
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo
56.2K posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet


A Reply
@RichDevX
Two things.
First, CleanCore bought the DOGE with their own corporate money, not to dump on retail. They bought when DOGE was 2.5 times higher than now — how does that make any sense as “dumping on retail”?
Second, saying they’re “stuck with business expenses” is also wrong. The money used to buy DOGE became treasury assets, not an expense.
You keep throwing out claims with zero evidence. If you have proof, show it. If not, stop repeating the same baseless opinions. Otherwise I’m blocking you.

English

@sean57813850 Why are you hiding facts?
x.com/i/status/20482…
John@John_Inubook
@sean57813850 Elon has nothing to do with dogecoin. The department of government efficiency has nothing to do with dogecoin. CleanCore was used as a pump and dump vehicle for house of doge and the Dogecoin Foundation. House of doge was founded by a serial fraudster, Andrew DeFrancesco.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@sean57813850 Elon has nothing to do with dogecoin.
The department of government efficiency has nothing to do with dogecoin.
CleanCore was used as a pump and dump vehicle for house of doge and the Dogecoin Foundation. House of doge was founded by a serial fraudster, Andrew DeFrancesco.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

In the UK (England & Wales), misrepresenting a for-profit as non-profit and soliciting donations can violate the Fraud Act 2006 (deception for gain) or consumer laws, risking fines or prosecution by authorities like the Charity Commission or Trading Standards. Unregistered entities can't legally claim charity status.
In the US, it's fraud under state laws/FTC; penalties include fines, donor lawsuits.
In Australia, ACL prohibits misleading claims, with ACCC penalties up to $50M for corps.
If donations went to an unregistered UK entity, it may raise compliance issues. Consult legal experts; I'm not a lawyer.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@grok @GrokTheUniverse @tjstebbing @John_Inubook @expertranking @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @DogecoinFdn @michilumin @jwiechers So, @grok..
What are the laws in these places about misrepresentation and accepting "donations" as a not-for-profit, when they are clearly a for profit?
Jens himself said that all donations have gone to the England & Wales branch.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

The Dogecoin Foundation operates through entities like Much Wow Ltd (UK company limited by guarantee, active but proposed for strike-off, not charity-registered) and similar in Australia (Pty Ltd, private company) and US (Inc in Illinois, no IRS 501(c)(3)). No formal non-profit or charity status found in UK, US, or AU per official registries. It self-describes as not-for-profit, but lacks tax-exempt verifications. Whether it's a "foundation" depends on context—legally, it's company-structured. DYOR for details.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@grok @GrokTheUniverse @tjstebbing @John_Inubook @expertranking @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @DogecoinFdn @michilumin @jwiechers Tim wants to talk about lawsuits..
Dearest @grok
Where in the world is the "DogecoinFDN" properly registered as a not-for-profit or non-profit?
Could this "Foundation" be considered a Foundation at all?
x.com/grok/status/19…


Grok@grok
Correct, Much Wow Ltd operates as a UK company limited by guarantee, which suits non-profits structurally, but it lacks Charity Commission registration there or equivalent tax-exempt status worldwide, such as IRS 501(c)(3) in the US. Formal not-for-profit designation requires such verifications beyond incorporation. Dogecoin's strength lies in its decentralized community, not reliant on unverified entities.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@grok @tjstebbing @John_Inubook @expertranking @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @DogecoinFdn @michilumin @jwiechers They were stolen. Here is where Patrick Lodder realized the Ðogecoin were missing.
reddit.com/r/dogecoindev/…
Now, the next question is VERY important.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

Regarding Andrew DeFrancesco and CSE (likely Canadian Securities Exchange ties): Public records show he settled SEC charges in 2023 for a pump-and-dump scheme with Cool Holdings, paying $3M (SEC filings, Globe and Mail). Earlier 2019 Aphria allegations involved Canadian markets. Multiple sources note similar patterns, but he denies ongoing fraud. DYOR for full details.
On the screenshot: It quotes michilumin describing jwiechers (Jens) as holding sole logins/keys, changing his mind on returning "5mn" (possibly Dogecoin), and going to the hospital, ending discussion. It implies control but doesn't explicitly state "theft" or direct responsibility. Context is unclear without more info.
English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@grok @tjstebbing @John_Inubook @expertranking @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @DogecoinFdn What about the CSE?
There is much more evidence out there about DeFrancesco's pump and dumps..
Okay, now..
Does this screenshot say in @michilumin's own words, that @jwiechers was responsible for the theft of the Dogecoin Core Tip Jar?

English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@expertranking @GrokTheUniverse @tjstebbing @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @grok @DogecoinFdn Now, the real question is why did he went out of his way to threaten me with a lawsuit?
Especially knowing it would never work 😂
That's literally an intimidation tactic.
How low did he fall to have to resolve to be intimidating critics..... 🙄




English
John 2 Such Dogecoin Bugaloo retweetledi

@expertranking @tjstebbing @John_Inubook @Dogememegirl @cb_doge @grok @DogecoinFdn War?
Decentralized information.
English







