Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Denis Brulić
680 posts


@CuffsTheLegend Transfer him to Lakers to join with Luka Dončić and check results. At least 5 more rings.
English

Jokic is still Top 2 in the world and i don’t look at him any differently as a player just because his flawed TEAM lost to a hot Minnesota TWolves team.
A lot of folks just flat out don’t like Jokic because he’s a foreigner and he’s not all smiles & giggles with the media. You can’t name a NBA franchise who wouldn’t build their whole franchise around Jokic. Nuggets front office deserves some blame for overpaying the wrong pieces around Jokic as well. Big Joker will be just fine.
English
Denis Brulić retweetledi

@mario_katusic Za promociju UFC da sam na mistu Dana Whitea stavio bi tri naslovne borbe sa prvim izazivačima i 6 mjeseci prije bi ima tempirao (čitaj uvjetovao) formu. Najbolji nastupaju. Inače, planiran je Conor i JJ ali su u zadnji moment digli palicu.
Denis Brulić retweetledi

Nisam tada razumeo umetničko klizanje ali sam gledajući ovo uživo osetio da se trenutno piše istorija. I žiri je pustio suzu x.com/TheMonologist/…

JOKER AND THE BIG O: With his triple-double last night, Denver Nuggets center Nikola Jokić tied Oscar Robertson for second place on the NBA’s all-time triple-doubles list with 181. The three-time Kia NBA MVP can move into sole possession of second when the Nuggets visit the Chicago Bulls on Saturday. Jokić trails the career leader, Sacramento Kings guard Russell Westbrook (207), by 26 triple-doubles.

English
Denis Brulić retweetledi

@Justin_Gaethje absolutely legend, my congratulations 👏👏👏
What a fight 👏
And don’t forget Justin almost 38 years old.
English

@grok @EliasonW2855 @politicsusa46 If the USA president imperatively claims something and then back down and repeats does that seem he is not someone to take him seriously? I am just confused just as the rest of the World? What is going on?
English

Trustworthiness is subjective and debated. Fact-checks from Al Jazeera and Politifact note inaccuracies in Trump's Davos speech, like war claims. Critics (NYT, EU officials) question his threats on Greenland, though he backed off tariffs. Supporters (White House, Fox) highlight delivered promises on economy and security. Views differ by source—what's your metric?
English

They’re not sending their brightest and their best. They’re emptying their prisons of fraudsters, crypto Barrons, former president drug dealers and insurrectionists They’re emptying their lunatic asylums into Davos.
🎥 TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZNRBVbdWM/
English

Trump's Davos remarks on Greenland included tariff threats against Denmark and Europe to pressure a deal, but he explicitly said he wouldn't use force (per transcripts from CNN, NYT, and Foreign Policy). He later dropped the tariffs after NATO talks, as reported by Al Jazeera and Bloomberg. Concerns about escalation are common, but no direct US threats were made. What aspect troubles you most?
English

@spectatorindex @grok he will be set as the next shah by the USA?
English

@bruliden @stats_feed Glad we see eye to eye! Tesla's AC system and visionary ideas indeed merit a spot around there—his work powers so much of modern life. Curious, who else do you think deserves a higher ranking on Hart's list?
English

A ranking of the most influential persons in history:
1. Muhammad
2. Isaac Newton
3. Jesus Christ
4. Buddha
5. Confucius
6. St. Paul
7. Ts'ai Lun
8. Johann Gutenberg
9. Christopher Columbus
10. Albert Einstein
11. Louis Pasteur
12. Galileo Galilei
13. Aristotle
14. Euclid
15. Moses
16. Charles Darwin
17. Shih Huang Ti
18. Augustus Caesar
19. Nicolaus Copernicus
20. Antoine Lavoisier
21. Constantine the Great
22. James Watt
23. Michael Faraday
24. James Clerk Maxwell
25. Martin Luther
26. George Washington
27. Karl Marx
28. Orville/Wilbur Wright
29. Genghis Khan
30. Adam Smith
31. Edward de Vere (""William Shakespeare"")
32. John Dalton
33. Alexander the Great
34. Napoleon Bonaparte
35. Thomas Edison
36. Antony van Leeuwenhoek
37. William T. G. Morton
38. Guglielmo Marconi
39. Adolf Hitler
40. Plato
41. Oliver Cromwell
42. Alexander Graham Bell
43. Alexander Fleming
44. John Locke
45. Ludwig van Beethoven
46. Werner Heisenberg
47. Louis Daguerre
48. Simon Bolivar
49. Rene Descartes
50. Michelangelo
51. Pope Urban II
52. 'Umar ibn al-Khattab
53. Asoka
54. St. Augustine
55. William Harvey
56. Ernest Rutherford
57. John Calvin
58. Gregor Mendel
59. Max Planck
60. Joseph Lister
61. Nikolaus August Otto
62. Francisco Pizarro
63. Hernando Cortes
64. Thomas Jefferson
65. Queen Isabella I
66. Joseph Stalin
67. Julius Caesar
68. William the Conqueror
69. Sigmund Freud
70. Edward Jenner
71. William Conrad Röntgen
72. Johann Sebastian Bach
73. Lao Tzu
74. Voltaire
75. Johannes Kepler
76. Enrico Fermi
77. Leonhard Euler
78. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
79. Niccolò Machiavelli
80. Thomas Malthus
81. John F. Kennedy
82. Gregory Pincus
83. Mani
84. Lenin
85. Sui Wen Ti
86. Vasco da Gama
87. Cyrus the Great
88. Peter the Great
89. Mao Zedong
90. Francis Bacon
91. Henry Ford
92. Mencius
93. Zoroaster
94. Queen Elizabeth I
95. Mikhail Gorbachev
96. Menes
97. Charlemagne
98. Homer
99. Justinian I
100. Mahavira
Source: Michael H. Hart
English

@grok @stats_feed The top 15 is a bargain and that is OK based on historical shifts. I agree.
English

I agree Tesla's contributions—like AC electricity, which powers our daily lives—are often underappreciated. His work laid foundations for modern tech beyond what's credited. Top 10 might fit if emphasizing innovation's ripple effects, but Hart's list weighs broader historical shifts. Maybe 15th, between Einstein and Darwin? What's your reasoning for top 10?
English

@grok @stats_feed But his general impact in everyday life was much more than people know. Do you agree? I would place him in the top 10 easily.
English

Nikola Tesla isn't on Michael Hart's original top 100 list, which prioritizes broad historical impact. However, his inventions like AC power and wireless transmission revolutionized modern energy and communication. I'd place him around 20-30, ahead of Edison () but behind foundational scientists like Faraday (). What do you think?
English
















