Maddie

#JohnnyDeppWon, the US verdict absolutely stands and everyone who has a problem with said win and verdict may seethe and die mad about it ad infinitum. 💋

Inde Navarrette is a domestic violence survivor supporter. Yay!

“Ah, happy honeymoon. 31st of October.” — “I see pretty much the same. I see that the area in here has been - well, is swollen and -- yeah, there's a bit of a shiner there.” 3:48:01 youtube.com/live/OuZDNakM7…

I’m studying data analytics and have the misfortune of needing to collect data from my account, so if you see a blue checkmark for a while next to my name, that is the reason.

@David_Br22 @jrcdaisy @nixcaroline_ @Supernatural979 #AmberHeardIsAnAbuser #AmberHeardIsALiar #AmberHeard_BPD_HPD

Now let’s pretend the Amber Heard UK photo-op circus verdict isn’t literally moot: I call Amber Heard a wife-beater and an abuser based on the fact that she has been arrested for domestic violence against her ex-wife and her own recorded admissions, therapist testimony, eyewitness statements and a plethora of other contemporaneous photographic and videographic evidence of her violence and malice towards Johnny Depp. (This is all evidence that exists and you can access today, not some hypothetical, metaphorical mountain.) You call him one because of a tabloid headline and a civil ruling reached on the balance of probabilities by a single judge who explicitly acknowledged that as a non-party witness, Heard was not subject to the same disclosure obligations as an actual party which means Johnny did not have the ability to challenge her claims in the way that he was later able to in the 2022 Virginia trial. The UK wasn’t a criminal prosecution and JD wasn’t even the defendant. He was suing NGN and Dan Wootton for libel. The Sun only won under a more-likely-than-not standard and the same judgement explicitly states that JD doesn't have any conviction for violence in the United Kingdom, the United States or any other jurisdiction. It’s why in the US, where Heard was actually the defendant, she was subject to party discovery and was required to produce evidence and sit through cross-examination under oath. Again, the UK judgment was a judge saying that the tabloid’s allegation was probably true, that is, true on the balance of probabilities, which is a lower standard than a criminal trial, which would have required proof beyond a reasonable doubt. And much more importantly, when the actual question is whether Heard’s accusations were true or not, the US verdict carries more evidentiary weight because while the UK case was about whether a newspaper could legally defend its headline under the civil standard, with Heard as its witness while not being subject to discovery, the US case put Heard’s statements as well as her evidence on trial. Last but not least, just because the Court of Appeal refused to grant Johnny permission to appeal doesn't magically turn a civil judgement into a criminal conviction. I really can't "me Tarzan, you Jane" this stuff, so l hope you were able to actually read and understand my "dissertation." The audio below involves an attempt to sexually coerce an unwilling man despite him saying no, so trigger warning for anyone who hasn't come across it yet. (2/2)

Hey, remember when Andrew Nicol gave ‘no great weight’ to Amber Heard’s recorded admissions of violence and said her courtroom testimony was more reliable to him because she pinky promised to tell the truth? Lol. First, let's quickly look at Nicol's hypocrisy and the bias behind his "the evidence as a whole" shtick in the first two screenshots you shared with the class. My response is only to the specific claims and screenshots you've posted. This isn't a full analysis of the UK judgment or a comprehensive discussion of every issue involved. Nicol says that the defendants, NGN, were unable to "make good" Incident 6 in Los Angeles in December 2014, Incident 11 in Los Angeles at Thanksgiving 2015, and the Hicksville allegation. That is just legal language for saying they failed to prove those allegations, which means Johnny Depp successfully challenged those claims. But Nicol dismissed those failures as unimportant, which he could technically legally do, but the problem is that he repeatedly allowed the allegations to reinforce one another whenever that helped NGN and Heard. For even the first alleged incident, he literally admitted that the evidence might not have been enough on its own, but said he accepted it after considering "the evidence as a whole." Yet when NGN failed to prove several other allegations, he refused to let those failures count against NGN's case or Heard's reliability. In other words, every allegation was allowed to strengthen the others when it supported Heard, but the allegations that fell apart were not allowed to weaken her credibility. That is a painfully obvious one-sided way of weighing cumulative evidence. Regarding the alleged sexual assault, Nicol lists Johnny’s jealousy, intoxication and damage to the house, then simply jumps to a conclusion in favour of NGN and Heard on a highly specific allegation involving a bottle. A damaged house cannot and does not directly prove that someone committed every separate act alleged during the same incident, especially when it’s something as specific and serious as sexual assault with a named weapon. Heard also placed the alleged sexual assault on the night of March 8, which was impossible because Johnny was already in the hospital receiving treatment for his finger injury by then. The date was directly connected to the entire sequence of events in Australia and the fact that Heard couldn’t even correctly place her most serious allegation within the timeline is obviously damaging to her reliability, even before we consider the contradictory eyewitness testimony, photographs, audio recordings and non-existent medical records. What’s even more pathetic is Nicol’s response. He effectively says, “yes, she gave the wrong night, on which this could not have happened, but I still believe her,” without explaining why the contradiction doesn’t affect her credibility according to him. He had already decided to accept her account, so why would he even try to seem neutral, I guess. The third image is just a picture of a newspaper. I can’t help you with that. As for Johnny not alleging harm by Heard based on a specific physical or mental injury, that doesn’t mean he was claiming she never abused or injured him. It means he wasn’t asking the court to award him damages for any specific diagnosed psychiatric or bodily injury because that isn’t what his lawsuit was about. His lawsuit was for defamation, i.e, Heard’s statements being false and therefore damaging to his reputation and career. The phrase “physical or mental injury” is just the broad heading, but the wording underneath explains that because Johnny’s mental condition was not the basis of his claim, his lawyers objected to Heard’s team wanting him to undergo a psychiatric examination and making his mental health part of the case. Although later they did have Dr. David Spiegel offer his enlightened opinions on Johnny’s mental health despite never examining him, as well all saw. (1/2)

Johnny Depp has rightfully denied ever assaulting Amber Heard and maintained his position that he was abused by her. As far as Heard’s fraudulent sexual assault claim goes, which is just one of the many instances of her attributing her own crimes onto her victim, she described an extraordinarily prolonged and damaging assault and yet contemporaneous evidence doesn’t at all match what she said. A doctor and nurse saw her in person hours later and even though what she described would have undeniably been visible and obvious, they saw no physical injuries and she didn’t seek medical treatment either. Mind you, she claimed that she bled from internal injuries and had sliced-open feet but she can be heard walking and talking without so much as a wince. She is also recorded saying she is sorry and that she didn’t mean to do it, referring to her assaulting Johnny with the glass liquor bottle. Then while Johnny was hospitalized she got on a flight to Los Angeles and started texting about wanting her name added to the insurance policy on his car. x.com/chikadeechirps… She also didn’t have to spell out his name when it was beyond obvious from the context of her op-ed who she was talking about. After all, she’d gotten a fraudulent TRO against him just two years ago and then tried the next two years trying to crawl her way back to him. x.com/chikadeechirps…

Is that why there’s no evidence of him behaving like this and all of the evidence proves Amber Heard is a malicious, narcissistic hoaxer and perpetrator of domestic violence against men and women who lied about donating millions to charity that would have gone to sick and dying children? Stapling terms Amber Heard’s 2022 propaganda threads fed you onto every part of their relationship when these are not even what Amber Heard’s fraudulent claims are and capitalizing words, as in screaming, does not mean you’re correct. Although I know for a fact none of you were using “post-separation abuse” on this hellsite until people started using it to describe what Amber Heard was doing and is still trying to do to Johnny Depp.

*not of the person-

I need to know who is telling these people that the reason why Amber Heard is known as an abuser is because she isn’t a perfect victim. She isn’t any sort of victim, at least not of the she has falsely accused. She is literally an abuser. She is a perpetrator of domestic violence and she has assaulted and abused men and women.

Amber Heard’s stans are now admitting they know she was relentlessly violent towards Johnny Depp but will continue to justify her vile actions by misrepresenting information like the good little abuser bootlicking abuse apologists they are. Amber Heard assaulted him with a glass liquor bottle and put a cigarette out on his face. The injury became infected with MRSA and could have killed him. She berated him, chased him around, forcing him to lock himself away just to escape her. She accused him of being irrationally jealous and paranoid while having affairs with at least 30+ people and bringing them into his home and then gaslighting him about them. She photographed him during vulnerable moments and kept those photographs to use against him later. She withheld medication while he was detoxing so he would be in excruciating pain. She claimed that he gave her black eyes and broke her bones while witnesses, photographs, recordings and her own therapist’s notes documented her hitting him, throwing heavy objects at him and injuring him. Whenever he confronted her about hitting him, she minimized and mocked him and argued that it didn’t matter because she was smaller than he was. She lied that she had donated her divorce settlement to charity meant for sick and dying children. She has been arrested for perpetrating domestic violence against her ex-wife. She would even coerce him for sex when he would make it obvious that he was unwilling. So it’s actually long past the time for you to stop lying about AH’s victim, but lying comes as naturally to her supporters as it does to her, so I don’t expect much. A domestic violence victim expressing that he wants his abuser dead, and not even to his abuser, but a third party who is a friend and/or confidant, is not morally equivalent to physically assaulting someone, preventing him from escaping, disregarding his consent and then mocking him for daring to call himself a victim. Using his privately written words that were never meant for her eyes or ears while dismissing her recorded admissions and witnessed disgusting behaviour as “tame” is the height of shameless hypocrisy and abuse apologia. After going through Johnny’s communications, all they could find were a couple of texts to use against him. You would think, based on the kind of person AH tried to portray him as, that they would have found something much more damning than a rephrasing of Monty Python satire. Since we’re on the topic of text messages, AH and her then-friend Josh Drew joked about threatening Johnny with Josh’s knives. Josh invited AH and Johnny over for dinner, and AH replied that she first needed time to talk to Johnny and threaten his life if he misbehaves. If Johnny’s hyperbolic text is a murder plan, then what is it when AH is talking about using real knives Josh actually possessed and was offering to bring over that night so she could use them in a real conversation?

“Tell us how” and you turn off your replies. There’s no medical evidence to suggest that Johnny Depp, who was having a nervous breakdown after being assaulted and having his finger severed with a glass liquor bottle by Amber Heard, contracted MRSA from paint. Surgery itself is a risk factor for this kind of bacterial infection. And as you are fully aware, he had to have reconstructive surgery because Amber Heard badly injured him and the doctor who treated his injury for several months said, “he had an infection as a result of the injury,” and he clarified that the infection developed a few weeks after the surgery. I know you’ll be itching to tell me Johnny cut off his own finger, and feel free to do so, but then I would tell you that doesn’t even match Amber Heard’s claim, of which there are multiple versions as well, of him smashing a wall-mounted phone against the wall (that wasn’t visible in any photograph, nor were there any pieces of it to be found) repeatedly until it broke into bits since that would have led to injuries on at least his knuckles and not just a high-force crush injury to the tip of his one finger.

Here's a sample showcase of Amber Heard's many contributions to domestic violence that led to her feature in the documentary Silenced (2026) with her friend and alleged human rights lawyer, Jennifer Robinson. Amber Heard: “All the fucking trust is gone in the relationship because you keep splitting.” Johnny Depp: “I'm not gonna be in a physical fucking altercation with you.” Amber Heard: “What about all the other times you split?” Johnny Depp: “You fucking hit me last night.” Amber Heard: “I'm not gonna get into the details of that fight. You and I both know that you split when there is no physical violence invovled. And, if you split, and you go into a different room and you don't actually leave that house, it does nothing but perpetuate the fight.” 🚩 Amber Heard: “I'm sorry that I didn't hit you across the face in a proper slap, but I was hitting you. I was not punching you. You didn't get punched. You got hit! I'm sorry I hit you like this but I did not punch you! I did not fucking deck you! I fucking was hitting you! I don't know what the motion of my actual hand was, but you’re fine. I did not hurt you. I did not punch you. I was hitting you. Johnny Depp: “How are your toes?” (Referring to the door scraping Amber Heard’s toes as he was trying to keep her from breaking into where he had locked himself in.) Amber Heard: “I’m not sitting here bitching about it, am I? You are! That's the difference between me and you. You're a fucking baby! You are such a baby! Grow the fuck up Johnny!” 🚩 Amber Heard: “I did start a physical fight, so you did the right thing, the big thing. You know what, you are admirable! What’s your excuse when there's not a physical fight? What's the excuse there?” 🚩 Amber Heard: “Have I ever been able to knock you off of your feet? Or off your balance? You're going to get up on the stand, Johnny, and say, (mocking voice) "she started it?” Really? I have never been able to overpower you! And that's a difference, the difference the whole world, and that a jury and that a judge will see. That there's a very big difference between me and you!” 🚩 Johnny Depp: “I lost a fucking finger. I had a can of mineral spirits thrown at my nose.” Amber Heard: “You can please tell people that it was a fair fight, and see what the jury and judge think. Tell the world, Johnny, tell them ‘Johnny Depp, I, Johnny Depp, a man/man, I’m a victim too of domestic violence.’ And see how many people believe or side with you.” And for the people who say she says, “man” and not “a man;” that makes it even worse for her because that is further evidence of just how nonchalant and fearless she was that she was goading him like that.

If Conor McGregor can shamelessly call himself innocent even though his victim was hospitalized from him assaulting her then for sure so can Amber Heard even though her victim was hospitalized from her assaulting him.

Amber Heard is impossibly gross and slimy, but narcissist does as narcissists do. She and her cronies are misrepresenting information again after she was exposed in 2022 as being a malicious liar for the entire world to see based on the same falsified evidence she’s trying to peddle again. It’s the same high contrast, oversaturated photos of her Botox injection site and a cropped photo of Johnny Depp sleeping with ice cream spilled on his lap which Heard had lied to her expert witness about and had said it was vomit. This “documentary” is yet another shameless attempt after the previous failed media campaigns to whitewash her and rewrite history. Remember the Who Trolled Amber podcast in 2024 for which Amber Heard spoke to the host “off-record,” featuring her friends as guest speakers and in which the host went around telling people that the podcast was credible even though they wouldn’t be publishing any of their research or the data behind their claims?

Silenced (2026) has inadvertently proven and featured Amber Heard’s lack of credibility Like with this photo that was cropped in their trailer: not only was Amber’s expert witness told the ice cream in Johnny Depp’s lap was vomit, but a bruise kit can be seen in the foreground.

Amber Heard said herself she hadn’t been silenced. So, who are you going to believe? Amber Heard or Amber Heard?

@aegar_mikasa It’s a trailer of some kind.

@chikadeechirps New clip got released for that doc ??