BeeOneBomber

News out today that the ODNI (via Tulsi Gabbard) testified that voting machines from Puerto Rico ("P.R.") have been seized for investigation and are being stored in a secure ODNI location. I looked it up, and P.R. uses Dominion election technology. Now, I mention that b/c one of the interesting things about our snatch & grab of Nicolás Maduro, especially around reports that he's turning state's evidence related to the use of Venezuela's Smartmatic voting technology, is that the company doesn't have a large footprint in the US. Well, that is outside of LA County. *Keep in mind that LA County is the largest county in the US, clocking in at 10 million people, making it more populous than 40 US states, so it's not small potatoes. Additionally, its tech enjoys widespread use globally, meaning the fallout will include election fraud in countries around the world. Now, back to P.R. and their use of Dominion election technology. Dominion is the largest election tech company operating in the US (under the brand name 'Liberty Vote), and is being used by 27 states (and P.R.). This implies that the reach of the investigation casts a much wider net than just the testimony Maduro can provide, specific to Smartmatic's use in the United States. We approached P.R. because the request (which they agreed to) provided for a smooth transfer of the hardware, since there are no sovereign-state power barriers. And for this reason, no lawsuits, injunction requests, temporary restraining orders, or court challenges were filed to block, delay, or contest the handover. The ODNI was undertaking this investigation on the down low, away from prying eyes and the attention it would have otherwise drawn. This is pertinent because the handover occurred in May, 2025, and the public didn't find out about it until Feb 2026. Had the request for the hardware/software been adjudicated in US courts, the investigation would have been known about the better part of a year earlier. Now ask yourself, do you think that was just a case of happenstance that this route was taken, or does that look/sound more like a tactical decision to move forward in what amounts to 'stealth mode' from a legal perspective? I ask b/c if that's the case, the implication is that the investigation is massive and nationwide—hence the strategic decision to employ this end-around to obfuscate the investigation's existence until it could be revealed. If true, we're now close to go time for indictments to drop.