is a) better (human).
English
The problem with transhumanism has nothing to do with whether or not someone wants to change their body. It is fundamentally an essentialist, eugenic project that presupposes a particular form of human
๐ Thyme ๐ต๐ธ๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ๐ด@ARSONIST_WOLF
TRANSHUMANISM DISCOURSE YAYY i think for most people "oh you shouldnt change your body!!! you should love it the way it is!!" is the same type of thinking that liberals have regarding "nooo you're too radical and complain all the time!!! be grateful for what we have!!"
English