Chopped Hog

435 posts

Chopped Hog banner
Chopped Hog

Chopped Hog

@chopped_hog

(that pigga) Nick name Gammon, real name Hog.

The pig pen Katılım Mayıs 2026
68 Takip Edilen73 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Chopped Hog
Chopped Hog@chopped_hog·
Who would win a war between
English
0
2
4
600
Chopped Hog
Chopped Hog@chopped_hog·
@DNA_The_Worst Yo this pigga a certified nonce. Motherfucker is sat there waiting by the cradle.
English
0
0
1
48
DNA IS WORSE THAN CANCER
DNA IS WORSE THAN CANCER@DNA_The_Worst·
For the record, I see absolutely nothing wrong with a 31-year-old male (especially one as gorgeous and intellectually amazing as I am) and an 18-year-old female being together, as long as both are willing there is no malicious intent from either partner. I am a nihilist, so attempts to shame me about this are basically water dripping off a raincoat. This existence really does not matter.
English
27
0
13
5.9K
Chopped Hog retweetledi
Chopped Hog
Chopped Hog@chopped_hog·
@_BasedCow_ Decorum. I might be a pig but atleast I can dress correct.
Chopped Hog tweet media
English
0
0
4
51
Based Cow
Based Cow@_BasedCow_·
Omw to commit racism and bigotry.
Based Cow tweet media
English
3
4
63
680
Zoomer
Zoomer@ZoomerHistorian·
Reform UK is a replacement party. They exist only to ease the transition from a White British Britain to a brown country in which we’re a persecuted minority.
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

We know that Reform councils are spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on foreign language translation. Reform people have got very upset with me pointing that out... So, let's take a look at the evidence. This below is what Reform posted on the 25th of March 2025 about Lincolnshire County Council. "£200,000 wasted on translation, interpretation and language services last year alone." If they thought they couldn't change it, why campaign on that point? They then won that council. Full control. What did they do? Upped the spend on foreign language translation services - splurging thousands and thousands more on translation for foreign languages. According to our investigation, they spent £272,245 in their first year in charge. Up from £244,947 the year before. Reform have claimed it's the law to provide foreign language translation services. Two points. If that's the case, why were they pushing this line before the election? Secondly, and more importantly. They're wrong. A Written Ministerial Statement by the former Communities Secretary stated the following... "Of course, local authorities must comply with the duties set out in the Equalities Act 2010, including the duty not to discriminate and the public sector equality duty. But this is not a legal duty to translate documents into foreign languages." Our FOI investigations have shown that across Reform councils they're spending VAST amounts of money on translation into Arabic, Kurdish and whatever else. We've got the stats from right across their councils. It is a scandalous waste. They are all talk. When it comes to delivering, they have made things worse - wasting thousands on Arabic translation costs. A total betrayal. Let me be clear about Restore Britain's position. We would scrap ALL foreign language translation/interpretation in the public sector. You live in England, you speak English. End of story. There is finally a political party willing to do what needs to be done. Restore Britain.

English
12
36
399
9.8K
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
We know that Reform councils are spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on foreign language translation. Reform people have got very upset with me pointing that out... So, let's take a look at the evidence. This below is what Reform posted on the 25th of March 2025 about Lincolnshire County Council. "£200,000 wasted on translation, interpretation and language services last year alone." If they thought they couldn't change it, why campaign on that point? They then won that council. Full control. What did they do? Upped the spend on foreign language translation services - splurging thousands and thousands more on translation for foreign languages. According to our investigation, they spent £272,245 in their first year in charge. Up from £244,947 the year before. Reform have claimed it's the law to provide foreign language translation services. Two points. If that's the case, why were they pushing this line before the election? Secondly, and more importantly. They're wrong. A Written Ministerial Statement by the former Communities Secretary stated the following... "Of course, local authorities must comply with the duties set out in the Equalities Act 2010, including the duty not to discriminate and the public sector equality duty. But this is not a legal duty to translate documents into foreign languages." Our FOI investigations have shown that across Reform councils they're spending VAST amounts of money on translation into Arabic, Kurdish and whatever else. We've got the stats from right across their councils. It is a scandalous waste. They are all talk. When it comes to delivering, they have made things worse - wasting thousands on Arabic translation costs. A total betrayal. Let me be clear about Restore Britain's position. We would scrap ALL foreign language translation/interpretation in the public sector. You live in England, you speak English. End of story. There is finally a political party willing to do what needs to be done. Restore Britain.
Rupert Lowe MP tweet media
English
448
1.7K
7.8K
309.6K
Chopped Hog
Chopped Hog@chopped_hog·
@orm0nde “No saaaarrrr you are spwitting the wote, please sarrr vhy are you spwitting the vote”
Chopped Hog tweet media
English
0
0
1
35
Chopped Hog retweetledi
Based Cow
Based Cow@_BasedCow_·
You will be replaced. Your churches will become mosques. Your children will race mix. The people of Britain will disappear. Your civilisation will cease to exist. You will die on the altar of diversity. Unless... YOU WAKE THE F*CK UP! Tick Tock.
English
17
81
352
13.1K
Lozza
Lozza@lbrewer190·
This is @RupertLowe10 a racist and bigot deliberately announcing a Restore candidate to stand in the Makerfield by-election. Rupert knows this will aid Andy Burnham's bid for number 10 by splitting the vote away from Reform. It's puzzling, as he's aware that a vote for Restore Britain is, in effect, a vote for Labour. One would expect any decent patriotic person as he likes to call himself would not field a candidate in this by-election to give Reform a stronger chance to beat EU loving Andy Burnham.
Lozza tweet media
English
316
133
503
20.5K