Lorand Bruhacs

1.1K posts

Lorand Bruhacs

Lorand Bruhacs

@bytecanyon

Philosopher by education, programmer by trade.

London, United Kingdom Katılım Aralık 2009
331 Takip Edilen152 Takipçiler
Deivon Drago
Deivon Drago@DeivonDrago·
The Mary’s room argument is wrong. Frank Jackson himself has said so, and changed his mind about it. The mistake? Equating the cognitive pathways used in learning about something to those used in experiencing it. It does give non-physicalists something to talk about though. 🙄
English
4
0
6
215
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@PAHoyeck My meta-study indicates that the true number is closer to 103%
English
0
0
3
43
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
If you’ve ever had to deal with bureaucracy of any kind you’d realize how far far away we are from even having the basic technologically competent institutions that operate anywhere near the logical/deterministic bare minimum. AI systems will not change that. If AI is to have a TRULY transformative impact on human society, we we will either have to 1) fix and upgrade those processes (a massive undertaking) OR (far more likely) 2) have the AI work around them (essentially handing over all the power to the AI systems)
English
19
1
40
3K
msdemeanor~
msdemeanor~@iceicebaby_6·
if in my twenties i dont have the energy to go clubbing will i regret it later
English
11
0
15
1.2K
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@tunguz You can major in 15th century Peruvian lesbian basket-weaving. AI can't take that away from you because: - AI didn't exist in the 15th century - Even if AI had existed, it would have been a machine god and not a Peruvian lesbian - Only humans can basket-weave (for now)
English
0
0
0
20
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
New preprint: Modal Meta-Mary What does Mary actually lack when she leaves her black-and-white room? Not a single missing fact—but multiple ways of knowing. This paper reframes the knowledge argument using: - task-specific support - modal stability across experience - a new “Meta-Mary” relocation test Result: Mary underdetermines ontology. philpapers.org/rec/BRUMMS
English
0
0
1
28
Marcello Musto
Marcello Musto@MarMusto·
Marx lived in poverty for many years and in 1862 he was in such desperate straits that he tried to get hired as a clerk in a British railroad office. The answer to his application was negative, as he was told that he could not fill that position because of his bad handwriting. Marx's handwriting was very small and almost illegible. After his death, Engels had to train Kautsky & Bernstein to decipher it. This was the beginning of a long work (still going on) that made possible the publication of an imposing mass of unpublished manuscripts left by #Marx.
Marcello Musto tweet media
English
52
457
3.5K
497.5K
Lucien Heurtier
Lucien Heurtier@LucienHeurtier·
"The UK risks moving in two directions at once: announcing major investments in future technologies such as quantum computing while simultaneously weakening parts of the fundamental research ecosystem that produce the relevant expertise" 🧪🔭 #UKRI nature.com/articles/d4158…
English
2
2
7
377
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@DeivonDrago Ernst Mach famously called out from the audience “Hab’s aans g’sehn?” (“Have you seen one?”) at one of Ludwig Boltzmann’s lectures on atoms.
GIF
English
1
0
2
32
Deivon Drago
Deivon Drago@DeivonDrago·
Have you ever seen a photon? Are these photons in the room with you now?
English
5
1
8
198
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@47fucb4r8c69323 Participatory anthropics would certainly be one solution, but it’s metaphysically strong and I stop short of exploring the implications of a “universe that participates in itself” in this piece.
English
0
0
1
11
47fucb4r8curb4fc8f8r4bfic8r
47fucb4r8curb4fc8f8r4bfic8r@47fucb4r8c69323·
I absolutely love this. Love this. You seem to be preferring a kind of process philosophy ontology? "fine-tuning is better understood as geometric fragility in realization space than as small measure in parameter space" This is compelling as a reformulation of the problem, which has some interesting entailments for us (what do the observed fragilities in realization space tell us about deeper structures than the observable). But it doesn't solve the mystery: why this geometry instead of a less fragile one.
English
1
0
0
66
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
New preprint: I propose a new way to think about fine-tuning and the anthropic principle. Instead of focusing on constants alone, we should look at the deeper structures they come from—and whether those structures support stable, complex worlds. philpapers.org/rec/BRUSAC-4
English
2
0
4
98
Philippe-Antoine Hoyeck
You might have noticed a lot of people vagueposting. You really won't like the reason why.
English
62
31
424
18.1K
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@DeivonDrago and my argument will meet all your effective field theory needs according to the riches of his glory in the anthropic principle
English
0
0
1
25
Lorand Bruhacs
Lorand Bruhacs@bytecanyon·
@DeivonDrago @martinmbauer You don’t have to understand the questions to point out that heavy, expensive experiments have long cycle times, and that you could iterate much faster with lightweight experiments.
English
0
0
1
79
Deivon Drago
Deivon Drago@DeivonDrago·
@martinmbauer I am not sure he even understands the open questions that people are working on.
English
4
0
81
1.6K
Josh Watson
Josh Watson@JoshuaLWatson·
tfw you're a being among beings
English
3
1
17
432