trisha retweetledi
trisha
677 posts

trisha
@cdtricia62
Deep in the closet, back behind the high school yearbook
Katılım Haziran 2026
23 Takip Edilen31 Takipçiler
trisha retweetledi

@CultistCorasahn @JesterJum That has been my go to for years. It works like nothing else that I've ever tried.
English

@JesterJum Old School Noxema, still works to take the sting out and cools your skin down. Nothing else compares.

English
trisha retweetledi
trisha retweetledi

@Super70sSports some of those old Zenith tuners had a tiny amount of high quality gold terminals
English
trisha retweetledi
trisha retweetledi

@OrwellDay If they don't get taken out it will be a disaster on so many levels
English

3 Flock cameras shot in alcohol-fueled evening, Grand Junction police say
-------------------------
A Grand Junction man is accused of shooting multiple Flock security cameras with his grandfather’s rifle, according to law enforcement.
Eric Lazorishak, 30, faces numerous charges related to criminal mischief and prohibited use of a weapon.
Police say Lazorishak shot several Flock surveillance cameras with a .22-caliber rifle late Sunday night.
[Shooting these cameras is a bad idea. If someone were to miss and hit someone it would be a disaster on so many levels.]
cpr.org/2026/07/22/gra…

English

@EmeraldRobinson lol you were doing great, then you said "weather modification".
loosen the tinfoil hat just a bit.
English
trisha retweetledi

@Cynni0204 @EmeraldRobinson The existence of the data centers isn't the most concerning issue. It's the corrupt way they are getting approved, the tax breaks that increase the tax burden on citizens, the damage to water tables, the negative affect on property values and the fear of unknown effects(noise).
English

I agree the surveillance part is concerning, but blaming all of it on Trump is way too broad. Flock cameras are mainly purchased and controlled by cities, counties, HOAs and local law enforcement, not the president. Trump hasn’t banned them federally, and I’d absolutely like to see him push harder for stronger privacy protections, but local officials need to be held accountable too.
As for AI and data centers, Trump has done plenty. His goal is to keep China from controlling the technology that will shape our economy and national security. He launched an America-first AI plan and required participating tech companies to pay for the power and infrastructure their data centers need instead of dumping those costs on American families. The White House also announced those ratepayer protections.
On weather modification, Trump’s EPA brought geoengineering activity into the open, began tracking private actors and started reviewing what authority it has to stop potentially dangerous activity. A complete nationwide ban would likely require Congress, not just Trump signing something with a pen. Check out the EPA site - it explains the actions and legal limits. epa.gov/geoengineering…
I’m all for watching every administration like a hawk, including Trump’s. But saying he has done absolutely nothing isn’t accurate. We should demand safeguards, warrants, strict data-retention limits and real accountability without pretending Trump personally installed every camera or created every technology we don’t trust.
English
trisha retweetledi
trisha retweetledi
trisha retweetledi
trisha retweetledi

Why do they need Flock so badly?
They know things are going to get worse in the US and they're going to need a system to crack down on the protests that are going to spring up.
They can't let our pesky free speech get in the way of their plans.
Flock will be key.
Auron MacIntyre@AuronMacintyre
The UK is covered in a network of CCTV cameras, the average citizen might be filmed upwards of 70 times a day Those cameras weren't used to stop the rape gangs, but they were used to track down citizens who protested the rape gangs Why would Flock cameras be different?
English






















