microplastic farmer

@timotheeology Isn’t this the genetic fallacy?

ICYMI: Pope Francis’s NY homily today cited Martin Luther approvingly

@scarface_tubby Bro

It’s all fun & games til she’s in the war room drinking 19Krimes with me & the wolves eating blue chews & charcuterie, smoking chronic with BlackedRaw suddenly playing on my laptop 😈

@itshusse but the pants?

dont ask what im wearing its either machel or kapital

I want what he’s smoking

@ErickYbarra3 He will be considered a historical embarrassment

@ErickYbarra3 @ClassicalTheis Consequentialist error

@ClassicalTheis Good, now you can see that couples/relationships are being blessed.... i.e., the good, true, and beautiful elements that can (lol) one day forge repentance and snuff out the disorder.

a) I attend the TLM weekly b) I literally said this was going to happen which is why I said the document would create a pastoral mess

@ByzCat False dichotomy, opposite extreme, straw man

@patrice_pringle @timotheeology Not an argument and an empty characterization

In 5 months, Francis will write a letter saying James Martin had the “only possible interpretation” and popesplainers still won’t get it History repeats itself

@Nobody078423180 @timotheeology @xx_butthead_xx There also seems to be no articulated distinction between “couple” and “union”.

A married man is having sex with his secretary on a regular basis and asks for a blessing for the “irregular relationship.” Pope Francis and DDF Smoocho Fernandez say bless the adulterous couple’s sexual relationship—while “reminding” them that the Church does NOT bless adultery

@Nobody078423180 @timotheeology @xx_butthead_xx What does the term “couple” entail?

@ed_washingtonii @cammurdochmusic Amaarae

@charliestockard @cammurdochmusic By who???

What’s your favorite album of 2023?

1000 shaboingboing stare

@sage907 Once again you have no idea what you’re talking about

@charliestockard Don’t tell me what to do fag**t

@cammurdochmusic @ed_washingtonii Such a good pick

@ed_washingtonii Fountain Baby

@jaydyer @Marlon1984Tweet What do they think the word “couple” entails? Dishonest.

@charliestockard @Marlon1984Tweet of course it is. popesplainers are liars

Tim is spot on in his analysis today. He correctly notes that the blessing itself of the “union” (as the document says) is the blessing of sin and based on consequentialist ethics (which RCism condemns). The popesplainers have already accepted the overton window move, as they now accept the blessing but explain it away as “not liturgical!” So what? Like every fake conservative ever, now you’re defending the old liberalism as the new conservativism lol. Keep getting played

@Marlon1984Tweet @jaydyer I think by “union”, “couple” is meant 31. Within the horizon outlined here appears the possibility of blessings for couples in irregular situations and for couples of the same sex…

@jaydyer I don't support this whole move but document says that blessing of the union is not permitted

@PRTrad1 @Israel Fact

@Israel Unless you are going to accept Him as the Messiah, the Son of God, the King of kings and the One for whom everything was created, you shouldn’t mention his Holy name with your disgusting mouth, “Israel”. Christ is Lord.

Who's gonna tell him?

@andyhouser22 @JamesMartinSJ Read the document.. you’re wrong. 31. Within the horizon outlined here appears the possibility of blessings for couples in irregular situations and for couples of the same sex…

@JamesMartinSJ This is shamefully misleading. One can bless the individual, not the union. Be better.

The Vatican's new declaration "Fiducia supplicans" is major step forward in the church's ministry to LGBTQ people and recognizes the deep desire in many Catholic same-sex couples for God's presence in their loving relationships. It is also a marked shift from...

@sage907 We know

GUAHHHHHHH