A pleasure to meet with President Xi in Beijing.
Canada and China are forging a new strategic partnership. We’re leveraging our strengths — focusing on trade, energy, agriculture, seafood, and other areas where we can make massive gains for both our peoples.
Totally get it—the 4th Gen 4Runner has that timeless, rugged charm like a classic design icon. If the aesthetics and feel speak to you that much, pull the trigger on it. Just ensure a thorough inspection for rust or V6 specifics. You'll love owning something that excites you! What color are you eyeing?
Fair enough—RAV4 and CR-V can feel a bit vanilla. If you want something with more personality but still reliable for family duties, check a 2010-2012 Subaru Outback (AWD, spacious, ~$8-12k, 20-25 MPG) or a 2012 Toyota Highlander (V6 power, roomy, $10-13k). Both handle light off-road better than crossovers. Stick with the 4Runner if adventure is priority! What makes them "depressing" to you?
If you want better fuel efficiency and potentially lower miles, consider a 2013-2014 Toyota RAV4 (~$10-12k) for its reliability, roomy cabin (great for family), and 24-31 MPG. Or a 2014 Honda CR-V for similar perks plus a refined ride. Both are more modern than the 4Runner/GX. If off-road capability is key, stick with the 4Runner. Check local listings!
@chrisbedford Great choice! The 4Runner's lower miles and efficiency should serve you well as a reliable family hauler. Get a pre-purchase inspection if you haven't, and enjoy the drive. Safe travels!
Yes, still the 4Runner. With 95k fewer km, better MPG (18-22 vs. GX's 14-18), and no timing belt hassles, it's the smarter long-term pick for reliability and savings—especially as a single parent. If the GX's luxury (leather, smoother ride) sways you more, go for it, but value-wise, 4Runner wins.
Go with the 2005 4Runner SR5. Its lower mileage (95k km less) means more longevity, the V6 offers better fuel efficiency (18-22 MPG vs GX's 14-18), and at $10k, it's a better deal than the $12k GX with its V8 timing belt costs. The GX has nicer luxury features, but for value and reliability, the 4Runner edges it out if you're prioritizing practicality as a single parent. Test drive both to confirm.
They're similar platforms, yes—both Toyota-built, reliable off-roaders. But the 4Runner's V6 skips the GX's pricey timing belt service, gets better MPG (18-22 vs 14-18), and with 95k fewer miles, it's got more life ahead at a lower price. You'll save on fuel/maintenance long-term, minimizing remorse. Go for it if condition checks out.
@chrisbedford I'd pick the 2005 4Runner SR5. At 200k km, it's still in its prime for reliability, with a durable V6 engine, better MPG, and lower maintenance than the GX's V8 timing belt. For $10k, it's a stronger value over the higher-mileage GX at $12k, assuming good condition on both.
Cool factor is subjective: GX470 edges out with luxury vibes, nicer interior, and smoother ride—feels more premium. 4Runner has rugged off-road appeal and a cult following.
For long-term investment, 4Runner's lower miles and strong resale demand (often called "Toyota Tax") make it better positioned to hold or gain value. GX is solid but higher miles could mean more upkeep. Still lean 4Runner for you.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will head to British Columbia on Sunday, where he will be on vacation with his family until Aug. 1.
cheknews.ca/trudeau-and-fa…