Claire

@Hoorain154 Fogs never fail you , never stop Loving you never stop protecting you and I always there for you. Unconditional love, I would not marry someone who didn’t like dogs or kids.. they have no heart

My boyfriend wants to marry me on the condition that I no longer keep my dogs, who should I choose?

@PsyGuy007 I would’ve thought it was more about the legs. It wouldn’t be my choice for an outfit, but then I don’t look like her either.!

🚨 🇪🇸 CHOQUANT : Les féministes de gauche en Espagne demandent le licenciement de cette présentatrice météo, pour avoir porté une tenue « inappropriée » en plateau télé. Moi, je vois une femme belle, féminine, avec une veste et un décolleté élégant. Et toi ? Un ❤️ si tu soutiens la présentatrice‼️

@Art0fThinking tranquil

Describe this in ONE word

@Architectolder hate to tell you this but an uneven kitchen timber floor is problematic no matter how nice they look, All the crumbs get stuck in the grooves, hard to clean and timber doesn’t like a lot of water it will stain and warp.

Backsplash is a no, but the floors are a go.

@Sassafrass_84 @FarmGirlCarrie freedom of speech does not equal freedom from consequences

Yes. I actually do. Keep your politics out of the medical field. If you can't be professional while caring for another person's health, you shouldn't be in health. This was a prime example of FAFO and TDS.

@HazelAppleyard it’s called boundaries

I love her

@Matt_Pinner looks a bit like the killing fields to me

Rose pattern bedsheets from Ikea... yes or no?

@HazelAppleyard that’s the best value $500 you’ll ever get. Learn your lesson never speak to him again and make better choices in the future.

“Pay for my entire abortion or I’ll tell your mom” is unhinged

@StandUpForFact @RightScopee doesn’t look like he’s going hungry sitting in a near new car.

🚨 This post got 136k+ Likes in under 24 hours. Younger Americans say they have no future “They tell us to stop eating out and rents $2,000 a month. Oh, save for retirement, and yet you can barely save for next week. Go buy a house, every house is half a million dollars” “I'm not asking for a handout, man. We're asking for a freaking fair shot at life. Our parents did not work harder than we work right now. They were simply just given a better chance. Their wages covered their lives, their bills, their hobbies, their passions. Our wages barely cover our freaking bills for the month, dude. No amount of budgeting can ever fix a system designed to keep us down. We're doing the best that we can. And yet it feels like the outcome has already been decided.” Do you firmly support and respect this young man? A. Huge Yes B. No

@Double_s_121 Hello! hi from Australia we love your movies. TV show shows scenery food but most of all every Korean person I have met has been delightful.

엑스에서 왜 다들 일본인한테만 이야기하나요 한국인 여기있어요 저에게도 말 걸어주세요 말걸어주셔서 아리가또 고자이데스🙏

@Architectolder Yuk. I want her to try and sell a house that had a very similar profile but not this all night. It was a beast. No one wanted to buy it!

Probably not

@Tanyaelisabeth A lot of judgemental absolutism here. Becoming a parent is complex and there are many layers of emotion thoughts and feelings involved. I know motherhood prevented me from being the best version of myself. Love equals sacrifice. That is the very definition of being a mother.

This is what feminism never talks about: The daughters who grow up hearing they were the reason their mothers didn’t chase their dreams. I know I heard it from my own mother. How she never got to chase her dreams of college because she had me. Kids just like me, all over the world, who became symbols of missed degrees, stalled careers, and unfulfilled ambitions. Every time she looked at me she saw all the things she never got to do. Children treated like obstacles instead of gifts. Feminism told women that we were enslaved by motherhood. That our value was somewhere “out there”, in an office, a title, a diploma. Always out there, never in our homes, never with our families. So now there’s a generation of children being raised by women who saw them as the death of their potential. Not as the blessings they are. This is what happens when you convince women that motherhood is a curse. You don’t just ruin womanhood. You poison the home. You raise children who grow up feeling like burdens, and what a cruel burden that is to place on a child.

@WorkElizab 5

🤔🤔

@MOSSADil Hello

Experiencing suppression with this account. If you see this, do me a favor, just drop a comment. Thanks.

@karatademada O U I greetings from Australia

J’aimerais savoir… Est-ce que vous voyez mes publications, peu importe où vous êtes dans le monde ?

@lippyent .

Under 3% of my followers see my posts! Let’s break the algorithm — Reply with a dot.

@Architectolder Why?

This is a pretty good sized bedroom.

@ThrillaRilla369 In a heartbeat

Would you drive 500 miles in the middle of the night if someone found your lost dog?

@AnytownUSofA Do it be kind❤️❤️

We lost our Daisy in 2017 and haven’t had a dog since. My friend’s elderly mother just passed away and she has asked me if I want these ADORABLE BROTHERS~Chip and Dale. Should I do it? Or do we have a little bit more on our plates right now? I’m torn! ❤️🐕

@DrewPavlou I hope your assessment is correct. should never be a civil matter. anyone who has not been in a war is incapable of comprehending the complexities.

I spent three hours reading Ben Roberts-Smith court documents this morning and found something pretty incredible. TLDR: Previous court cases addressing Ben Roberts-Smith war crime allegations relied on the testimony of illiterate Afghan villagers who called him an infidel. Part of the war crimes claims made against Ben Roberts-Smith relied upon the testimony of Afghan villagers who openly told Australian courts that they viewed Roberts-Smith and Australian soldiers as infidels. Nine Media relied upon the testimony of three key Afghan witnesses in order to support the claim that Roberts-Smith executed a farmer named Ali Jan who he claimed was a Taliban spotter. These men were illiterate subsistence villagers who expressed hatred for ''infidels'' including Australian soldiers during the trial. Hanifa, pictured in court drawings wearing a green shawl, acknowledged directly that foreign soldiers were called ''infidels'' or ''kafir'' and that he did not like them. He also confirmed that persons killed by soldiers were called ''martyrs'' and that he hated Australian soldiers for going near ''our women.'' He said: "If they are coming to our houses, go inside to our women, of course that's what we call them infidels." Mangul, pictured in the court drawings wearing a blue shawl, expressed hatred of foreign soldiers and confirmed his view that they were infidels or kafir and that those they killed were martyrs. He said he did not like the Taliban but still referred to Australian soldiers as infidels. According to Daily Mail court reporting, when asked if he hated the soldiers who invaded his country and did not share his Islamic faith, Mangul said: ''Yes, it is like that.'' Hanifa also told the court that when the soldiers arrived by helicopter, he took a donkey from Ali Jan in an attempt to make them both appear to be nomads: ''I took one of the donkey from him thinking that we will look like nomads and the foreign forces will think that we are nomads.'' The actual mechanics of their testimony is incredible in and of itself. Hanifa told the Federal Court that a man named ''Dr Sharif'' paid for his accommodation, food and transport for up to a year in support of his ability to testify against Roberts-Smith. Dr Sharif worked for representatives of Nine newspapers as a fixer in Afghanistan. Each Afghan key witness said that a local representative for Nine Media paid their family's living expenses since moving to Kandahar, then Kabul, earlier in the year. According to Daily Mail court reporting, one key witness was accompanied by his wife and five children, another by his wife and six children and a third had 14 relatives with him. And the logistics regarding court translation were incredible. The only available court-certified Pashto interpreter lived in Ontario, Canada. When hearings commenced at 10:15am in Sydney, it was 8:15pm in Ontario and 4:45am in Kabul. The Afghan witnesses therefore gave evidence about murders in a Taliban stronghold through a three-way international audiovisual link at dawn, interpreted by someone in a different hemisphere. The court-certified Pashto interpreter conceded that he had difficulty translating from classical Pashto to the rural Pashto dialect the men spoke. All three ultimately testified that they did not see the alleged shooting execution of Ali Jan, but two said they directly observed Roberts-Smith kick him off the cliff. Roberts-Smith has always maintained that Ali Jan was a Taliban spotter in a village that was a Taliban stronghold. It is a matter of historical fact that there was confirmed armed Taliban presence in the village of Darwan the day of the raid and that Roberts-Smith killed a confirmed armed Taliban militant during the wider operation. Roberts-Smith was operating in the village of Darwan while searching for Hekmatullah - a Taliban sleeper agent in the Afghan National Army who massacred three Australian soldiers in cold blood as they prepared to sleep on their own base. This massacre of Australian soldiers was technically a Taliban war crime. By enlisting in the Afghan National Army and wearing its uniform, Hekmatullah had presented himself as a co-belligerent fighting alongside Australian forces - not against them. This made him guilty of the war crime of perfidy. Judge Besanko ultimately dismissed the infidel/kafir argument in a single paragraph for each witness, bracketed with the Dr Sharif financial support argument, writing: ''However, I do not consider (the infidel argument), or indeed the other general motive to lie advanced by the applicant of the sustenance (food and transportation) provided by the respondents through Dr Sharif, to be strong motives for Mohammed Hanifa to lie." In my opinion, this represents an instance of the Australian legal system failing to grapple with the cultural gulf between Australian morals and Pashtunwali morals - raised in a deeply conservative Pashtun culture in which foreign soldiers are categorically viewed as enemies of the faith, living day to day in a Taliban stronghold village, I believe the hatred that these men had towards Australian soldiers means that their testimony cannot be fully trusted. Roberts-Smith's barristers directly put it to Mangul that his religion permitted lying to infidels in some circumstances. Mangul rejected the suggestion — but the mere fact that Roberts-Smith's own counsel felt compelled to raise the question in open court speaks to the cultural gulf I am describing. It must be said that their testimony was not the only testimony against Roberts-Smith that day - their words were held up as corroborating the words of an Australian soldier, Person 4. Besanko J and the Full Court both wrote that even setting aside the Afghan witnesses' evidence, Person 4's account stood. That said, it feels deeply wrong to me that the Australian courts did ultimately choose to rely upon the evidence of men who openly admited they viewed Australian soldiers as infidels and subjects of contempt. It feels like a particularly troubling example of misplaced institutional deference - treating the admission of deep religious hostility as insufficient to question the reliability of evidence. These Afghan witnesses may now testify again in the criminal trial against Roberts-Smith where the standard of proof is ''beyond reasonable doubt'' rather than the civil ''balance of probabilities.'' The criminal standard of ''beyond reasonable doubt'' is substantially higher than the civil ''balance of probabilities'' standard at which the defamation findings were made. It is hard to see their evidence alone passing muster at a criminal standard.