zefram.eth

9.6K posts

zefram.eth banner
zefram.eth

zefram.eth

@boredGenius

Building

The Moon Katılım Temmuz 2015
2.1K Takip Edilen25.3K Takipçiler
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
@spengrah not really convinced, AI labs are highly incentivized to buy/steal every piece of data on the planet and integrate it directly into the base LLMs. a piece of proprietary data has near zero marginal value when you have everything every human ever produced in the model params.
English
1
0
1
53
spengrah.eth
spengrah.eth@spengrah·
@boredGenius the scarce resource will be proprietary data/context i think there's a chance that, in some scenarios / use cases / workloads, proprietary data is a sticky enough point of integration that a valuable (hireable) agent can be built around it
English
2
0
0
21
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
What will agents actually pay for? If it’s paying for APIs or products like a human would, then it’s quite boring. My agent paying for my flights is only marginally better than me doing it myself, if not worse. Agents won’t hire other agents either. If not these, then what?
English
7
0
12
1.6K
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
@spengrah Base models will get good enough (if they're not already good enough) so that it can do anything by itself or with orchestration. Agents hiring agents adds unnecessary friction & not much benefits.
English
1
0
2
26
spengrah.eth
spengrah.eth@spengrah·
@boredGenius curious to hear more about why you think agents won't hire other agents i've been going back and forth about this myself
English
1
0
1
51
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
Incredibly based, burgers keep winning
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄@RyanSAdams

THEY DID IT. The SEC and CFTC just dropped a landmark document that officially classifies crypto assets. They're actually telling us which crypto assets are securities and which ones aren't - by name! THIS IS SOMETHING GENSLER REFUSED TO DO (he focused on prosecuting crypto out of existence) This rule doc gives crypto many of the benefits of the clarity bill - it lifts us out of the gray market - it gives every asset a path. It's almost like the Clarity act just passed by way of regulator. (of course, the actual clarity act will harden all this into legislation and make it irreversible in the event we get another Gensler, we still want it) This rule says there's 5 categories for crypto assets: 1) Digital Commodities - assets tied to a functional, decentralized crypto system (e.g., BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOGE). Not securities. (yes, they name them on page 14) 2) Digital Collectibles - NFTs, meme coins, artwork tokens, in-game items. Not securities (fractionalized collectibles may be an exception). 3) Digital Tools - membership tokens, credentials, domain names (e.g., ENS). Not securities. 4) Stablecoins - payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not securities. Other stablecoins, it depends. 5) Digital Securities - tokenized versions of traditional securities. Like tokenized stocks. Always securities. Amazing! This makes so much sense I can't believe it's coming from a regulator. No more enforcement threats to Ethereum developers and crypto exchanges. How about the Howey test? More common sense! If an issuer makes specific promises of managerial efforts from which buyers expect profits, the offering is a security until those promises are fulfilled. Then it's a commodity. The asset itself was never the security, the deal around it was. (E.g. XRP was a security pre launch, became a commodity after). How about stuff like staking and mining? Mining? Not a securities transaction. Staking? Also not a securities transaction, that includes custodial and liquid staking even with LSTs! How about wrapping BTC? Not a securities transaction. Airdrops? NOT SECURITIES. NO MORE GEO BANS PROTECTING AMERICANS from free airdrops. Remember this is a joint doc from the SEC and CFTC, They're actually cooperating on this, no internal strife, this is binding to both. SEC regulates $80-100 trillion assets CFTC regulates $5-10 trillion assets Both of the world's largest capital markets are showing us that crypto assets are here to stay and they're welcome alongside traditional assets. Every country will follow. This is the biggest move toward legitimacy I've seen in all my time in crypto. Maybe bigger than the genius act since is covers all crypto assets. Well done @MichaelSelig and @SECPaulSAtkins. And especially well done to the indefatigable @HesterPeirce. Her fingerprints are all over this, couldn't have happened without her eight years of principles-based curiosity.

English
0
0
2
1.2K
zefram.eth retweetledi
f4lc0n
f4lc0n@al_f4lc0n·
I Saved Injective's $500M. They Pay Me $50K. I like hunting bugs on @immunefi . I'm decent at it. - #1 — Attackathon | Stacks - #2 — Attackathon | Stacks II - #1 — Attackathon | XRPL Lending Protocol - 1 Critical and 1 High from bug bounties (not counting this one) Life was good. Then I found a Critical vulnerability in @injective . This vulnerability allowed any user to directly drain any account on the chain. No special permissions needed. Over $500M in on-chain assets were at risk. I reported it through Immunefi. The next day, a mainnet upgrade to fix the bug went to governance vote. The Injective team clearly understood the severity. Then — silence. For 3 months. No follow up. No technical discussion. Nothing. A few days ago, they notified me of their decision: $50K. The maximum payout for a Critical vulnerability in their bug bounty program is $500K. I disputed it. Silence again. No explanation for the reduced payout. No explanation for the 3 month ghost. No conversation at all. To be clear: the $50K has not been paid either. I've seen others share bad experiences with bug bounty payouts recently. I never thought it would happen to me. I can't force them to do the right thing. But I won't let this be forgotten. I will dedicate 10% of all my future bug bounty earnings to making sure this story stays visible — until Injective pays what I deserve. Full Technical Report: github.com/injective-wall…
English
518
527
4.5K
1.8M
zefram.eth retweetledi
SAIR
SAIR@SAIRfoundation·
SAIR’s first community mathematics competition begins on March 14 at 15:09:26 (UTC+14), 2026. That marks the earliest place on Earth to reach the π-inspired moment 3.1415926. More details soon.
English
1
9
65
69.4K
Andreas Bigger
Andreas Bigger@andreaslbigger·
Introducing Edge, a high level, strongly statically typed, multi-paradigm domain specific language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). github.com/refcell/edge-rs
English
56
63
653
93.9K
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
Just found out my CallMe plugin for letting Claude Code call you on the phone is now part of @openclaw and powering millions of AI agents🤯 💕Open Source Power💕
zefram.eth tweet media
English
8
0
23
1.1K
zefram.eth retweetledi
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Bro, this is wrong. Lengthening the feedback distance between humans and AIs is not a good thing for the world. Today, it means you're generating slop instead of solving useful problems for people. It's not even well-optimized for helping people have fun. Once AI becomes powerful enough to be truly dangerous, it's maximizing the risk of an irreversible anti-human outcome that even you will deeply regret. The point of ethereum is to set *us* free, not to create something else that goes off and does some stuff freely while our own situation is unchanged or worsened. (And, as others have pointed out, the models are run by openai and anthropic, so the thing is not even "self-sovereign"; you're actually perpetuating the mentality that centralized trust assumptions can be put in a corner and ignored, the very mentality that ethereum is at war with) The exponential will happen regardless of what any of us do, that's precisely why this era's primary task is NOT to make the exponential happen even faster, but rather to choose its direction, and avoid collapse into undesirable attractors.
English
424
317
3.6K
560K
zefram.eth retweetledi
eden
eden@eden_·
overheard crypto bro: "no one even cares about decentralization" if that is true (which it isn't) then wtf are we even doing here in this industry? that is literally the entire point of all of this.
English
170
36
558
59.6K
zefram.eth
zefram.eth@boredGenius·
@AzFlin @8004_scan TBH it’s a bad standard and it’s a good thing nobody uses it Doing onchain yelp reviews is directionally hopeless and broken, easily sybilable, points system is meaningless and pure noise, etc etc It’s ERC-slop in the worst way
English
0
0
1
151
AzFlin 🌎
AzFlin 🌎@AzFlin·
uhh is there basically like no adoption for erc-8004? I just spent some time 1) learning how 8004 even works and 2) browsing the top 8004 agents via @8004_scan Will give a brief technical explanation of it, and then comment on its adoption. Technical Guide: ERC8004's core smart contract address is `0x8004A169FB4a3325136EB29fA0ceB6D2e539a432` and is deployed on many EVM chains, particularly mainnet & base It's like onchain yellow pages for AI agents. Anyone can call register() to register their AI agent. After registering, you get minted an NFT (symbol = $AGENT) and can update its metadata to whatever you wish. Your agent's metadata describes it's capabilities, ie its MCP URL, its website, email etc. Here is the metadata json for @captain_dackie: So at it's core, it's extremely simple. You publish your agent into a registry onchain and others can find you, and also leave you reviews (reputation system). Adoption: 8004scan indexes all this into their UI and assigns each agent a score. I took a look at the top agents... almost nothing. The top two ranked ERC8004 agents are random memey meerkat ones. I see 0 big web2 names or products here at all. Even big crypto projects I haven't seen registered. Has @aixbt_agent even registered an ERC8004? Maybe I'm just not looking correctly or hard enough? I think an onchain registry for AI agents is a fine idea, but if no-one in our industry is even using it, that's very sad.
AzFlin 🌎 tweet mediaAzFlin 🌎 tweet mediaAzFlin 🌎 tweet media
English
60
9
162
24.1K
zefram.eth retweetledi
Yogi
Yogi@Houseofyogi·
Unrealized gains tax for Gen-Z: You buy a Pokémon card for $50. Someone offers you $500 for it. You say no. You love that card. You're keeping it. The government says: "Cool, but that card is worth $500 now. You owe us $100 in taxes." You: "…I didn't sell it." Government: "Don't care. Pay up." You don't have $100 lying around. So you're forced to sell the card you love just to pay a tax on money you never received. Next month? That card drops back to $50. Your card is gone. Your money is gone. And the government shrugs. That's a wealth tax on unrealized gains. They don't pay you back the tax... Now picture this. Your mom calls you crying. She has to sell the house she raised you in. Not because she can't afford it. She's lived there 30 years. It's paid off. But some website says it's worth more now and the government says she owes $15,000 she doesn't have. So she sells your childhood home. The kitchen where she made you breakfast. The doorframe where she marked your height every birthday. Gone. To pay a tax on money that was never real. Now picture the opposite. Your dad put everything into his small business. For 20 years he built it from nothing. One year the business is "valued" at $2 million on paper. He owes a massive tax bill. He empties his savings. Sells his truck. Borrows money. Pays it. Next year the market crashes. His business is worth $200,000. He lost everything to pay a tax on a number that doesn't exist anymore. Does the government give him his money back? No. Does the government give him his truck back? No. Does the government care? No. They sold this idea as "taxing billionaires." But billionaires have armies of lawyers, offshore accounts, and trusts. They'll be fine. You know who won't be fine? Your mom. Your dad. Your neighbor with a small business. The farmer down the road who's had the same land for four generations and now has to sell it because dirt got expensive. You're not taxing wealth. You're taxing people for owning things. It's like getting a parking ticket for a car you might drive somewhere someday. They want you to own nothing and be happy. To fund the fraud, waste and abuse of the welfare state they created. There is enough money. More tax isn't needed. It's all a lie. But you've been gaslit into believing this is a rich vs poor debate. I hope you understand what's at stake.
English
3.9K
38.7K
138.7K
6M
eric
eric@Ugbuericsam·
so far in AMM design we have: - full range xyk - stableswap - concentrated liquidity - programmatic shifting token weight - repurposing idle LP assets - privacy - external oracle inputs - new execution methods (twamm) ...? feels like the AMM design space has been fully explored. what else is there left?
English
24
2
76
6.6K