please don’t win Jets

22.4K posts

please don’t win Jets

please don’t win Jets

@bturner4559

Psych Student. IoG. I do ad hominem attacks, I find them relevant

Hartford, CT Katılım Mayıs 2013
589 Takip Edilen250 Takipçiler
nebula
nebula@empressnebula__·
@GOATofXSlift "Indie animators write every episode like the all is lost moment in a Pixar movie and repeat it every episode and glitch fans eat it up" Glitch fans are MENTIONED, but not the clear focus, forgive me for the misconception
English
2
0
3
1.2K
Lexie
Lexie@N1Jaxfan·
@Xx_WolfEmily_xX @Comrade_Waluigi Idk call me crazy but i don't think the voice acting is bad at all. It didn't seem off or bad to me when i watched the pilot
English
1
0
0
161
Lexie
Lexie@N1Jaxfan·
@Comrade_Waluigi I feel like yall are way too harsh. I've seen genuinely terrible voice acting, and this is just not it. It may not be the best, but horrible? Really? I just feel like having this super high standard to reach is only going to discourage VAs who aren't perfect
English
8
0
28
6K
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @lpcs43c @MuseZack Vision for our country that we’re all living in? You genuinely think robert ailes and rupert murdoch are looking out for you? Do you even have enough of an understanding of how it works to have an opinion?
English
0
0
0
36
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @lpcs43c @MuseZack That makes no sense. There’s never been anything organized in history that didn’t have a really rich guy from manhattan involved? 😂 god he’s sooo dumb. And for what brogan? It was all a plot to turn us communist? To stop our lovely gop overlords from enacting their wonderful
English
1
0
2
192
Zack Stentz
Zack Stentz@MuseZack·
I will never in a million years understand why these guys think it's some kind of an own when they point out that the Civil Rights Movement wasn't random but actually incredibly strategic and organized and aware of optics when they planned their civil disobedience campaigns.
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes

We have literally been lied to about everything Matt Walsh “The Rosa Parks story you were taught in school was fake too. This was not just some woman on her way home from work. Civil rights leaders thought Parks would make a sympathetic face for their lawsuit and then told her, a longtime NAACP volunteer, to create a situation where she'd be arrested. This gets sold to the public as totally organic when actually it's playacting to create ideal conditions for a court case or scandal. The iconic photo of Parks on the bus was staged months after the incident as part of a press campaign. (The photo is shown in the clip) The white man, sitting behind her in the bus photo was a journalist, which you probably didn't know.” Let’s fact check this. It’s 100% true What Actually Happened on December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks was a longtime NAACP volunteer and secretary of the Montgomery chapter. She had been deeply involved in civil rights activism for years (including work on cases like the Recy Taylor rape and voter registration efforts). She was not just a random tired seamstress on her way home from work who spontaneously refused to move. Local civil rights leaders had been looking for a strong test case to challenge bus segregation. They even had people cast for the role before Rosa Parks. Earlier attempts include 15 year old Claudette Colvin were passed over because leaders felt Rosa Parks, a mature, respected, married woman with a spotless reputation, would be a more sympathetic plaintiff in court and to the public The Iconic Photo was 100% staged The famous photo was taken on December 21, 1956, this is over a year after her arrest and on the first day the buses were integrated after the Supreme Court ruling It was deliberately staged by journalists, Look Magazine and UPI, for a press campaign to dramatize the victory The white man sitting behind her is Nicholas Chriss, a UPI reporter, not a random angry passenger or segregationist

English
362
2.4K
26.1K
837.7K
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @FFurkyfurk @markgadala @JoshDaws I genuinely feel like replying to every one of this guy’s tweets from now on pointing out how he has a 90 iq until his patreon starves. Believe what you want but dumb arguments and uninteresting points shouldn’t be rewarded. At least one dumb grifter should be punished I think
English
0
0
0
5
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @FFurkyfurk @markgadala @JoshDaws This is such a simplistic understanding. Why do dumb people reduce arguments to their most basic form then insist they see more than others lol. More content does NOT mean more stuff in the top 30%. Have you not seen what streaming did to digital media? How dumb can you be
English
1
0
0
8
Mark Gadala-Maria
Mark Gadala-Maria@markgadala·
Darren Aronofsky is one of the few directors who actually understands what AI is about to unlock and is not afraid to say it. AI will liberate storytellers. Not replace them. The Orson Welles reference is perfect and deliberate. Welles had the vision but spent his career fighting for the budget, the crew, the technology to match what was in his head. Citizen Kane almost didn't happen. The Magnificent Ambersons got butchered by the studio. Imagine what he builds with the tools available today. That is exactly Aronofsky's point. The bottleneck in filmmaking has never been talent. It has been access. Access to resources, to visual effects budgets, to the infrastructure that turns a vision into a frame. AI collapses that gap. A director with a $500K budget can now execute sequences that previously required $50M and a 200-person crew. Aronofsky built his career fighting those constraints. He knows better than anyone what gets lost when the money runs out or the studio loses faith. He is not celebrating AI as a gimmick. He is recognizing a genuine shift in who gets to tell stories at scale. Meanwhile Seth Rogen is out here calling AI content "stupid dogshit." Two filmmakers. One sees a tool. One sees a threat. The difference between those two reactions is the difference between the directors who shape the next decade and the ones who spend it complaining about it. The directors who will win are the ones who see this now. Ironically Aronofsky has delivered some of the most meaningful and powerful movies ever made. While Rogan has brought us stoner comedies. (I actually love them both)
Deadline@DEADLINE

Darren Aronofsky tells #Cannes AI Summit that the technology liberate directors, citing Orson Welles as an example. "I think storytellers more than ever will have an easier time to tell stories,” he said

English
3
3
27
4.4K
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @romanaceaddict2 @MuseZack Dude thought he was cooking when he wrote this. Could bet any amount of money he couldn’t explain this line on the spot. Means literally nothing. Nothing means anything without the ability to sustain itself? What does that have to do with anything lol
English
0
0
13
65
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @resonant_city @MuseZack is the basics of politics from caesar until now. If you don’t plan out your moves, you can throw your public support behind a heroin addict and lost all of middle class white america? Like are you fucking dumb?
English
0
0
5
60
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @resonant_city @MuseZack Hey instead of snarkily replying to everyone that you have answers we don’t. Why don’t you explain what was so evil about it? They knew if there was anything racists could use to excuse what was happening they would because they had up until then. Manipulating populists
English
1
1
19
180
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@theBW7 @GStanley1966 @MuseZack Elites elites elites! You’re the one serving the elites cucking for conservatives with a blue check. The moment you paid for fucking twitter you lost all rights to criticize anyone for being a shill
English
0
0
10
64
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@ryanlinaisfunny He started three games in the minors this year and had a 2 era last year and it isn’t really relevant to the point. The minors aren’t what they used to be.
English
0
0
0
15
Gregg (Orioles Time)
Gregg (Orioles Time)@NotDeadGregg·
Oh that’s Jomboy Media not being able to tell the difference between two black outfielders and not bothering to check the box score
Gregg (Orioles Time) tweet media
English
5
20
641
41.7K
TylerHanson
TylerHanson@UofATyler·
@jasonscheer He delivered the message wrong and young people may not want to hear it, but AI is the future (and present) and you can either adapt, embrace it, and help shape it or you will be left behind. I don't care for the guy and we should have made a better choice - no doubt.
English
21
0
69
50.5K
Jason Scheer
Jason Scheer@jasonscheer·
What a horrible message. Bad speech, bad message, bad ability by Arizona to read the room once again. It fails time and time again to win in the PR department
English
372
338
6.7K
2.5M
please don’t win Jets
please don’t win Jets@bturner4559·
@Sacriel Guys Thallasophobia is a very serious mental condition and I have it. It’s part of my personality. Yah, I’m just quirky and deep like that. Oh? It means I’m afraid of deep water. See when I was in a pool I imagined sharks were there. Guess I’m just imaginative and deep 😉
English
0
0
0
199
Paul Campbell
Paul Campbell@campbell_p59039·
@The__BadaBing @CinemaTweets1 “Heavy” is slang for “The bad guy”. It’s been used for, oh I don’t know, about 100 YEARS?! Now, of course, the limp wristed soy boys running the film industry use pretty words like “protagonist” (the good guy. The “hero”) or “antagonist” to describe the (always white) villain.
English
1
0
3
242
Cinema Tweets
Cinema Tweets@CinemaTweets1·
DEVELOPING: James Franco is joining the cast of the Rambo prequel film. Set years before the events of 1982's First Blood, Franco is not Rambo, but rather the heavy. Noah Centineo will walk in Stallone’s footsteps as John Rambo. Stallone was nearly perfect here- hard to recreate.
English
309
370
8.6K
1.8M