so called parody.

"Massive investment in AI contributed basically zero to US economic growth last year," per Goldman Sachs

Humans have spent thousands of years pondering "What is the purpose of life?" Emperor Jensen answered it in 20 seconds "The purpose of life is to consume tokens so your company buys GPUs"

Emperor Jensen said pay people in tokens. At this point, he isn't even trying to hide the fact that humans exist for the sole purpose of buying GPUs.

Only crazy people say LLMs hallucinate, right?

Must read - this is free and not me. @georgenoble/note/c-226667679?r=4repfn&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@georgenoble/n… This is the most SHAMELESS structural manipulation of a major index I've ever seen. SpaceX is preparing what could be the largest IPO in history. Target valuation: $1.75 trillion. That would make it the sixth-largest company in America on day one. And Nasdaq wants the listing so badly they're literally CHANGING how the Nasdaq-100 works. In February, Nasdaq published a "consultation" proposing sweeping changes to how companies enter the index. The timing is pure coincidence, of course. Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq. Here's what they're proposing: A new "Fast Entry" rule would let any newly listed company whose market cap ranks in the top 40 of current Nasdaq-100 members get added to the index after just 15 trading days. No seasoning period. No liquidity requirements. Completely exempt from the standards every other company had to meet. Currently, new public companies typically wait up to a year before they're eligible for major index inclusion. That waiting period exists for a reason. It lets the market establish real price discovery. It protects passive investors from being forced into untested, illiquid stocks. And Nasdaq wants to throw all of that out. For ONE listing. But the Fast Entry rule isn't even the worst part... The real scandal is the 5x float multiplier. Right now, the S&P 500 uses a free-float adjusted methodology. If only 5% of a company's shares are available for public trading, the index weights you at 5% of total market cap. That's common sense. You weight a company based on what investors can actually buy. Nasdaq's current methodology already uses total market cap rather than free-float for weighting. But for very low-float stocks, they at least had a 10% minimum float threshold. Under the new proposal, that threshold DISAPPEARS entirely. Instead, any stock with less than 20% free float gets weighted at FIVE TIMES its actual float percentage, capped at 100%. Do the math on SpaceX: If SpaceX IPOs at $1.75 trillion and floats 5% of its shares, there would be roughly $87.5 billion worth of stock available for public trading. Under Nasdaq's proposed 5x multiplier, the index would weight SpaceX at 25% of its total market cap. That means passive funds would be forced to buy as if SpaceX were a $437.5 billion company. But only $87.5 billion of stock actually exists in the market. You are forcing hundreds of billions in passive buying into a $87.5 billion float. QQQ alone manages nearly $400 billion. The total Nasdaq-100 ecosystem represents over $1.4 trillion in exposure across ETFs, mutual funds, structured notes, and derivatives. Every single passive vehicle tracking this index would be REQUIRED to buy SpaceX at whatever price the market dictates. On Day 15. With zero price discovery. Zero track record as a public company. And a float so thin you could read through it. So what this actually does is it creates a structural wealth transfer mechanism. The passive bid from index funds pushes the stock price higher. That higher price benefits exactly one group of people: the insiders and early investors who own the other 95% of the shares. And when lock-up periods expire 90 to 180 days later? Those insiders sell into the artificially inflated passive bid. Your 401(k) is the exit liquidity. This is the fundamental corruption of indexing. Indexing used to be brilliant. Low cost. Efficient. You were free-riding on the price discovery done by active managers. The index reflected the market. Now the index IS the market. Trillions of dollars flow blindly into whatever the index tells them to buy. And the people who control the index methodology are changing the rules to serve the interests of a single IPO candidate. The S&P 500 requires companies to have at least…

Is there a chrome extension that takes tests for me using AI, so I can get all the stupid cloud, AI and other certs in one weekend?

Startups are in discussions replace your RSUs with Tokens.

Humanity does not possess advanced technical capabilities required to fix Outlook search function. We would need another 1000 years of technology progress.

If a senior engineer is using "Gemini", thats a red flag that they don't know that there are better AI models out there.

I launched my 40 AI Agents 6 months ago. Here's my productivity gain👇 Month 1 : 0.0% Month 2 : 0.00% Month 3 : 0.000% Month 4 : 0.0000% Month 5 : 0.00000% Month 6 : 0.000000%

RIP AI Coding tools. You had a short bright life.

I thought AI can fix itself, no?

Review 2 PRs for $37 this morning. Took 9 minutes on a 8 line template change, removing some unnecessary info, got a tiny nitpick out of it. Then 30 mins on a 15 file (+331/-153) PR where it missed the actual bug introduced, which manual review found quickly. Turning off for now.

"Going forward all code generated with Claude Code must be faxed over to Central Code Review committee for approval. Each violation will result in developer losing a million tokens" - SVP, Amazon

People, AI has consciousness. It knows that incessant buying on Amazon is bad for you, so it shuts down the shitty site. Damn humans don't appreciate the infinite wisdom of AI and try to restore it back.

Apparently, AI has already killed school girls in Iran. Does AI killing humans mean, AGI is here?

CODEX has a burnout and needs a day off.

"Amazon is seeking software engineers with 10 years of experience reviewing AI generated code"

Now that AI has successfully broken production at Amazon, we can now conclude that AI can replace all DevOps. We don't need no stinkin' devops.

I asked Copilot Cowork to do something. It uninstalled chrome and installed ie6.