brian

4.1K posts

brian banner
brian

brian

@brian_from_1999

26 / cs @georgiatech / open source contributor

a better future Katılım Aralık 2016
317 Takip Edilen237 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
These days, I’m letting god handle all things above me.
English
1
0
11
2.7K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@encrypted Get verified via cyber no issues for me anymore
English
0
0
5
319
jason
jason@jxnlco·
has and one made a great skill to have codex do deep research with subagents etc
English
28
1
201
21.9K
JSKitty
JSKitty@JSKitteh·
I regret to inform the community that all that the source code for Vector has been leaked. This has been tough on the team, most likely, it's being auctioned on the dark web. 🧵 Whoever purchases it will regret it for the reasons in this thread.
GitHub@github

1/ We are sharing additional details regarding our investigation into unauthorized access to GitHub's internal repositories. Yesterday we detected and contained a compromise of an employee device involving a poisoned VS Code extension. We removed the malicious extension version, isolated the endpoint, and began incident response immediately.

English
55
79
1.7K
1.2M
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.
English
4.8K
12K
130.9K
23.9M
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@Lovable > gaslight > get called out > backtrack
English
0
0
0
65
Lovable
Lovable@Lovable·
We’re sorry our initial statement didn't properly address our mistake. Here's what a public project on Lovable means, and how we got to where we are today: In the early days, people didn't know what Lovable was capable of. So we wanted to make it easy to explore what others were building, as a way to spark ideas and lower the barrier to getting started. Like scrolling GitHub or Dribbble: you browse projects to see what's possible, then go build your own. When you create a project on GitHub, you can make it private or public. Lovable worked the same. Users had a "Public" or "Private" option right in the chatbox. A public project meant the entire project was public, both chat and code. “Just like a public project on GitHub," we thought. Over time, we realized this was confusing. Many users thought "public" just meant others could see their published app, not the chat of an unpublished project. That's reasonable. On the free tier, users originally couldn't create private projects. They had to upgrade to a paid plan to do so. In May 2025, we changed this: users on the free tier could choose to make their projects private. For enterprise customers, the public visibility setting was disabled altogether. And in December 2025, we switched to private by default across all tiers. We also retroactively patched our API so public project chats couldn't be accessed, no matter what. Unfortunately, in February, while unifying permissions in our backend, we accidentally re-enabled access to chats on public projects. This was reported through our vulnerability disclosure program (via HackerOne). Unfortunately, the reports were closed without escalation because our HackerOne partners thought that seeing public projects’ chats was the intended behaviour. Upon learning this, we immediately reverted the change to make all public projects’ chats private again. We appreciate the researchers who uncovered this. We understand that pointing to documentation issues alone was not enough here. We’ll do better.
Lovable@Lovable

We were made aware of concerns regarding the visibility of chat messages and code on Lovable projects with public visibility settings. To be clear: We did not suffer a data breach. Our documentation of what “public” implies was unclear, and that’s a failure on us. Specifically for public projects, chat messages used to be visible — this is now no longer possible. When it comes to code of public projects: That is intentional behavior. We have experimented with different UX for how the build history is surfaced on public projects, but the core behavior has been consistent and by design. Importantly, for enterprise customers, being able to set visibility to public for new projects has been disabled since May 25, 2025.

English
150
87
988
384K
Lovable
Lovable@Lovable·
We were made aware of concerns regarding the visibility of chat messages and code on Lovable projects with public visibility settings. To be clear: We did not suffer a data breach. Our documentation of what “public” implies was unclear, and that’s a failure on us. Specifically for public projects, chat messages used to be visible — this is now no longer possible. When it comes to code of public projects: That is intentional behavior. We have experimented with different UX for how the build history is surfaced on public projects, but the core behavior has been consistent and by design. Importantly, for enterprise customers, being able to set visibility to public for new projects has been disabled since May 25, 2025.
English
273
138
1.4K
1.2M
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@spectre0799 @Kurrco Ya I heard that shi right away, was wondering if anyone else noticed it
English
0
0
4
347
Spectre
Spectre@spectre0799·
@Kurrco Has the exact same drum sample as Sing About Me (Use Me by Bill Withers)
English
4
0
230
7.7K
Kurrco
Kurrco@Kurrco·
NEW BABY KEEM SNIPPET 🚨 "Wasim Life" ...featuring PinkPantheress? 🤔
English
81
329
6.4K
202.4K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@ns123abc >nik get's criticism >nik apologizes >nik is good >nik continues to post high quality content
English
0
0
1
85
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
Dear all, apologies if my posts or brand comes across as biased at times. In all honestly, it’s not easy to counter a false narrative without sometimes being a bit extreme or careless with my words. I am committed to post high quality content and maximizing towards truth. There’s a lot more value I am capable to contribute and I am working hard to showcase that. Thank you for understanding. If you are able, please support my work by subscribing to my creator page: x.com/ns123abc/creat…
English
40
4
212
8K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
Live now at: traveltsa.com - covering 27 major airports, with 18 publishing live TSA wait times right now, plus checkpoint-hours coverage for more and flight lookup tools to help you time your trip better. Adding more and more support soon. Hope you like it!
English
0
0
0
94
Kunsa
Kunsa@Kunsa381844·
@derekmeegan @sawyerhood yes but it was glm, and its license allows that. While kimi is released with modified MIT, and the modification is that if they used this model they have to display it somewhere. They couldve just named it "Composer 2 (kimi k2.5)" and that would be fine.
English
1
0
4
118
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@benhylak @leerob Ya, I do not get it either even if they're using an inference partner (Fireworks in this case) -- Composer 2 is still a derivative of Kimi 2.5 The clause me and you are referring to: "If the Software (or any derivative works thereof) is used for any of your commercial..."
English
0
0
0
31
ben hylak
ben hylak@benhylak·
@leerob I don't get it! is there somewhere i can read more about inference partner terms
English
2
0
4
306
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@mickeyxfriedman @tekbog I don't know if it's hating as much as it's possibly violating licensing agreements. It's an open source model under a modified MIT License that specifically addresses scenarios like this A clause exists that explicitly applies to RL setups such as Composer 2
English
1
0
3
151
mickey friedman
mickey friedman@mickeyxfriedman·
@tekbog everyone loves to hate the top startup picking over everything they do. it’s sad.
English
2
0
13
1.7K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@leerob Under Kimi K2.5's Modified MIT License, derivatives must prominently attribute the base model if monthly revenue exceeds $20M; Cursor's estimated at $167M/month ARR So why only after the fact?
English
0
1
26
2.9K
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
Since people really want me to say this: "KIMI K2.5" ‼️ Yes, that is the base we started from. And we are following the license through inference partner terms (e.g. Fireworks) I'm thankful for OSS models personally, good for the ecosystem.
English
98
91
1.8K
403.5K
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
Yep, Composer 2 started from an open-source base! We will do full pretraining in the future. Only ~1/4 of the compute spent on the final model came from the base, the rest is from our training. This is why evals are very different. And yes, we are following the license through our inference partner terms.
fynn@fynnso

was messing with the OpenAI base URL in Cursor and caught this accounts/anysphere/models/kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast so composer 2 is just Kimi K2.5 with RL at least rename the model ID

English
352
203
2.8K
1.5M
Charlie Wu
Charlie Wu@charliewu·
We’re growing FAST here @orchard_robots and hiring across our engineering team: – Robotics Software Engineer 🤖 – Perception & Localization 🗺️ – Machine Learning Engineer 🚜 ... as we scale to serve many of America's leading farms, and build the future of farming! 🍎
English
8
5
134
20.4K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
prediction: @thsottiaux is going to be resetting limits again with the influx of users from Claude Code being down
English
0
0
1
213
George Pickett
George Pickett@georgepickett·
Ding. Ooo a text my my gf!!! Not “how’s your day?” Not a meme. Yeah… I think I’ve found the one
George Pickett tweet media
English
5
0
19
1.7K
brian
brian@brian_from_1999·
@thsottiaux curious whether increased /fast usage has broader effects on total compute capacity or mainly impacts the /fast pool itself ?
English
0
0
0
107
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
We are adding compute as fast as we can for Codex, but demand is surging faster than anticipated and service can be a little bit choppy for some. Team is working hard behind the scenes.
English
197
39
1.9K
117.7K