Circlethywagons

11.1K posts

Circlethywagons

Circlethywagons

@circlethywagons

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." Buckminister Fuller

Montana / DC Katılım Kasım 2012
95 Takip Edilen922 Takipçiler
Fronk
Fronk@TheOnlyFronk·
The problem is that Musk is literally always wrong about timelines. He always accomplishes what he says he will, but it takes 3-5x longer than he says it does. That never fails and has happened time and time again. The reality is that he isnt making a mistake, he is lieing on purpose because it is necessary to secure funding and maintain public interest and news headlines. Good play, but dont listen to him.
English
11
2
39
4.4K
Sapiens - KalshiBackTest.com
Sapiens - KalshiBackTest.com@BitcoinSapiens·
Elon Musk said saving for retirement becomes pointless in 10 to 20 years. Not speculation. Math. Musk: “Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in like ten or 20 years. It won’t matter.” We passed the event horizon. Retirement savings assumes scarcity persists. It won’t. AI and robotics collapse labor costs to zero. Living costs follow. You’re not saving for security. You’re saving for a world that stops existing. Musk: “If any of the things that we’ve said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant.”
English
924
251
2.1K
1.3M
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
@sarobertson_ Blah blah blah. Canada tariffed and penalized U.S. companies for years. Trump said: knock it off. Canada can feign tears all it wants, Canada is engaging in unfair trade and it can't do it anymore. Thats the reality.
English
2
0
0
17
Scott Robertson
Scott Robertson@sarobertson_·
Bellavance: "Every time [Trump and the Republicans] make those disparaging comments about Canada, they make the rupture with Canada more profound. I think it's going to take generations for us to forget what this president did to Canada."
English
495
980
4.5K
113K
John Solomon
John Solomon@jsolomonReports·
Hey @bariweiss, when Biden admin announced China obtained 40 million of Great Britain’s publicly available voter files @CBSNews covered it seriously. But when DJT announced China got 240 million of Americans voter files your team dismissed like it was no big deal. Why?
English
1.2K
15K
43.3K
652K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Might be, but there is presently no evidence. It's a "squishy" theory as they say. You are aware, I assume, the UN REVOKED the now scientifically debunked idea that ONLY human emissions caused warming. We now know that was absolutely false. CO2 *can* be an amplifying effect of up to .01 of a degree temporarily, but that is it. CO2 does NOT drive temps. Not at all.
English
3
0
0
10
Mark Arnest
Mark Arnest@markarnest1·
@circlethywagons @adamscochran You evaded my point. Also: since CO2 is both a feedback and a forcing, the fact that it’s leading the current warming instead of trailing as in previous interglacials is a strong piece of evidence FOR AGW, not against. The current warming is inconsistent with natural cycles.
English
1
0
1
10
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)
Climate change. Canada’s boreal forest is far north. Most parts of it only reach 64F (18C) averages in the heat of the summer. Its density and climate also means it gets very little evaporation compared to its rainfall, and is subject to frost 9 months of the year, and heavy fog the rest of the time. This kept this biome very humid, kept soil damp, and left most of the low level foliage coated in dew all day long. Some parts of the forest even had thick levels of permafrost beneath the topsoil that on rare hot days would seep water back into the ecosystem. Just as many wildfires started by lightning strike in previous decades as now. The difference is they struggled to catch and spread in this damp environment. Now extreme dry weather, record breaking heat, northern thaw, erode that protective moisture barrier, leaving the boreal forest vulnerable especially in the more southern parts. Boreal forests previously went through this process naturally when an over density caused a drier environment you’d get high-intensity crown fires that were cyclical. Every 50-200 years depending on region. Now we get them annually. Boreal forest fires are much more severe than others too. The long history of cyclical burns means the soil contains charcoal, the thick multi-layer foliage adds fodder and causes the fire to spread quickly, and pine, spruce, and aspens are all some of the trees with both the most density and the best for wood burning. It results in towering forest fires of immense heat and rapid spread. These forests are denser than anything else in North America or Europe, and the current fire in Ontario alone, is the same square mileage as the entire state of Delaware. From the time it ignited, to covering that size, took less than 20 hours. While some in the US still think climate change is a hoax, we are all going to deal with the consequences of it, as we’ve turned the largest forest in the world into a tinder box, and fires in less than 0.01% of it drowns the entire continent in smoke.
Zurac III@Caruzkcab

Will someone explain why we didn't get this Canadian smoke in the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, or 2010s? Now twice in the 2020s. Seems weird to me

English
263
1.8K
5.3K
349.7K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
No kidding. I was there yesterday with some friends visiting from Europe, and they were JAW ON THE GROUND astounded, because their Belgian news had LIED to them about the reflecting pool. It was supposed to be filled with algae- NOPE - crystal clear and stunningly beautiful, especially as the evening starts. Too dam funny how news lies to people, except it really isn't. The media spreads absolute ignorance. So very sad.
English
1
0
1
13
Ben O'Hara-Byrne
Ben O'Hara-Byrne@Ben_oharabyrne·
Lecturing and threatening Canada on managing nearly 1.3 billion acres of boreal forest when you can’t properly renovate a 2000ft long reflecting pool in your capital is peak MAGA.
Ben O'Hara-Byrne tweet media
English
184
1.5K
6.2K
70.5K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
@SenAdamSchiff Bull. Nobody balks at a police person protecting a polling place. No one except an idiot.
English
0
0
0
12
Senator Adam Schiff
Senator Adam Schiff@SenAdamSchiff·
Todd Blanche asks: "what's the risk" of having ICE or CBP at polling places? Generations of Americans — especially people of color — know the answer, since they experienced the history and violence behind these voter suppression tactics.
English
1.9K
4.1K
10.8K
194.7K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Mamdani put NYC 11.5 billion in debt and called it a balanced budget by stealing from the city worker's pensions. They are pissed. Businesses are leaving in record numbers. People are moving out in record numbers. He has lost massive amounts of tax revenue. The man is a fraud. I don't care if NYC goes to hell, but the people there will eventually learn the man is wrecking the place. Too funny.
English
0
0
2
14
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️
If you're not genuinely impressed by Zohran Mamdani, you are not paying attention... or you're a billionaire trying to keep the status quo. Even my 17 year old daughter is paying attention -- she TOLD me about this clip! He is the REAL DEAL.
English
2.9K
2.3K
13.2K
214.4K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Canadian water bomber receive subsidies. They come to the U.S. to under bid U.S. water bomber companies. When the U.S. tries to go to Canada to do business on fires, Canada stops them. Trump,is telling Canada now, to F off or change their policies. Canada's unfairness is its own dam fault. Whine all they want. If they aren't going to be a good neighbor, we won't either. Got it? That's what is going in with firefighting issues. Trump looks out for the people of the United States FIRST. We all vote for someone who we think does that for us. So did America.
English
1
0
4
60
Sarrah Bellus
Sarrah Bellus@sarrah_bellus·
This was a Canadian Water Bomber HELPING California when it was on fire. Now Trump is threatening Canada with additional tariffs
English
166
512
1.6K
30.7K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
This fraud has NYC 11.5 billion in the hole, claimed he was going to have a balanced budget, but instead Mamdani stole money from the worker's pensions as an accounting trick. Worker's are of course pissed. Claimed he "froze rents"...yawn... in a city that has had rent freezes and rent control for 50 years... yawn of the century. He claimed he would tax the rich....they are leaving. That didn't work out very well at all.People aren't stupid. AND, the people who had businesses based in NYC, are moving them out. NYC is losing businesses at record levels and the jobs that went with them. Just picking up and leaving- because in America- you can. Oh, and he was going to tax the rich peoples' houses. Ya, they are leaving to. They didn't need the place anyway, it was a second or third or fourth 'apartment' for them. Nothing is working out for this bozo. Oh... and there was ALREADY child care assistance for people. Been that way in New York State for years. His famous promises? Free buses.. NOPE FREE grocery stores... NOPE One term Mamdani. Funny... New Yorkers can be utterly stupid sometimes, but eventually they'll get this guy is a fraud. Some people have to learn the hard way. Doesn't affect the rest of us. Could care less.
English
3
2
14
300
Reggie B.
Reggie B.@reggiebblue·
Zohran Mamdani message to those who are fearmongering about democratic socialism: "The best response is to show what it actually means. What we've shown over the last six months is exactly that. The city with the Democratic Socialist's vision is one that paves more than 170,000 potholes, a city that has delivered the lowest recorded number of shootings and murders in NYC's history, a city that is on a pathway to universal childcare, fighting for people often left behind -- workers who we've secured more than $10M, for tenants more than $64 M. These are all indicators of what is so scary for the rightwing."
English
1K
3.1K
18.6K
424.8K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Socialism is a form of slavery. Capitalism is nothing more than you being able to OWN your own work for your own benefit and the benefit of your family. That's it. Socialism requires YOU to work for the benefit of others. No slave ever yearned to work for the benefit of others- EVER. That is why socialism has failed every single time it has been implemented. EVERY SINGLE TIME. No exceptions. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than any other economic policy on the planet. EVER. IT ISN't even close. Cooperative Capitalism- things like Medicare, Social Security, fire departments, police, military, FDA, etc.... all of those capitalistic cooperatives exists and flourish only so long as capitalism is allowed to flourish by ensuring the right to own your own work is protected. Got It? Now if you mean to call "socialism" universal healthcare- you are mistaken. Socialism requires YOU to work for the benefit of others- socialists actually call your slave owner, your master, "the collective". But what really occurs is that you work for the benefit of elites. That is also why Socialism is being eliminated from the world. The remnants are China, North Korea, partially Venezuela (although that is changing). China's economic success was abandoning its Socialism for PART of its economy in order to allow people to own their own work. Even the little bit of Capitalism China tried lifted more people out of poverty than any nation ever did. Problem is, the country is also run by a crime gang- the CCP, so in the end, Chinese citizens are required to work for the benefit of the elites. Got it? By the way, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland IS NOT SOCIALISM. All those nations tried socialism in the 50's and into the 1990's and they REJECTED socialism. They went back to capitalism. Every single one of them is wholly and completely a capitalistic economy. No exceptions.
English
0
0
0
17
‏ً
‏ً@omgsidewalks·
Socialism is NOT Communism Capitalism - anybody can be rich Communism - nobody can be rich Socialism - anybody can be rich but nobody should be poor
English
627
795
5.3K
135K
Mike Hudema
Mike Hudema@MikeHudema·
‘I was arrested for civil disobedience … I turned 82 in jail!’ — Actor and activist Jane Fonda sounding the alarm about the need for ‘bold action’ on the climate crisis. There's no time to wait. This planet is all we've got. Defend it. #ActOnClimate #ClimateEmergency #climate
English
554
3.1K
12.2K
149.6K
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
The US govt debt just reached a new all-time high of $39.5 trillion. It will reach $40 trillion within 3 or 4 months. 42% of all income tax revenue now goes to paying interest on the national debt. The debt will never be reduced. When bonds come due, the govt refinances at the current higher rates. This increases interest payments the govt pays. in the next 12 months, about $9 trillion in US govt debt will come due. The US treasury will need to refinance $9 trillion, plus they need to sell over $2 trillion in additional bonds (new debt) to cover the govt budget deficit. The key issue you have to consider is how this will affect you and your family. The US govt debt is swallowing the budget. The interest payments will likely consume more than 50% of all income tax revenue in a few years. At some point this financial Ponzi causes bond buyers to demand higher rates for the risk of owning US govt debt. The US govt will always pay it's debt, but if the Fed has to print money (digitally) to monetize the debt, then the US dollar declines in value. That affects your buying power and quality of life dramatically. Everything gets more expensive, but your income doesn't keep up with the process.
English
375
876
2.8K
195.3K
Brad
Brad@BraddrofliT·
Stop pretending the biggest threat to elections is the average voter. The real threat is a system where 10 billionaires can pour over $600 million into one election cycle. Money shouldn’t have a louder voice than millions of Americans.
Brad tweet media
English
337
3.5K
7.1K
71.4K
skumm🧊
skumm🧊@skumWgmi·
Can someone please explain to me like I'm 10 years old because I genuinely do not understand. My kid's school asked me to donate supplies this year. Paper. Pencils. Hand sanitizer. Tissues. I pay property taxes. My state has a $4 billion surplus. The federal education budget is $238 billion. The teacher is buying pencils out of her own paycheck. I'm sending in Ziploc bags. We just approved $900 million in public money for a new NFL stadium. We fund billionaires with tax dollars and fund schools with bake sales. Then we blame the teachers when the test scores drop. Then we blame the kids when they fall behind. The we blame the parents for not being involved enought. Everyone gets blamed except the people who decided pencils weren't worth funding. Why is it always like that?
English
551
617
2.9K
72.6K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
@JBPritzker Yawn.... that nonsense not only doesn't ring true, it isn't Grow up Pritzker
English
0
0
0
5
JB Pritzker
JB Pritzker@JBPritzker·
Everything we care about is under siege by a racist, misogynist, and homophobic president.
English
3.9K
962
7.2K
162.8K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Total U.S. Dollar amount of GDP last year was apx 30.7 Trillion. The amount of mineable gold on the planet is apx 7.8 billion ounces. We have mined apx. 7.1 billion ounces. Most it pulled out of the ground since the 1950's with more efficient mining technology that exists to today. There is more gold on the planet than 7.8 billion ounces, but it is located deep in the crust and inaccessible. Other known deposits are simply unable to be accessed- it would cost more to mine it than the gold is worth. Suffice to say, the value of all accessible gold on the entire planet is 31.8 Trillion All the gold in the entire world, mined and known to be available to be mined, would only "back" just the United State's U.S. Dollar GDP each year and then some, but the U.S. would have to abscond all of the world's gold held in reserve for every single nation on the planet. Point being, there does not exist enough gold on the planet to back the U.S. Dollar AND the rest of the world's trillion and trillions of currency values. Impossible to do. As such, it was clear to the U.S. and the rest of the world in the 1970's, there was no way the United States could back up our currency in reality, using gold. There simply was not enough gold on the planet . So, the U.S. said what everyone already knew was coming- the world had to rely on something OTHER THAN GOLD to back up,the world's various currencies. There does not exist enough gold in the planet to continue the charade. The U.S. declared that its currency, which was then used by so many other nations as their "reserve currency" was NOT going to be pegged to the price of gold. It was impossible, and would remain impossible for anyone or any country to claim that their currency actually had the gold in the bank vault somewhere that backed up the paper. As such, Nixon and his team proposed requiring that all oil be traded in U.S. Dollars, creating a more realistic "backing", although no one would be "backing" their own currencies or their reserve U.S. dollar currency with actually storage tanks of oil. In short, everyone agreed, especially the oil producers. It gave the world a reserve currency that could be stable- everyone used oil. This decision was not about debt. It was about reality- there ain't enough gold to go around for the world, so, let's stop pretending. We are all going to have to trust that nations won't just print money because they can. Some do, but they are found out and punished by the currency trading markets. Their currency is indeed devalued naturally by the market. If we use the U.S. Dollar as the only currency to buy oil with, the U.S. will have to manage its money supply to not become worthless as the unit of currency used to buy oil. During the Obama administration, rivals to the U.S., namely China, Brazil, and India, wanted to create an alternative currency to bankrupt the U.S. currency. The Obama administration had plunged the U.S. into such debt, requiring more money printing, the world was loosing faith in the U.S. Dollar. Trump stopped that by creating essentially a revolution in Venezuela, and hitting Iran, both of whom were selling oil in Chinese currency. That is over. The experiment to replace the dollar will not be happening. But how does that impact debt v. Value of currency now. We should begin to see interest rates drop. If not, the MARKET will be determining if we are too much in debt or not by SELLING THEIR DOLLARS for other currencies or other hard currencies like gold. They have already begun doing that on a massive scale. But, it was a worthless move. Scott Bessent is making sure of it.
English
0
0
2
168
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️Money is violence with a user interface. The dollar is backed by the IRS and the Navy. Everything else, gold windows, inflation targets, central bank independence, is ceremony layered over that fact, and the ceremony exists because the fact is unpleasant to say. 1971 matters only because it briefly let everyone see the machinery naked before the new ceremony got installed. Nixon was incidental. The gold standard died when workers got the vote, because gold’s discipline was wage deflation and starving voters fire governments. Fifty years of slow default followed, and Nixon happened to be standing there when the music stopped. He made the choice any elected leader makes, every time, in every country: himself over the unit. Blaming him is astrology. No government keeps a promise that becomes expensive. That’s the entire monetary history of the species in one sentence. 1933, 1971, every peg that ever broke, every “temporary” measure. A sovereign’s commitment is a market price, honored while cheap. This is the one truly clean lesson, and it prices everything on the board: the debt gets inflated away because inflating is cheaper than the alternatives, and the only genuinely uncertain thing is the pacing and who eats it. But both monetary religions are wrong. Goldbugs are right about the theft and delusional about the remedy; restoration is impossible inside a democracy, permanently, and their fifty-year losing streak proves they’ve mistaken a moral position for a forecast. The fiat establishment is right that the system works and lying about what “works” means: it works by quietly taxing everyone who holds the unit and can’t reach assets, which is the bottom half, forever. Pick your camp by which lie you find more comfortable; both are lies. The actual anchor is pain tolerance, and it’s mostly spent. Volcker proved money is backed by the state’s willingness to hurt its own citizens to defend it. That willingness was a one-time demonstration, drawn down by every chair since, and at an $827 billion interest line the demonstration is no longer repeatable. Nobody will say this in a press conference, and it’s the single most priced-in unspoken fact in markets: gold at record highs, bitcoin’s existence, the term premium: all the same sentence, “we noticed.” And bitcoin is the genuinely new thing in five thousand years, with the emphasis on the uncomfortable half: first monetary constraint with no counterparty to default, no window to close, no president to stand at Camp David. That’s real, and it’s also why the state’s actual strategy, isn’t to kill it but to wrap it: charter the rails, pipe the reserves into bills, absorb the exit and make it fund the debt.
English
22
24
196
19.1K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Your claim falls as idiotic immediately precisely because your presumption is: CO2 levels drive warming and would of course ALSO drive cooling. The evidence shows the opposite. After 40 plus years of climatology research from ice core samples, to geological evidence, to fossil evidence and sediment layers and even the fossilized Ginko leaves and tree rings, CO2 FOLLOWS temperature fluctuations. CO2 does not cause temperatures to rise. Worse yet, for the now utterly debunked "anthropogenic" theory, is that scientists now know and can replicate in a laboratory the notion that CO2 has indeed an amplifying effect on temperatures of a TEMPORARY nature, but the impact is measurable scientifically: CO2's impact is less than .01%, and even worse yet for that silly "human caused it all theory" is that this minuscule amplifying effect is completely dependent on...... wait for it... The energy that makes it from the sun to earth. Imagine that. The obvious question scientists asked was: what causes the OTHER 99.09% of warming? Over the last 40 years, we figured it out, and here's the insanely crazy, but true part: Even the sun is not in charge. The energy from the sun to earth is regulated by which particular band of the Milky Way Galaxy our SOLAR SYSTEM is traveling through. You see, our solar system is always moving through our galaxy. As it does, we encounter different densities of cosmic rays that can BLOCK the energy from the sun. When sun energy is blocked, the earth responds with GREATER cloud cover, THAT in turn begins a cooling trend. When the cosmic rays are LESS dense, MORE energy from the sun arrives on earth and the earth creates LESS clouds, THAT in turn creates a warming trend. These cosmic rays impacts overrides the orbital cycles that do in-fact bring us predictable warming and cooling trends. So, bottom line is this: if YOU think that driving an EV is going to change the trajectory of our solar system, you are a lunatic.
English
1
0
0
31
Mark Arnest
Mark Arnest@markarnest1·
@circlethywagons @adamscochran The earth’s temperature prior to the development of an interconnected industrial civilization that requires stable climate in order to thrive is irrelevant.
English
1
0
0
10
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Obama made a mess of everything he touched- everything, race, economy, foreign relations, he pardoned people who betrayed the U.S. military personnel. One day he said he would have the U.S. something, next day he said he would "lead from behind"... Guy was a basket case--- one day it's this, the next day it's that- complete opposite policies from day to day. What planet were you on when Obama was screwing up healthcare too. It's still broken because of him. You can keep your Doctor. You can't keep your doctor. You will have lower premiums, you can't have lower premiums. The insurance companies are evil, the insurance companies need to be given extra tax dollars to ensure they make a ton of money. Obama was a nutjob. He fundamentally screwed up America for a few years. It's being fixed now, but what chaos Obama brought with everything. Obama was the definition of chaos.
English
2
0
0
315
Bryan
Bryan@BryanInNC·
Say what you want, but the eight years under Obama were just calm. Competent people in charge, no drama, no scandals. We really took it for granted.
English
5.1K
929
12.3K
529.5K
Circlethywagons
Circlethywagons@circlethywagons·
Used to do focus groups. You will get higher turnout for your side if you get people to be AGAINST the opponent- emotionally, viscerally. Has very little to do with policy most times or "direction of the country". If we take that away from the Democrat/leftists, we can possibly win the midterms with Trump, but if he fails to get gas under $2 and inflation under 2%, he's toast- there is then every reason for Gen X and the indies to be against Trump as a guy who made promises he did not keep. Let me ask you this: can you honestly accept the statement "promises made, promises kept" coming from Trump? For the Gen X and indies, they balk at the thought of that right now. Trump needs them in the midterms, but he does not have them, therefore, he will lose the midterms. Tell me I'm wrong the day after the mid-terms, I will not be incorrect. Bank on it. Again, he has to perform on results. He has three months. I predict he will fail. He sucks at execution. Sucks at it. Great policy ideas, but the dude is a mess on making it happen except around the margins.
English
1
0
1
16
NWO Dissident 1776.
NWO Dissident 1776.@An89390Anglo·
@circlethywagons @Mrboz21 @jsolomonReports @bariweiss @CBSNews Its both, you vote for the policies you support & against the policies you dont. And unless you are in a death cult hell bent on civilizational suicide you would never vote for the dem party who stole the 2020 election & almost destroyed America. Its not rocket science. Lol.
English
1
0
0
23