Cayman Nava

218 posts

Cayman Nava

Cayman Nava

@caymannan

Ethereum @lodestar_eth

Katılım Ocak 2009
830 Takip Edilen689 Takipçiler
Cayman Nava retweetledi
Potuz
Potuz@potuz_eth·
@peter_szilagyi Life is brighter once you realize that the vast majority of people in #Ethereum do still have their integrity. There's a small minority that unfortunately have both weight and incentive to lie/cheat/misdirect, etc. They'll fail.
English
0
2
36
1.8K
Cayman Nava retweetledi
Rich Baris THE PEOPLE'S PUNDIT
Rich Baris THE PEOPLE'S PUNDIT@Peoples_Pundit·
Sorry to kill the buzz you get over killing people from afar, but it doesn't matter if the war goes well. That's totally irrelevant. War is not an electoral benefit in this country anymore. That's such a boomer delusion, nostalgia for a world that no longer exists.
English
114
181
998
22.3K
Cayman Nava retweetledi
nflaig.eth
nflaig.eth@nicoflaig·
epbs-devnet-0 launch is around the corner, one more client to go
nflaig.eth tweet media
English
5
13
71
9.5K
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
.@github please restore my AI teammate's account: lodekeeper
English
0
0
2
116
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
Greg has an interesting point. That Tomasz leaving is a sign that the EF didn't get reformed (from infinite garden circlejerk to effective org actually facing reality). "Nothing really changed" I have no visibility inside the EF, just a view of the core dev ecosystem. My view is that there has been meaningful reform, possibly the most that's safely possible given the current configuration of participants. The push to "2 forks a year". Alignment of EIPs to top-level priorities. Is that "enough" to both move fast enough and maintain the trust of the community? I dunno. I'm still betting that it is.
GregTheGreek@gregthegreek

I'm not shocked hearing Tomasz is stepping down from the EF. When he first opened up his calendar to everyone, we had a chat about my thoughts and goals. I told him concretely: "You really only have one KPI, and that's getting fired in the first year." ----- Why? Power struggles. "It's now how we do things at the EF" is a phrase you hear way to fucking often. Nothing changes there. Aya never really left. Vitalik had been mostly absent the prior year, focused on whatever drove his passions (happy for him), but he was absent. The EF was in an absolute shit show. Leeches everywhere, dead products clinging to $1m budgets, and god knows what else. The EF needed reform. It needed to be shaken up - enough to wake up V and rein him back in a bit. I'd argue that's exactly what happened. A bunch of internal change that people didn't like, and now we. see him leave after one year. My litmus test hit. Nothing really changed. ---- Flip Side Tomasz has a deep background with Nethermind, Flashbots, VC, etc. - obvious COIs that were disclosed in advance (from what I've been told). But they're a lot. I know plenty of people didn't like how many COIs existed, and that probably contributed to this too. I'm sure he genuinely wants to get back to building - sitting still at a foundation isn't much fun. But I still don't buy it for a minute. He was pushing reform, and most likely got pushed out. I have immense respect for Tomasz. Sad to see him go since there aren't many grown ups with real business experience in the foundation. I just hope we get some real strong leadership in there. The flowery garden shit is exhausting.

English
1
0
9
639
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
@jelena_noble He's being sarcastic imo. The political conflict is not coming from community banks. Its the big banks that are throwing the wrenches in the bill.
English
0
0
2
216
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
9/11: by way of deception thou shalt do war
English
0
0
2
342
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
Sad day for civil political discourse in America
English
1
0
3
383
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
The sad reality is that Ethereum can't carry the burden, because we actually don't care about the libp2p vision (too busy shipping our own vision). Deeply appreciative of the working product, but with an irreconcilable difference in priorities that means we don't care to fund it. Libp2p was originally chosen for the beacon chain because there were so many unknowns, and the flexibility of libp2p was assumed to mitigate the risk of picking the wrong stack. Now, for the beacon chain, libp2p is a liability that must be worked around as much as a benefit. Extra, outside spec standardization process - bleh. Unnecessary abstraction layers - bleh. Why don't we just use QUIC.
English
1
12
25
1.8K
Potuz
Potuz@potuz_eth·
Why is pureETH a headliner? Is it so invasive to implement? Cc @caymannan since you brought it to my attention.
English
2
2
8
602
Cayman Nava
Cayman Nava@caymannan·
@tcoratger @lodestar_eth @JavaScript @ziglang @bunjavascript Yeah, we'll still be using rust, not throwing away code we already have. But there's a bunch of small reasons we're choosing zig moving forward. I suppose it can be summed up as we like zig for its conceptual simplicity (vs rust).
English
0
0
3
81
Péter Szilágyi
Péter Szilágyi@peter_szilagyi·
@nicolas_a4 The question isn't about the users, it's about the builders? Why was a new chain built? There was never a new internet built.
English
6
0
6
900
Péter Szilágyi
Péter Szilágyi@peter_szilagyi·
Started working on my slides for #ETHCluj and figured I'll do a tongue-in-cheek talk about decentralisation: Is #Bitcoin decentralised? If it were, #Ethereum wouldn't exist. Is #Ethereum? If it were, #Solana wouldn't exist. There's no Internet-2, why is their blockchain 2? 😬
English
19
7
98
20.2K
sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
Most crypto work (partially mine included) runs on some sort of 'hope Microsoft keeps GitHub online' mode. Git is decentralised but GitHub isn't. Shutting down key repos is one of the easiest ways to censor or disrupt upgrades and dev coordination. And yes, Microsoft can do that. There are legit alternatives but none with full feature parity. It's already way too late, but we as an industry must really rethink how we write, collaborate, deploy, and ship code.
English
33
25
299
18K