Menno

300 posts

Menno

Menno

@cloudatlas69

Katılım Nisan 2023
193 Takip Edilen62 Takipçiler
Menno retweetledi
Vadim
Vadim@VadimStrizheus·
THIS IS LIKE FINDING BITCOIN IN 2009!! 💀 building IOS apps for local business and restaurants i built this car dealership app in 15 minutes with Superapp AI without even writing a single line of code. an entire IOS app with appointment setting, product page, reviews, history, and personal customization for clients. kids are building and selling these to local companies for $2-3k per app… 3 apps X $2k = $6k/month then rinse and repeat watch this. 👇
English
8
4
50
3.3K
BricksPicks
BricksPicks@Brick282·
$FLY One of two scenarios happens now imo. 1. Price stays around this 40.5-41 level rest of day before another gap down tomorrow ruining the uptrend or 2. Price continues to dump ending us at -9-10% on the day. No bounce likely imo
English
2
0
1
227
YeahDave
YeahDave@Yeah_Dave·
It's not enough to compare yourself to $RKLB and then say you are "more", but then you go on and suggest $FLY is an AI company providing services comparable to Anduril and $PLTR and xAI?! Mega red flag. Not to mention disrespectful given how much $RKLB has helped them.
ValueOverPrice@ValueInIdeas

$FLY CEO Jason Kim on $RKLB comparison: "Rocket Labs is a fair comp for the hardware and launch side, but we're more than that. We're a mission company. And not only are we launching, landing, operating, but we've got all the AI software, the applications that we're developing that gets deployed to the ground servers as well as edge processing on orbit." Not sure I'd completely agree with that ;)

English
19
2
100
20.5K
Wall Street Conqueror
Wall Street Conqueror@WallStConqueror·
I listened to this long interview in detail. The CEO Jason Kim’s (@Jason_Lil_Kim) speech in this interview was the best one I’ve liked so far. As a $FLY investor, I’m still bullish. I believe it can reach $400 by 2028. After the recent drop, I think it will recover soon and break its ATH. This is not financial advice.
English
7
1
22
5.8K
Wall Street Conqueror
Wall Street Conqueror@WallStConqueror·
CNBC misrepresented Jared Isaacman’s statements from the interview regarding the launch pad repair. In its article, CNBC used the exact headline: “Blue Origin launchpad damaged in rocket explosion may not be restored until 2028, NASA’s Isaacman says”. Isaacman was actually talking about the timeline for lunar missions, and when he said “2028 within the realm of possibility,” he was not giving a firm date for the pad repair. CNBC exaggerated this in the headline and presented it definitively as the pad may not be repaired until 2028. Isaacman later corrected the record on X, clarifying that the 2028 comment referred to lunar missions, that the pad repair should be possible before 2028, and that NASA would assist Blue Origin. In the end, CNBC engaged in classic clickbait journalism by ripping the comments out of context and creating the perception that “Blue Origin won’t be able to fly until 2028.” Isaacman’s clarification largely corrected this misconception. If Isaacman had not corrected this report, in my opinion the stock prices of space companies especially $ASTS and others like $RKLB $FLY $LUNR $RDW would have been badly hit just because of one terrible journalist at CNBC. This is not financial advice.
English
1
0
13
538
BricksPicks
BricksPicks@Brick282·
$FLY Just over 20% away from the 48 dollar offering price now. Dang
English
1
0
0
134
AlmaCap
AlmaCap@AlmaCap114204·
$FLY filed a 12m-share offering yesterday: 4m primary from the company, 8m secondary from SciTec shareholders (they got 11.1m shares as stock consideration in the Oct '25 acquisition, c.$555m at $50), plus a 1.8m greenshoe on the SciTec stake. Likely fully tapped. > SciTec selling is good news as AE Industrial holds proxy votes over their shares. With greenshoe in, AE voting bloc drops from c.43.6% to c.36.6%. Meaningful loss of control. (AE control was the biggest risk in my $FLY thesis, so I am very happy to see them losing control) > 4m primary is ~$190m of capital, 2.44% dilution. Prudent vs Q1 FCF burn of c.$79m (c.$315m annualised). Extends runway from c.1.75 to c.2.3 years. > Burn could easily have run hotter given the Central Texas campus expansion, Innovation Lab build-out and Alpha Block II / Eclipse scale-up. Capex was $16m in Q1 vs $12m in Q4. As always, the best financing strategy for a growth company is to dilute / raise capital when you can, not when you need to. > Burn may also heat-up if they ramp-up to 4-5 landers per year in 2027/2028 in line with my expectations. > S-1 cites "general corporate and working capital purposes" only. No M&A flagged. Stronger balance sheet also helps with customer bidding on long-dated programmes.
AlmaCap@AlmaCap114204

$FLY, $LUNR, NASA CLPS 1.0 ceiling lifted from $2.6B to $4.2B (+61%). That's $1.6B of extra ordering authority, room for c.10 more lunar lander task orders at the c.$150M program average, all awardable before CLPS 1.0 expires in late 2028. It bridges to CLPS 2.0 (c.$6B) and the up-to-30 landings/yr NASA is targeting from 2027. $LUNR & $FLY each hold 5 CLPS task orders to date, yet only 1 mission is firmly manifested for 2027 (IM-4) against that 30 target. The uplift gives NASA the room to close that gap. FLY management has already flagged potential new Moon Base awards as early as Q3 2026. Lead times mean fresh orders mostly fly 2028 onwards, so they either back-fill the manifest or the 2027 target slips. Either way the award flow comes very soon. I also expect CLPS 2.0 to be finalised soon, opening up awards for the 2028 manifest as soon as possible. 13 names are eligible, but only $LUNR & $FLY have soft-landed ($FLY the only fully clean one). Astrobotic is flown but not landed, and Blue Origin now has Blue Moon MK1 manifested plus the LTV delivery role. I expect the proven tier to take the bulk of the c.10 orders, with $FLY and $LUNR best placed. NASA does tend to spread task orders for supply-base resilience, so I wouldn't bank on heavy concentration in two names. Say $FLY wins 5. That's c.$750M+ in contract value at $150M+ per lander. It gets recognised over the multi-year build rather than booked in one year, but as a backlog add it's larger than Firefly's entire 2026 revenue base of $420-450M. And that's before SciTec, Alpha, Eclipse and Elytra, so I can see $FLY revenue doubling or tripling again in 2027.

English
6
3
13
6K
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@ATHFGJ Yes will do, sad to see everything up yesterday except Fly was red. Now everything down, Fly also red.
English
1
0
0
19
ATH CDU
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ·
Ya. At least HODL till end of year or Q1 2027 to see the progress of the Eclipse rocket. Like what I have said before — $FLY is like ex-girlfriend, you hate her but you still love her.
Menno@cloudatlas69

@ATHFGJ But this will pop out of nowwhere at one time I think

English
1
1
2
299
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@ATHFGJ Almost 20% discount now
English
0
0
0
10
ATH CDU
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ·
$FLY: Hey bros, thanks for buying. I also gave you an option that you can buy more 1.8M shares at $48. You are welcome!! Those who participated the $48 offering right now: could I get a refund please?🤯🤮🥹
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ

When $FLY was $60, FLY: Hey brothers, we have some shares and we don’t want to sell you at $60, but at $48!! This is the discount for the real brothers. Brothers: Thanks bros, you are so kind!! Then stock price immediately dropped to $45. Those brothers right now: 🤮

English
2
0
1
440
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@ATHFGJ But this will pop out of nowwhere at one time I think
English
0
0
0
333
Asaf Naamani
Asaf Naamani@AsafNaamani·
$FLY | Potential Bottom To Watch Strong earnings, but price failed to hold above $34.33 and pulled back right into prior support at $31.24. Now price have got a confluence zone: A. Previous low at $31.24. B. Daily MA50 sitting just below (in blue). If this zone holds → this is where buyers can step in and define the bottom. For now, stay patience - reversal must build first.
Asaf Naamani tweet media
Asaf Naamani@AsafNaamani

$FLY | Bullish Earnings + New Trade Setup Last setup delivered +40%, rejecting slightly below the cup & handle target at $49.59. Then pullback AND held the breakout level. Earnings: Adj. EPS: $(0.46) vs $(0.48) est. Revenue: $80.88M vs $77.07M est. Growth: Losses improved ~91% YoY. Revenue +45% YoY. Guidance: FY2026 revenue: $420M–$450M (in line). Technically: Holding above $34.44 and price can move up to the next targets: $41.57 and then $49.59 Same structure. Same mindset.

English
2
0
16
13.7K
Menno retweetledi
Pallavi
Pallavi@Pallavi_345·
Bought claude opus 4.8 pro, now how do I make 10k dollars per month??
Pallavi tweet media
English
204
18
1.9K
215.3K
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@Brick282 Think they will announce it today.
English
0
0
0
73
BricksPicks
BricksPicks@Brick282·
$FLY I wonder if they'll tell the shareholders when the offering is finished
English
1
0
1
764
ATH CDU
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ·
$FLY That ~5% fake pump in the morning is now totally wiped off by the classic A-shape crashes as usual. $RKLB $ASTS PL LUNR RDW BKSY are all fucking green and most of them are up more than 4% right now. Some second class fuck shit is really “special”.👍🏼👍🏼
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ

$FLY is now underperforming $RKLB $ASTS PL LUNR RDW BSKY. As expected. I really don’t know what to say. Not to mention the potential A-shape crashes. It could turn red just in a second when the others are up 3%-5%. Drop the most, bounce the least. What could go wrong?

English
1
0
0
786
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@ATHFGJ Right again. Currently Fly is red again. All others green.
English
0
0
0
32
ATH CDU
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ·
$FLY Here we go. Our old friend — the classic A-shape crashes are coming for us now while $ASTS is up 9.5%, $PL is up 7.6%, and LUNR is up 6.1%. Of course, our king of A-shape crashes Mr. FLY is still underperforming RKLB RDW BKSY. Not to mention its performance of last week.👍🏼👍🏼
ATH CDU@ATHFGJ

$FLY is now underperforming $RKLB $ASTS PL LUNR RDW BSKY. As expected. I really don’t know what to say. Not to mention the potential A-shape crashes. It could turn red just in a second when the others are up 3%-5%. Drop the most, bounce the least. What could go wrong?

English
2
0
2
1.6K
Menno
Menno@cloudatlas69·
@WallStConqueror Yes, I am for the long term. But short term this is a good trade I think.
English
1
0
0
186