punloka

Good read

யோவ் வினோத்.. என்னயா உலக அரசியல இவ்ளோ ஈசியா சொல்லிப்புட்ட 💯🫡

@its_Moonveil Pic sutukiren 🫠

Yes itz hard to take, But itz necessary to take 💔🥀

Yet the original post ignored it and gave DMK full credit, as though it alone built the state’s entire medical education infrastructure. See it and decide for yourself who has brain and who flushed it out in Arivalayam toilet

“Mallumatti.” Truly nauseating to see someone spew hatred against an entire caste just because they disagree and then turn around and label everyone else as casteist. I already posted the data showing that other govt contributed more to the expansion of medical infra.

Honestly, I had zero interest in replying, because it’s unlikely to be accepted—or even debated—unless it fits your narrative. But just because i questioned DMK, ivlo vanmatha kottum bodhu. I'd rather not stay silent I rest my case here.

There’s more data I could share, but this thread is already long enough. I’m not trying to portray NEET as a saint. It has its flaws, and they deserve discussion. But reducing the debate to “remove NEET” to serve a political narrative is absurd.

Muttu #4: “NEET is anti-poor and anti-govt school.” I’ve already covered enough on the condition of government school and poor students before NEET. The 7.5% reservation and better coaching by previous govts have already narrowed that gap.

But rewriting history to make it sound like DMK alone built these infra while conveniently forgetting every other government that added these institutions? That’s some impressive selective memory.

Google it and understand the reality !! Lol, When I pointed out this, only got kannoli ponnoli thittams as reply

But that premise itself is factually incorrect, because the All India Quota existed long before NEET was introduced. To be honest, I would have had absolutely no issue if it had simply said “the Tamil Nadu government.”+

MUTTU #3 “DMK painstakingly built Tamil Nadu’s medical infrastructure” claim… The context here is clearly about medical college seats and how other state kaarans are occupying it unfairly post NEET.

And if federal rights were truly the priority, why wasn’t there a serious push to move education back to the State List during 2004–2013, when DMK was part of the UPA government and held influential positions at the Centre? READ OOPIES READ !!

2. Education is in the Concurrent List (Entry 25), but it is subject to Union List Entry 66, which empowers Parliament to determine national standards in higher education. 3. NEET by itself, does not take away the autonomy of private or minority institutions.+

In 2016, the Supreme Court made NEET compulsory by upholding these regulations. 1. A uniform national entrance test helps maintain merit-based standards across medical institutions.+

It wasn’t just TN. States such as AP, KN, and even Gujarat also sought legal relief, citing practical difficulties in implementing NEET at that stage. So NEET was same as it is today when proposed in 2010 as well+

The amendment brought in by the very party that was once your alliance partner—the same party you proudly welcomed with, “Nehru-vin magale varuga, nilaiyana aatchi tharuga.”+

Muttu#2 NEET is coervice. Making it compulsory is attack on federalism If that’s your position, then your disagreement is really with the constitution+

But apparently, Cabinet berths were important enough for that not to happen. மீனுக்கும் ஆசை, கூழுக்கும் ஆசை.+

In fact DMK had more leverage than any other state, as they were part of the UPA alliance. If they truly believed NEET would hurt TN, they could have made it a red line or even threatened to pull the plug on the UPA.+

If that’s the case, why did the DMK government seek legal relief and continue to proudly claim, even today, that it was the first to oppose NEET?+