Brofrog21, Proud Proletarian

Hezbollah is turning churches in Lebanon into terror strongholds and putting Christian civilians in harm's way. Using places of worship to store weapons and launch attacks is a violation of international law.

Not a single perpetrator of the Miryang mass rape case was legally punished. However, the victims were recently booked by the police on defamation charges. Below is a description of the Miryang group rape. 44 male high school students gang-raped a 13-year-old girl. In January 2004, they assaulted her with an iron pipe, causing her to lose consciousness, and then collectively raped her. They recorded the act with a camcorder and used the footage to threaten her, subjecting her to repeated gang rapes for about a year. The police handling the case also made inappropriate remarks toward the victim, saying, “My hometown is Miryang. How dare you, someone who isn’t even from Miryang, cause such a commotion here?” They also asked, “Didn’t you seduce the boys first?” and stated, “The perpetrators are the future leaders of my Miryang.” Furthermore, the police exposed the victim’s identity. Ultimately, none of the 44 perpetrators faced legal consequences.

Get ready people. A third Independent party is unfolding. Time is up for the grotesque corruption of the GOP and DNC.

I told you, he’s destroying it all!!

خطاب قوي ممزوج بالدموع والبكاء على أطفال غزة! وزيرة خارجية أيسلندا تبكي متأثرة وتقول: "لقد عانى أطفال فلسطين ولا تزال سلامتهم الجسدية والنفسية تُنتهك بشكل غير مقبول. لا ينبغي أن يتعرض الأطفال لمعاملة لا إنسانية وإذا فشلنا أن نوقف معاناتهم فنحن فاشلون".

Hijab is a symbol of pride, not oppression.

взрослый мужик с целыми руками и ногами заливается слезами рассказывает как ему было тяжело продавать своих семилетних дочерей другим педофилам чтобы прокормить их лучше бы он своё очко продал но нет же ведь быть жертвой изнасилования это женская доля давайте его пожалеем

This is the UK in 2026 – where a woman with genuine, NHS-documented facial injuries gets arrested by the Metropolitan Police for the “crime” of reporting them. Sophie Mojsiejenko had visible, horrific bruising and swelling around her eye and face. She did the responsible thing: she reported the assault and even had a CT scan from the NHS that officially logged the injuries as real. Yet instead of investigating her attacker, officers broke down her door, stormed in, and seized her makeup – claiming she had somehow “painted on” the injuries herself to fake the whole thing. They arrested her. For reporting being hurt. This is obscene. A woman with medical proof of assault is treated like a criminal while the actual perpetrator walks free. The Met Police didn’t just get it wrong – they went full Gestapo mode: forced entry, property seizure, and an arrest designed to intimidate and silence. All because she dared to complain about a serious incident. How does this happen in Britain? When did our police stop protecting victims and start persecuting them? When did a CT scan from the NHS become less credible than officers playing amateur makeup detective? This isn’t policing – it’s abuse of power, plain and simple. It destroys public trust, terrifies ordinary people out of reporting crimes, and reeks of a two-tier system that protects the wrong people while punishing the innocent. Sophie’s story exposes a rotten culture inside the Met. If they can do this to a woman with hospital evidence, what are they doing to everyone else? Enough is enough. We need answers, accountability, and a complete overhaul before more victims are turned into suspects for simply telling the truth. The British public deserves better than this. 🇬🇧

Rep. Norman: January 6th was an issue that was made up in the first place. Reporter: Made up? Norman: That was a staged thing from day one. Reporter: The riot was staged? Your Republican colleagues barricaded themselves in their chamber. You think they were acting?

Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill To Abolish Super PACs: "Our government is on its way to becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of oligarchs. Billionaires would not be able to pour huge money into super PACs, and it would end the era of unlimited spending and put power back into hands of the people."

A Wharton economist ran a randomized controlled trial on almost a thousand high school students in Turkey. The result was so brutal for the AI-in-education narrative that it had to be peer-reviewed by PNAS before people would believe it. Her name is Hamsa Bastani. She teaches operations and information at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and the study she published in 2025 alongside her co-authors is one of the cleanest experiments anyone has run on what AI actually does to learning when you remove it from the equation and check what is left. The setup was a randomized controlled trial, the same methodology used in clinical drug trials. Nearly a thousand high school math students in Turkey were split into three groups and put through four sessions of ninety minutes each. One group practiced with GPT Base, a standard ChatGPT-4 interface that could answer any question directly. One group practiced with GPT Tutor, a version of the same model that had been prompted to guide students with hints rather than hand them the answer. One group practiced with nothing but their textbook and their own head. During the practice sessions, the AI groups looked like a miracle. The GPT Base group solved 48% more problems than the students working alone. The GPT Tutor group solved 127% more. Every administrator looking at those numbers would have written a press release about the transformative power of AI in education and moved on. Then the actual exam came, and AI was not allowed. The students who had practiced with GPT Base scored 17% worse than the students who had practiced alone. Seventeen percent worse, despite having solved nearly half again as many problems in the sessions leading up to it. The students who had struggled the most, who had sat with the confusion and worked through it without a tool to rescue them, were now the only ones who could actually do the math when it counted. Bastani's team read through the chat logs to understand what had actually been happening during the practice sessions, and the answer was exactly what the exam results had already implied. The GPT Base group had not been learning. They had been extracting answers and moving on, and every moment that felt like understanding was actually the model doing the cognitive work while the student's brain waited for the next problem to arrive. The paper describes it precisely: without guardrails, students attempt to use GPT-4 as a crutch during practice, and subsequently perform worse on their own. The detail that should follow every conversation about AI in education is the one buried in the post-test survey results. The students who had relied on AI the most during practice were also the most confident they had understood the material. The tool had not just failed to teach them. It had convinced them they had learned something they had not, which is a different kind of failure entirely and a much harder one to correct because the student has no idea it is happening. The crutch had made them confident and weak at the same time.