Charles
17 posts
@B3h3moth5468 @arthur_spirling In days gone by, coal mining was as dangerous as war - so yes, that’s a good comparison. Not sure about oil rigs for probability of death but in isolated incidents sure.
These are obviously not reasons to avoid employing friends together for anything else though.
English
@charlesat7 @arthur_spirling Take a job like mining or Oil rig workers if you have a major catastrophy you still create in microcosm the same dynamic
English
British Army did this in WW1. It was bad.
horse@horsetwting
Best friends should be able to apply to jobs together and get hired as a set
English
@simo4cindy @NoContextHumans The British plug is the best by an order of magnitude.
English
@Homiedino @owowowowowow0 Ever heard of “hurt people hurt people”?
Palestinians are horrifically oppressed. This does not make them virtuous. Typically, it does the opposite - and this applies to almost all nations throughout history.
English
Horrible fucking post. Do you not understand who you are?
State of Palestine@Palestine_UN
“🤣😂”
English
@OzKaterji @ItsArtoir This is a childlike interpretation which Artoir has quite clearly demonstrated to be irrelevant - Ireland was more useful out the war than in it. Quite frankly, the extra obligation to defend their skies would have resulted in Irelands participation being a net negative to the UK
English
@ItsArtoir Look man none of that changes the fact that Ireland refused to fight Hitler. I'm not trying to claim there was no nuance in Ireland's position, but Ireland explicitly chose to remain officially neutral in WW2. That is simply the reality.
English
Ireland’s coast is defended by the Royal Navy and its skies are defended by the RAF, while Dublin spends nothing on defence, lectures the West on neutrality and prides itself for being one of the few free European nations that refused to fight Hitler.
The Irish Politics Newsletter@TullMcAdoo
Read my latest on Ireland's inability to defend itself. irishpoliticsnewsletter.ie/p/ireland-neut…
English
@AaronBastani Rory isn’t right wing - he was about as left as you can get in the Conservative Party, and in the end was kicked out for it. He is, however, extremely pro-status-quo, and Gary is naturally an enormous threat to that. His scepticism is expected and perhaps warranted.
English
The right wing psy-op against Gary Stevenson is incredible.
A ‘YouTuber’ who did maths at the LSE, economics MPhil at Oxford, traded for Citi and wrote a Sunday Times bestseller.
A CV better than 99% of the people this account would lionise.
It’s okay to just say ‘I disagree’.
GB Politics@GBPolitcs
🚨NEW: When asked for his intellectual influences regarding economics, Zack Polankski names two YouTubers and a Novara media commentator
English
@clubcillian @MiddleAmericanJ @BrorDudde @kenmoos We do, we call it filter coffee. It’s usually really cheap compared to the espresso based coffees, and it isn’t that popular so not everywhere does it.
English
@MiddleAmericanJ @BrorDudde @kenmoos yah exactly. it’s good, and europe has amazing espresso obviously, but sometimes i want my trashy drip coffee cause they give me more energy
English
Ok I've been too scared to ask but what the fuck is coffee creamer
fiascá spice@TilllyNeonn
America has a problem and it’s coffee creamers cause what the fuck is this?????
English
@MattPolProf It’s hard to find a definitive figure for this but actual ‘hands on’ control of Africa was probably only around 10% of the landmass by the end of the 19th century (almost entirely coastal), rising to somewhere around 25% by 1950 & tailing off from there. This is what they meant
English
The legitimacy of their entire political ideology rests on assuming people wont look up and map and realize they're wrong about everything.
Syd Steyerhart@SydSteyerhart
The vast majority of Africa was never colonized, and since WW2 the continent has received the equivalent of *five* Marshall Plans (it only required one to rebuild all of Europe), and yet they still can't build a bridge. It's time to be honest about this. The problem is Africans.
English
Charles retweetledi
🏆CAEDREL'S WORLDS 2023 GIVEAWAY🏆
18 Prizes including 6 Team KR Asia Games Jerseys & A New PC 🎉
🌎Worldwide
🔁RT & Comment on this tweet
☑️Follow @Caedrel on Instagram
▶️Subscribe to @Caedrel on Youtube
For more entries, click below:
caedrelworldsgiveaway.com
#Worlds2023
English
@RichsWrath @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc When Hazard had a 'poor game' it wasn't because he was shitting the bed, it's because someone stuck thmselves to him with glue and fouled him every 5 seconds. Park did it to Pirlo, pocketed him completely. If you sacrifice a top level athlete to dog work, it can happen to anyone
English
@RichsWrath @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc Your opinion on who's better is perfectly valid but again, using the production stats by themselves as the tie breaker isn't really fair.
Hazard in possession did FAR more than Salah. He also wasn't inconsistent - he had one terrible year when Chelsea collapsed, that's all.
English
I think at their very very best there’s nothing in it. But when Hazard wasn’t at it, I didn’t fear him as much as I did Salah on an off-day, a player who could burst in behind and kill you at any given moment. But I preferred watching Hazard
Samuel@SamueILFC
The Salah vs Hazard Debate is officially over. Mo Salah will always be better and always has a better legacy. Case closed. 🇪🇬👑
English
@RichsWrath @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc Salah is more consistent and more efficient. He is also far better off the ball.
But Hazard did SO much more on the ball in starting and building attacking play, in a team where he was 100% the priority target to shut down where Salah hasn't had that prior to last season.
English
@charlesat7 @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc I'm not boiling down Hazard to that. I said the production is the tie-breaker for comparing 2 players with amazing eye test.
Just because Salah is the superior player, doesn't diminish Hazard. The reality is though that Hazard was very lazy off the ball and quite inconsistent.
English
@RichsWrath @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc Hazard would run attacks so singlehandedly as head and shoulders the best player in the side. Pick the ball up anywhere on the pitch and create goals.
Salah also has played in a far better team than anything Chelsea had, with Mane (his equal) alongside him as another threat.
English
@RichsWrath @BlackCa57903590 @JamesB_afc Who's 'better' aside, you're doing a disservice to Hazard by boiling down the comparison to stats and efficiency in front of goal.
Salah's efficiency is spectacular- but he hasn't been the heartbeat of Liverpool as Hazard was to Chelsea. Everything of any merit went through him.
English