Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue...

Returned to #blogging with this long overdue post on the #BuffetApproach to #OpenScience on #CogTales cogtales.wordpress.com/2023/04/16/the…

Das globale Erwärmungslimit von 1,5 auf 1,0 Grad abzusenken, fordert eine internationale Expertengruppe. Der Meteorologe und ZDF-Moderator Özden Terli erklärt, warum er an der Initiative mitwirkt. @TerliWetter klimareporter.de/erdsystem/mit-…

I just lost the circus

@georg_henning Kriegen die bei dir dann auch immer Panik weil man ja nur Maske trägt wenn man Rona hat?

The Dr. is short for Dragonslayer

I hate making the same mistakes. SO... Since last semester, after every class, I graded myself and kept notes on what did and did not work well. I am teaching one of these classes again this semester and so far, it has been helpful to refer back.

Interestingly, as we increased the number of trials required for inclusion, test-retest correlations increased somewhat (more trials per kid helps!)- but even the largest correlations were quite small (and likely too small to be practical for studying indiv differences) (4/6)

So, as part of ManyBabies1, a number of labs brought in babies for a second test session. Despite a large infant sample (N=158), we saw no evidence of test-retest reliability in preregistered analyses. Correlations between looking time in session 1 and 2 was small (r=.09) (3/6)

Test-retest reliability is critical for measuring stable individual differences (e.g. in longitudinal research). But we still know very little about the reliability of looking time measures (see psyarxiv.com/u37fy/ by @Krista_BH @chbergma @VictoriaSavalei) (2/6)

This is a great opportunity where brilliant folks get together in a fantastic setting at @lorentzcenter. Join if you can!!!

call for participants: B. Nicenboim, M van Vugt and me organized a Lorentz Centre "Cognitive Modeling of Complex behaviour" hands-on workshop in January 24. Check the call and join us (early career especially welcome): lorentzcenter.nl/cognitive-mode…

@FromPhDtoLife I have two: one was about managing your PhD (including your advisors) - skills you'll need in any role The other was about finding out what we want from a job, where our strengths are, etc. I forgot what it was called but the method involved a lot of nouns on cards

PhD folks: Tell me (us) about a professional development thing (course, workshop, presentation, whatever) that was good and helpful.

@DrEmmaBeckett The way I learned it it would even be highly unethical and go against any standard practice in medical care... So if you get advice via email, do get a second opinion from someone who can talk to you in person.

& I’m a scientist - I’m never going to give you personalized advice. I’m rarely even going to give advice, I’m not an advisor - I share info, you decide what to do with it.

Wednesday I made a cake on tv & talked about some nutrition stuff. Since then I have had a stream of emails requesting personal medical advice. I cannot stress enough that the people you see on TV, even if they are trustworthy & qualified, are not where to find these answers.

If you want advice on how to eat for your medical condition see a dietitian. If you want to know if your symptoms are linked to food, see your GP. Don’t email people you saw on TV. If they are qualified & professional they won’t give you personal advice over email.

Interested in learning more about 👉Biases in research 👉Meta-research 👉Creating reproducible research Come join us for 5⃣ days of interactive workshops and discussions at the Oxford-Berlin Autumn School 🗓️20-24 Nov 🙋 In-person & 💻 Online Apply: #2023-11-20_oxford-berlin-school2023" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">ox.ukrn.org/events/#2023-1…

This study shows how having hyphens in a paper title is linked with lower citation counts across many fields... but it is also about how arbitrary factors can distort the progress of science, as academic search tools had issues with hyphenated titles, dropping their visibility.

OPUS is inviting #researchers to share their insights on rewarding #OpenScience efforts. Join the #survey to make your voice heard and contribute to a fairer #ResearchAssessment and reward system. ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runne…  #ResearchInnovation twitter.com/OpusEu/status/…

CS @tudelft is expanding: we are looking for Asst. or Assoc. Professors in (Trustworthy) AI, Distributed/Data Systems, and everything in between. If you are interested and have questions, drop me an email! tudelft.nl/ewi/over-de-fa…

Fun fact: in France, Netflix already reports their viewership to writers monthly and pays writers based on that viewership, because it’s the law there. They literally already have this system in place.