Soul Invictus

One of the major pillars of modern thought is the hubristic concept of Urdummheit -- the idea that our ancestors were stupid and that we’re much better than they.

@Ragebaitloll @NorthDaygame Your handle says it all.

@NorthDaygame Wrong. ❌ I’ve had 500+ girls : Best in bed: Latinas & ebony Ukrainians & serbs are the easiest to pull home ur just lacking. Romanians & Ukrainians aren’t loyal, u got played 👎 Hottest: Scandinavians but they’re clearly out of your league. 👱‍♀️

i've banged 53 girls in 2 years. this is my ranking of nationalities: best in bed: 1. France 🇫🇷 2. England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 3. America 🇺🇸 easiest to pull home: 1. Hungary 🇭🇺 2. Australia 🇦🇺 3. Germany 🇩🇪 hardest to pull home: 1. Ukraine 🇺🇦 2. Russia 🇷🇺 3. Serbia 🇷🇸 most feminine: 1. Lebanon 🇱🇧 2. Poland 🇵🇱 3. Ukraine 🇺🇦 most loyal: 1. Romania 🇷🇴 2. Ukraine 🇺🇦 3. Poland 🇵🇱 hottest: 1. my Ukrainian 🇺🇦 gf (posted her last week) 2. Serbian 🇷🇸 3. my Polish 🇵🇱 gf (posted her yesterday) prove me otherwise

@Gnosisinformant Doesn't help that there's plenty of midwit podcasters spreading this idiocy around like wildfire.

Just wanted to quickly highlight how stupid these people are. He says “what type of device is she wearing on her shoulder?” (Implying some lost advanced technology) First, this is not even a woman. It’s Amenhotep, a priest of the 18th dynasty. So we’re off to a horrible start. This guy couldn’t even bother to look up what he was looking at before posting about it. 2nd, this was made in the 14th century BCE. Which would mean that the artists that made this would now be aware of the technology that once existed in the “advanced tech times when the pyramids were power plants”. And if people in the 1300s BCE knew about this technology then why did they refuse to write about it? Basic IQ thought processes that don’t take place with ancient advanced tech proponents. They don’t even have the awareness to notice how dumb they look.

Go argue with Augustine of Hippo. His idiotic brain fart has been baked into every form of mainstream Christianity for more than 1500 years now. Ontological leveling + blood guilt is one of the most destructive ideological packages ever devised by a human mind.

@JoshuaLisec The ideological construct that is "original sin" is a form of ontological leveling. Whereas according to Classical philosophy, sin is differs by each individual. Fate also affects how sin might manifest in individuals. The sooner we jettison Augustine's nonsense, the better.

‘No sin is worse than another. You disobeyed your mom when she told you curfew was 8pm one night in sophomore year. I shot heroin and did porn for 6 years. So we’re basically the same; as Christians now, we both DESERVE a perfect, pure, servant-hearted husband. Jesus saves!’

@wendypink224 @AlyssaLogic @wil_da_beast630 "The mileage on this used car I'm trying to sell is no one's business!!" LMFAO

@AlyssaLogic @wil_da_beast630 I’ve never had a guy ask irl, nor would I ask. It’s no one’s business.

You guys know women can simply...lie about their "body counts," right?

@cloneristic Epic levels of sunk cost fallacy in the replies.

Hate to burst any bubbles, but a woman's body count or slutty past costs her absolutely NOTHING in realistic dating market value. Even if it did, any woman can easily defeat her ho phase forever by simply not talking about it. Checkmate. Foids win. Flawless...victory.

@HammerandVajra @TheLordBoard @darwintojesus Yeah I just cut out the middleman and honor Sol Invictus/Mithras/Zeus-Helios!

@TheLordBoard @darwintojesus It's hilarious as Christianity most likely formed from a Sol Invictus, Mithraic, Zeus-Helios, Paganism merged with Abrahamic Judaism.

Pagans always want to worship the creation, rather than the Creator.

@Panagiotou90St @lotuseaters_com You're probably the last person who comes to my mind on the topic of a host interrupting their guests.

Academic Agent is trying to tone police me again. I find the notion unacceptable; funny even. Regular viewers at @lotuseaters_com, not Neema's core audience, know how much I let others speak and how little I interrupt my colleagues during segments. I know it because I am watching the live chat and I regularly chat with many of our subscribers individually. I think I'll be fine. So, what happens here is the following: Neema has just taken excerpts from a few discussions that got heated, particularly the roundtable debate about Greenland and Firas' Friday segment, and projects a general pattern of interruption and segment-derailment on me. No such pattern exists. This is a figment of his imagination which he knows to be false but he thinks is useful to employ against me right now; the attempt will be inconsequential. He didn't express any dissatisfaction with my conduct during the Greenland discussion though. He took an issue with my conduct on last Friday's discussion. I wonder why. In fact, I don't. No one doubts why. It is because he is obsessed with that one issue and he wants others to become obsessed with it and believe: a) exactly what he says about it, and b) what he says about what is to be done about it. The issue comes down to the simple fact that Neema and I disagree about most things. As far as I'm concerned, this is not my problem.

@Goth_Mitch14 @Gnosisinformant To shitlibs like you, "white supremacy" = any white person who doesn't despise their own culture and heritage. Outside your echo-chamber, very few of us have any interest in joining your self-flagellation cult.

@Gnosisinformant Also, where did i say "it's jusified"? Please show me exactly where I said it... because I explicitly said the oposite. Please do not twist my point. It's common sense & decency to point out troubling signs of white supremacy, which is all I did

This is so fucked up. Dear Privileged Academics, This is why the public doesn’t want to listen to you anymore and will choose to get their education from Joe Rogan podcast guests who spew nonsense out of their asses for money. As long as you have the ‘correct’ political beliefs and some credentials you get a license to shame peoples appearance, dox them, attack their livelihood, and determine that their social media posts are “dog whistles”. Seriously though, is this guy going to go after Jeremy Soule now for his song title “Under an ancient sun”? Why not? Is he not pale and bond enough? This is the shit that makes me lose faith in humanity. And I’m someone who constantly defends the system of academia on a constant basis against pseudo intellectuals.

@Gnosisinformant @Goth_Mitch14 Don't waste your breath Neal. He's clearly arguing in bad faith.

Nobody can control their comments. Especially when you talk about religion and Norse mythology. I get the most insane comments on my content. As far as her following sketchy accounts, that’s going to happen. People have common interests from wildly different backgrounds and political perspectives who are going to end up in the same circles. I don’t really care about that. People should judge her by her own work and not who’s in her comments or who she follows. She’s someone who I’ve followed for A while now and I’ve never seen anything that comes off as neo-Nazi or white supremecist in any of her posts or videos. If he thought she was incorrect or spreading misinformation he could have just dealt with her content but he went after her for being a “Nazi”. This idea that “it’s justified” because you found some account she follows that said some cringe shit about Freya is what is causing people to hate academics. It’s just woke scolding in my opinion.

@LizzieMarbach 2026 American Conservatism = Make Second Wave Feminism Great Again.

I think we are underestimating how sexually degenerate the young men are too. The women aren’t just sleeping with themselves. The young men are whoring around too & those who aren’t are addicted to porn. & very few are leading in purity when dating. We don’t have some epidemic of chaste holy men & whore women. Both sexes are sexually immoral & having a difficult time finding godly partners to pursue. I have seen & personally know countless situations where a virgin woman married a man with sexual history—in fact, this is much more common in my experience. Pretending like we have a generation of chaste holy young men while the women are all whores is just lying to ourselves about the real state of society. The men are in a terrible spot too & in desperate need of Christ.

@TheSaxonOption @LizzieMarbach @MarcusGustavus Pagan Roman and Germanic societies had pretty stable monogamy too. Indo-European cultures everywhere, really.

@LizzieMarbach @MarcusGustavus Not only is this indisputably statistically true, but it’s the natural human condition sans Christian moral restrictions.

@shuttlesberg @ScottMGreer This is especially true when women have access to too large a pool of men. Via the internet, they can pick from the true top 10% and it becomes choice-paralysis or outright rejection as far as the rest of the men are concerned. Maybe we need to return the internet to text-only.

@ScottMGreer It’s all just skirting around the core point that most women are only attracted to 10% of men

People need to spell out these ways besides the apps. We just spent a week of discourse on here on how women don’t want to be approached at church. Approaching at work can cost a man his job. We have fewer third spaces. Younger people go out less and have fewer social connections. More of them live online. It’s not surprising people still rely on the apps given this situation.

@moenarch @ScottMGreer The problem now is that in many cases there simply is no community anymore. And by that I mean tight-knit (meat space) groups of 150 people or less. Our biggest need right now is bringing back organic accountability ecosystems. Without that, everything is low-trust hell.

@ScottMGreer The problem with being approached after mass, or on the street, or in a bar is that the man is not vetted by the community yet. It is increasingly harder to build any kind of rapport first, to set you apart from the guys who are just looking for girls.

@ChristinaPushaw @megbasham @SavvyTamz_57 And today the managerial-bureaucratic juggernaut treats any form of organic community formation as a grave threat that needs to be immediately subverted or snuffed out.

@megbasham @SavvyTamz_57 The problem is, you can’t really go back to the old ways in a modern society because the old ways require a mostly homogeneous, high-trust, rooted, and generally religious society.

The depression among young women, the rage among young men because they can’t find each other is primarily driven by this. The online dating experiment failed. Yes there’s some happy couples out there. But at scale, it has left young men and women, isolated, insecure, and resentful. Time to acknowledge it and get back to better, time-honored ways of meeting each other.

@dr_duchesne This is just a rehash of Marija Gimbutas's feminist historical revisionism, except now in chud form. I hate to break it to you, but Neolithic Europeans were patriarchal and warlike too. It's just the invading Indo-Europeans proved themselves to be much better at those things.

It may be difficult for people today to grasp this, given the widespread emasculation brought about by progressive liberalism: the male ego reached its highest level of differentiation among White men, x.com/jomickane/stat… who transcended the dominance of the Great Mother archetype. For most of human history, in hunting-gathering societies, small scale farming villages, and even the earliest civilizations, men remained subordinate to fertility goddesses and, therefore, to the nurturing yet devouring forces of the collective unconscious. However, starting with the horse-riding, protein-rich dairy diet and dynamic pastoralism of the Indo-Europeans, White men began to create their own sky gods and move away from the fertility goddesses. They transformed their mythical origins into heroic narratives of male achievement, in which the masculine ego confronts and overcomes the "dragon" or Terrible Mother, and establishes patriarchal structures, rationality, and a stable ego. The emergence of male rationality, individuality, and a higher form of consciousness, came out of the Homeric warrior culture of ancient Greece, with its Olympian pantheon. This development served as the essential precondition for the far greater achievements of European men throughout history, as conquerors, builders of the greatest empires, the explorers and discovers of the Earth, and modernizers of the world. If one wishes to understand why Muslim men, African men, Indians, and Semites have historically depended on White civilization, the benevolence of White men, for their sustenance and advancement, the explanation lies in the fact that their male ego has remained relatively submerged in the collective psyche through "participation mystique." This is why the intellectual consciousness of non-White men has remained comparatively weak, prelogical, and instinct-driven, with their libido trapped in the primordial, demonic layers of the unconscious rather than being mobilized for masculine ego separation and heroism. As you can see in this video, the group dominates, treating the individual merely as an organ within a larger body. Matriarchal elements still prevail, emotionality and ecstatic abandon, which hinder full male ego emancipation and the development of the "higher masculinity" required for free will and self-determining reason. Be warned: liberalism, in its final progressive phase, is rapidly deflating and degrading the White male ego under the maternal grip of feminism. This regression, combined with large scale racial intermingling with non-Whites, will ultimately destroy the very foundation of the White male ego.

@RomeInTheEast 1, 2, and 3 were the nicest choices at that time.

Where would you spawn?

Weird take. Most forms of Protestantism actually removed all or most of the pagan content found in Roman Catholicism. Yea it's true that Prot-ism infused more Germanic cultural habits and preferences into Christianity. Modern Germanic Paganism simply takes that all the way.

“They are called sacred Daemons; They live on earth and are good, Warding off evil & guarding mortal men.” - Socrates (Plato’s Cratylus, 398)

@pamvonhadder Haute Brutalism.

how do you call this architecture design style?