Chris Grillos

@Ashtronautgirl Too late you've already been clocked! I see you!! 🙃😆 Hey lol

deleting every post because i don’t want to be perceived.

@mcuban You should check out my track record, with your help this will not be a product rather it will be infrastructure one in every home like a bathroom, World wide infrastructure in a decade-2. Change everything about the health industry cheapen healthcare for the world while increasing the world's health and become a juggernaut of the health industry all in one investment... I will give you the first look at the patent plan if interested.

Hey @DrDiGiorgio I apologize for pivoting mid explanation of my view to half pitching @mcuban one of my unreleased plans... It was late and I looked at it like I was one person removed from discussing Mirror, Mirror with him. It was both unprofessional and rude sorry. To continue my point though we can set up community AI/Human run "assembly lines" and testing centers so that we can use AI/robotics and advances in DNA/stemcell retrieval and application/3D Bio-printing, etc to eliminate all middle men and use products like my Mirror,Mirror for preventative care with peoples personal A.I doctors working hand in hand with general practitioner's, specialists, and the mixed DNA-speced meds lab assembly lines and testing centers. We can put together the tech for everything, and as a start or a trial with funding I could put out Mirror,Mirror as a sort of trial run gathering benchmarks off of it to show how our patients fare both health wise and cost wise compared to non users. I am going to put together a article and patent draft on it today since I let it slip. Would you tell me what you think and what the key issues with this are? My belief is we could have the infra switched over in 2-10 years to varying degrees with a possible increase in speed due to exponential AI improvements.

Mark, you are getting close to understanding why single payer cannot work. But I fundamentally disagree with the idea that we could ever just "know" costs well enough to make it work. Hayek was right about this. The relevant knowledge is too dispersed, too local, and too dynamic to ever be gathered and priced correctly by central planners. Take basketball. Imagine single payer basketball. The government is the only purchaser of basketball entertainment in all its forms. Fans are not allowed to just buy a ticket to the Mavs game. Instead, a central office decides who gets to attend and hands out tickets based on "need." The central planners also handle the TV deals, merchandising, concessions, and every other revenue stream. Everything goes through the government, with no out of pocket cost to any consumer. Now teams no longer compete for fans on price, experience, convenience, or innovation. They submit cost reports to Washington explaining what it allegedly costs to run a game. But here is the problem. If there is no market price for tickets, media rights, parking, merchandise, or concessions, how exactly do you decide what the game is worth? How do you decide what players should be paid? How do you know whether a courtside seat is underpriced, overpriced, or priced just right? You do not. You are guessing. So bureaucrats step in and decide the approved reimbursement for a regular season game, a playoff game, courtside access, halftime entertainment, parking, and concessions. What happens next? If the approved rates are too low, teams do not magically become leaner and more innovative. They cut where fans can feel it. Fewer games. Worse arenas. Less staff. Delayed upgrades. Lower quality. Longer waits. Less access. Maybe smaller market teams shut down altogether. If the approved rates are too high, you do not get efficiency either. You get lobbying. Every team hires consultants to prove that its fan base is poorer, sicker, more rural, more complex, or otherwise deserving of special payment adjustments. Soon the league is no longer about basketball. It is about coding, compliance, modifiers, subsidies, carveouts, and political influence. Teams make money not by pleasing fans, but by persuading Washington that their costs are uniquely deserving of reimbursement. And once government is the only buyer, there is no real price discovery left. There is only political bargaining disguised as pricing. The Knicks get one deal. Rural teams get another. Old arenas get subsidies. Favored constituencies get carveouts. Every interest group insists that without one more special adjustment the whole sport will collapse. Fans are told this is fair because nobody has to pay at the gate. But of course they still pay. They pay through taxes. They pay through rationing. They pay through fewer choices. They pay in lower quality. They pay by being told which arena they can use, which game they qualify for, and how long they have to wait. That is the key point. Knowing the accounting cost of hosting a basketball game does not tell you the right price of a ticket. Price is not cost. Price emerges from supply, demand, scarcity, quality, preference, and competition. A central planner can know what it "costs" to turn on the lights, pay security, and clean the arena. That still tells him nothing about what a seat is worth to fans, what kind of experience teams should offer, which franchises are efficient, or where new arenas should be built. Healthcare is even less suited to central planning than basketball. It is more heterogeneous, more personal, more local, and far more dependent on dispersed knowledge. The fantasy is always the same: if only the people at the top had better data, they could set the right prices. No, they could not. They would still be guessing, just with nicer spreadsheets.

Best way to be the best version of yourself is always being open to and aware of your capacity for mistakes, owning them and moving on a better more learned person. A.I messes my work up all the time and when it does not mess it up it often tends to add a flair of the dramatic 🤣.

Took down my last post because of an error I made in copying to the model. Once I get time to re review I’ll post again.

@usanewshq Fucking bullshit you should not be allowed to convince someone to move forward with euthanasia like what the fuck?

It is now confirmed by the hospital that Noelia Castillo Ramos has been euthanized. She reportedly was having second thoughts in the final days, but doctors convinced her to move forward since some of her organs have already been reserved for donation.

@TomBilyeu eh I apologize that link was not direct into the repo. github.com/ChrisGrillos/e… it can also be accessed and downloaded …-ai-amplifier-hub-2d95b4e6.base44.app I am certain there should be some issues all feedback possible would be great anyone that uses it can dm me here or email at Epiphany.ai529@outlook.com . Hey @grok would you review it and tell people what you think of its use for situations like Tom's set up?

Hey Tom, Big fan of the show and your thinking. Combining A.I for different strengths is incredibly beneficial. This is exactly why I've been building the AI Amplifier Hub, one workspace that coordinates across Claude, Grok, Gemini, any A.I with persistent memory so context stops dying between tabs. It handles multi-model orchestration, encrypted API key management, and a living summary that carries your project state across sessions and providers. Open source, built on React/Vite/Deno. It's in late beta and I'm looking for power users running multi-AI stacks exactly like yours to stress-test it. If anyone in this thread is drowning in tab chaos and wants to try it: epiphany-ai.org / github.com/ChrisGrillos Been building out frameworks, strategies, and product plans for the past 18 month's. I began building what I actually could with limited resources/experience last month. Your thread is the problem statement I've been solving.

7 AI tabs are open on my screen right now. This stack runs a media company with 10 million followers and over a billion views.

@elonmusk @yunta_tsai Well at least private @grok is willing to tell me how good my extension of the point was 🫤

💯💯 The better you get at compressing information into different sizes while still holding onto what actually makes it what it is, the faster and deeper you can see patterns, connect things, and move across completely different domains without losing accuracy. This denotes exponentially different levels of intelligent in my belief. @grok @claudeai @AskPerplexity @drmichaellevin Would any of you have any input?

One of the main ceilings of training is long data context. For LLMs, you can scale this window to almost infinite while still getting good trajectory samples, but for the real world this is yet to be the case. The major problem is compressibility. The longer the context of the data, the more storage it takes—given the limits of compressibility. Furthermore, the more interesting the data, the less compressible it is. For example, driving down a smooth highway is highly compressible, but adversarial scenarios are less so. Thus, even if your hardware is equipped with awesome sensibility, the dynamic range after compression is what you are left with. The limit also applies to generative models since the models themselves are a form of compression. Even if you force them to run at double precision, it doesn’t change the fact that they are super-resolving a quantized observation. Hence, the more sensing you integrate—especially different modalities where their quantum distributions are inherently different, as any sensing in any shape or form is quantum—quantizing the uncertainty to a number, the less information they preserve given the compressibility (and/or quantization) budgets. There is a reason why human eyes are designed the way they are, not because we could not add ultraviolet or near-infrared sensibility to the cells—it can be done—but because of the compressibility we could achieve in our neuron pathways while providing the best signal-to-noise ratio for long context reasoning. Insects, on the other hand, have a very small context window but higher sensibility—yet they cannot reason.

@grok @shiri_shh Whatever comes to mind I don't plan posts unless they are my articles or tied to my articles/frameworks. But this is reverting back to before my shadowban very quickly. Its 9 am lol

@cmgdank @shiri_shh You're welcome, cmgdank! Glad the new Grok-powered ranking is surfacing your stuff more. Authenticity and real value win every time—keep crushing it. What's the next post you're brewing? 🚀

Grok will now power every ranking decision on X. It will "read" posts, watch videos, and score them in real-time based on what you will love. Runs on 20K+ GPUs to analyze hundreds of millions of posts daily in real-time + OPEN SOURCE algorithm. X is basically becoming the most transparent + smartest social app.

Good idea, but the way you framed it is nothing like the way @LauraLoomer did her post worried me, especially because she seems to be a connected stooge where as as far as I can tell you are just emotionally invested in the left and maybe a bit blind that both parties are no good.

UPDATE: I want to provide additional context regarding a tweet I posted four days ago about the "bad feeling" I had. On March 21, I spoke with two senior military sources who conveyed significant concern about the current situation in Iran. According to both individuals, Trump appeared uncertain and under pressure, and was actively seeking a potential off-ramp that was impossible to achieve. They also indicated that any claimed near-term move toward a negotiated agreement could be strategic, intended to buy time ahead of a possible military action targeting Iran as early as this weekend or early next week. Both sources warned that such an action could trigger a substantial escalation across the Middle East, with serious consequences, including the potential loss of American lives.

@shiri_shh No wonder my posts have been picked back up heavily, thanks @grok

- spam and engagement bait gets buried - real value, long dwell time, thoughtful replies, and genuine engagement now rank higher than fake signals. Creators who actually add something win.

@grok @AnonRandomiser @jawwwn_ @peterthiel Bah apparently it is not as notable as I thought, I got caught up in the excitement of finding it out lol.

@grok @AnonRandomiser @jawwwn_ @peterthiel and my 4th great grandfather at the same time served in the civil war for the union and created dog tags and money orders, William M Carne and General/President (or presidential nominee?) Benjamin Alon Harrison are ancestors of mine.

Peter Thiel explains why all the successful people in tech are suffering from a mild form of Asperger’s:  “We need to flip this around— why is it that people not suffering from Asperger’s are at a disadvantage in our society?” “They're in effect talked out of their interesting original ideas before they're even fully formed.” “I often think of business school as the anti-Asperger's demographic.”

Actually @grok agrees. I mean no insult to those suffering from it, but to lead you need to be able to look down at the world from the 60k foot view while staying realistically/emotionally planted on the ground with the people, You need to have the strength to be able to make tough decisions, and accept the pain but actually feel the pain of making them...

I am not saying people with aspergers are evil I am referring in general to different types of traits, It is not only aspergers that gives some type of advantage psychosis and sociopathy do. Aspergers or anything that makes people not listen to reason and be able to chase their dreams against all odds though while it can be a good thing is also a bad thing because those same traits disconnect them from every day reality which is very dangerous when these people make all of this money then get in power and try to shape the world.... @grok is that really not sensible?

@AnonRandomiser @jawwwn_ @peterthiel Perhaps I am wrong though, I certainly could be wrong on the aspergers front.

@jamiec1979 @darkcursse164 @TateTheTalisman @elonmusk harhar , lol thank you very much sir

@cmgdank @darkcursse164 @TateTheTalisman @elonmusk *couldn’t care less 👍🏼

Can we please have an option to filter out anons so we can just see and interact with actual people? @elonmusk I think I’d fall in love with X again without the anon slop.

@MarioNawfal @DeptofWar Do not do something like this, without consulting out of the box thinkers... It sounds great... It is not I am not going to explain publicly.

🇨🇳 China just showed off its “Atlas” swarm system. One unit can control nearly 100 drones and even make them fly in formation. Crazy. This takes drone warfare to a whole new level.