Person
35 posts




If Valve’s 30% transaction fee is so outrageous (it’s not), then others can simply provide alternatives and charge less. If players still don’t want those alternatives, it’s for a reason: the higher prices they see are worthwhile for the various services involved. So, the alternatives need to also compete on quality. That isn’t an “unlawful monopoly”, that is a competitive service provided at an acceptable rate for developers and players alike. A competitor can undercut that price, but they have to actually do a good job providing an alternative. It is completely absurd to involve the government to punish Valve.


















people keep calling him a nepo baby but i think geoff is actually insanely lucky. his first big break was covering a game his childhood friend was working on called unreal. as in the first game on the unreal engine. then he managed to get early access to half-life















