CheckYourSafeSpace

748 posts

CheckYourSafeSpace banner
CheckYourSafeSpace

CheckYourSafeSpace

@check_yo_bubble

Washington, DC Katılım Aralık 2019
35 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@pamsson I mean the guy has admitted he sucks when it’s cold. It’s cold in October. If he’s giving us a heads up he’s going to suck during the most important part of the season, idk why we even entertain keeping him around.
English
1
0
5
1.1K
Randy Wilkins
Randy Wilkins@pamsson·
That’s not a good sign that Jazz declined to speak to reporters tonight.
English
50
15
511
98K
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
How do we get those 3 New Yorkers who were brought back from the hantavirus cruise dropped off at #Boone’s house? #Yankees
English
0
0
0
36
MikeMc
MikeMc@mikemc1958·
@crichsports @MrBaddog7676 Steinbrenner handcuffs Cashman. He was GM for 4 world championships. Boone| just handcuffs everybody, he and Hal deserve each other.
English
2
0
0
19
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane They obviously care. And they saw what most people saw. Things had gone off the deepend. Which is why 89% of the counties shifted more Republican. That also doesn’t guarantee anything. The Mellon family spent just as much in 2020 and republicans lost.
English
0
0
0
10
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble Going back to this I guess...I never said it was black and white, but the trend is clear - I certainly wouldn't spend 170 million dollars on something I don't really care about. They seem to care. If you can show me evidence otherwise, go ahead.
Salzige Kane tweet media
English
1
0
0
16
Exec Sum
Exec Sum@exec_sum·
Google co-founder Sergey Brin is coming out as Republican, per NYT The reporting follows Brin's ambitious efforts to kill the California wealth tax, elect a Republican to California governor, and move his residency out of California. He finally expressed his sentiment in a comment to NYT: "I fled socialism with my family in 1979 and know the devastating, oppressive society it created in the Soviet Union. I don't want California to end up in the same place."
Exec Sum tweet media
English
608
1.5K
14.5K
3.1M
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane You also don’t need a brick and mortar to start a business in 2026. I started mine with the income from the job I had at the time. It’s industry-dependent for sure. But regardless of the industry, the more regulation, the more money you’ll need to start.
English
0
0
0
9
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble Sometimes. Some have carve outs for small businesses The barrier for entry on starting a business is astronomical regardless of any regulation. You can't open a store to compete with Walmart not because it'd be too expensive to comply but because they already have a monopoly.
English
1
0
0
13
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane Bill Gates had an extremely public anti-trust case vs the US Govenrment and he’s still a Dem. It’s not all black and white. And most people, when they make that much money, really don’t care either way because they’re never going to feel it.
English
2
0
0
17
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble That is why rich people and corporations tend to support the party that doesn't implement regulations and doesn't support anti-trust laws. They want an unregulated market where their existing power can steamroll competition and form monopolies. Go ask them.
English
1
0
0
12
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane As I said, there are financial incentives for both sides. For the Dem argument, you wouldn’t have to spend resources steamrolling competition if you can prevent them from entering the marketplace altogether.
English
0
0
0
5
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble Except Dems are far more likely to support anti-trust laws which would do the opposite of crushing competition.
English
3
0
0
19
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane & none of it will have any measurable impact on our lives. Whether our lives are great or suck will depend on the decisions we make. People who fail make excuses by blaming people who don’t even know they exist, it’s wild.
English
0
0
0
3
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane At the end of the day, there are financial advantages to siding with either party. GOP is good for business but it creates more competition. Dems tend to be worse for business but, in doing so, they crush competition.
English
2
0
0
17
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane Exactly. So what’s the point of them buying a repub., who wants the government to have less power? If you are going to buy a politician, u’d want the government to have as much power as possible. Otherwise buying the politician would be pointless. Dems are the party of big gov.
English
2
0
0
6
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble Jesus christ you are fucking stupid. Billionaires are relevant because they are fucking billionaires. They could buy you, your house, your dog, your mom's house, and every house on your block. They could buy your district. They could buy your local politician. THEY DO.
English
1
0
0
7
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane This is why up until very recently, all of the major Silicon Valley billionaires supported Dems. Zuckerberg, Cook, Elon, Paige/Brin, etc. unfortunately Dems went off the reservation so that sentiment has shifted as commin sense on the left began to dry up.
English
0
0
0
15
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane Billionaires (more accurately, owners of huge corporations) love Dems because Dems favor more regulation. With regulation comes more cost. When costs go up, smaller companies cannot compete, so competition shrinks and only the big firms are left.
English
2
0
0
16
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane And again, billionaires are irrelevant because there’s so few. If ur argument is billionaires are republicans and they all donate to republicans, on top of being wrong, your argument is irrelevant bc Dems raise more money anyway.
English
1
0
0
7
Salzige Kane
Salzige Kane@SalzigeKane·
@check_yo_bubble Because there are more Democrats and Democrat supporters... Billionaires. That is the topic. Focus.
English
3
0
0
19
CheckYourSafeSpace
CheckYourSafeSpace@check_yo_bubble·
@SalzigeKane And if we’re going to talk about trends, id much rather be on the GOP side of the argument. Counties have been trending away from Dems for decades now:
CheckYourSafeSpace tweet media
English
0
0
0
5