CoinBets🔍

$300M + of VC and investor money has flooded into offshore crypto casinos in the last 18 months all trying to build the next STAKE Dicey​.com - $157M MonkeyTilt​.com - $51M MyPrize​.com - $38M Bluff​.com - $21M BetHog​.com - $16M Winna​.com - $15M backed by Paradigm, Sequoia, Pantera, Polychain + more hundreds of millions flowing into offshore gambling platforms we broke down the deals, the economics, and what it actually means for the space does massive VC money change the player experience for better or worse?

@CryptoGambleCom Nice one, I'm sure I missed plenty of others too. Safe to say a shit ton of investment happening atm and will continue

@coinbetscom Check this one too: linkedin.com/posts/totempow…

$300M + of VC and investor money has flooded into offshore crypto casinos in the last 18 months all trying to build the next STAKE Dicey​.com - $157M MonkeyTilt​.com - $51M MyPrize​.com - $38M Bluff​.com - $21M BetHog​.com - $16M Winna​.com - $15M backed by Paradigm, Sequoia, Pantera, Polychain + more hundreds of millions flowing into offshore gambling platforms we broke down the deals, the economics, and what it actually means for the space does massive VC money change the player experience for better or worse?

@YogiGambles because dozens of casinos launch every month, there’s a constant supply of new targets new operators are desperate to grow fast, don’t know who to trust. we go pretty hard on casinos but for sure they're dealing with some bs daily too. its a cut throat industry

Let me start off by saying I fear no one but GOD. The code pushing has now reached peak insanity. The gambling streamer epidemic needs to end. Check out these screenshots from an insider managing some of the high to mid tier streaming talent in the gambling space. An exposé 🧵

the issue isn’t whether the outcomes are “fair” in practice, it’s whether players can independently verify them without a client seed and nonce tied to a persistent server seed, the casino controls every input into the outcome generation that defeats the core purpose of provably fair - simple fix just dont call the games provably fair this isn’t about “shitting on casinos”, it’s about whether the implementation actually matches the claim being made to players

Check posts of that page. It is done on almost each post with different crypto casinos. Its poor style of influencing to go through the way to shit on others. As far as I know that everything is fair and if you don’t understand the specifics on what was written there and haven’t tried it by yourself, means you are just eating that shit as well (don’t wanna be rude, just trying to explain)

firendly reminder from @qzino_official (mb u didn't know) We do have Weekly/Monthly challenges running rn: ▪️Wager $10,000/week → $100 bonus ▪️Wager $50,000/month → $500 bonus Also, who has $1M+ wager on other platforms have a chance to make a VIP transfer to our Platfrom along with extra cool perks and 50$ on balance to strat. for any questions, details, support my dm is open (tag me in comments for faster communication)

@a0kdev I would say provably fair games are but it depends on if they're implemented properly or not. also the actual casino you're playing on matters a lot too

@coinbetscom are regular ones more safe to play?

another FAKE Provably Fair casino: Qzino​.com no client seed no nonce they rotate the server seed every single bet there's nothing for a player to verify against real provably fair has three inputs: -server seed (casino's input, committed before play) -client seed (your input) -nonce (sequential bet counter on a single seed) Qzino skips the player input and nonce completely their hash commitment proves nothing because the casino picked all the inputs they can choose any game outcome they like this is basically a black box game with a fake fairness interface not sure if it's incompetent or malicious no way to know for sure have you played their originals? how did it go?

@a0kdev from what I can see they don't have provably fair in house games just regular ones, nothing to check here

@coinbetscom can you check hyperbet.cc?

@smokeylisa @luckio or a lot of the volume was fake anyway and there's not much to vacuum

Now that @luckio has ceased operations, there is a marketshare vacuum to be filled... I believe we will see some migrate back to centralised sites, but I'd wager many will be looking for a new onchain home. What casino do you think is the smoothest transition for Luck players?

@krombet_ig seeing a lot of casinos just using sports betting interface and calling it prediction markets.. any good examples of casinos that have done it natively well?

1. crypto casinos already have the wallet, the users, and the risk appetite 2. prediction markets are the obvious next layer and almost nobody is doing it right... bolting on a white-label prediction tab is the same mistake as copying someone else's bonus structure (be careful, players notice when something stolen) the casinos that will win here are the ones who make it feel native > daily predictions as engagement loops > community-driven markets > leaderboards built around accuracy (not just volume) the infrastructure is already there the differentiation is in how you integrate it, not whether you do.

@YogiGambles @hacksawgaming Back of napkin math - let’s assume they charging 10% GGR to provide these games for operators means operators are doing 500m GGR in q1 just from hacksaw titles and they’re not even the biggest provider.

Have any of you ever hit a 1000x or more on @hacksawgaming Where do you think the €57 million is coming from?

@YogiGambles I predict crypto casinos will double down on originals game development over next years

Casino Originals are the only real “stand out” differentiator in this space. There’s a reason why in house Originals account for 30 percent of a casino’s GGR, they’re seamless, instant and faster to get to as compared to slots or third party providers. I always look for high retention, addictive mechanics that’ll pull players in and keep them there before they ever touch a slot. A big nod to @yeet and @Roobet for using their own mascots across games, it’s massive for brand recall and awareness from a marketing perspective. More casinos should start looking into implementing more in house “home baked” visuals. Provably Fair on Originals is a marketing buzzword and a label that casinos like Duel slap on everything, do not look at it as a protocol and start blindly apeing your life savings. There are only so many rounds of Plinko and Mines a gambler will play before they move on. I want to personally see more casinos come up with newer in house mechanics and reiterate with new game modes, keep things fresh. cc @noahdummett from Shuffle promised a new banger every month and I can’t wait to see what they come up with next. My boy CB keeps punting out bangers for the industry and is still super under the radar, let’s change that.

how did stake turn “originals” into a $2 Billion / month machine? these games are built for retention and acquisition - not as profitable as slots we broke down what actually makes a good originals game What’s one original that keeps you coming back?

@XiridVAL yes genuine mistake in first part was supposed to be a 3rd party slot. We discussed the duel slot at 7:45

@coinbetscom you said “same games same providers” showing a unique slot with no game provider since it’s an originals game

@XiridVAL we did in the examples in last part

@coinbetscom Bro you were able to pick as an example the first 100% originals slot

fair points, I agree a strong third party original is definitely better than a poorly built in house one but it raises a broader question: what actually makes something an original? most players assume it means in house or unique to that casino, but we’ve seen that’s not really the case, even with in house developed games eg dice etc feels like the terms been hijacked a bit over time I guess the point I was making on in house is more about responsibility, when a casino owns the game, they own the outcome we’ve seen players complain about “originals” to casinos only to be told it’s a third party game not our problem, even though it’s branded as theirs

Appreciate the time you spent making this video on what's clearly a pretty important category, a few extra insights that might help: - "[Originals] is 20-30% of total GGR" If you have GREAT originals (speed, UX, proper PF, variety), it's closer to ~50%. Heavy emphasis on great. I think Stake and Shuffle have world-class originals. Differentiation does matter, but only if your core games (Dice, Plinko, Keno etc) are at parity with the best. - "[Originals] needs to be built in-house" Heavy disagree. If you're a casino team with the talent and resources to make your originals GREAT, sure, in-house wins. But as your own tweets and the examples in your video show, casinos that can't build great originals take shortcuts. They ship "probably" fair and compromise on speed, UX and variety. And that's the unfortunate truth, most casino teams are not game studios and end up scamming their players by shipping poorly made Originals. Casinos that can't make GREAT originals should use a trusted third-party provider that can.

@Pokerbots1 @BenbaLamb we found some dishonest ones here: x.com/coinbetscom/st…

@coinbetscom @BenbaLamb Thanks for the clarity , never thought much on it until I saw the post which should be the purpose of X And you could think on looking into casinos that have RTP set lower on popular provider games as awareness - most players don’t even check

Another really good video from @coinbetscom talking about how important Originals are for an online casino. I expect the level of originals industry wide to continue to get more and more unique and fun in 2026 and beyond. I am so excited to get out the few remaining parity games @yeet still has to build so that we can build some really, really cool never-seen/unique stuff.

3rd party providers usually take ~10-15% of GGR, not the full margin so on a 95% slot (5% edge): $100 wagered = $5 GGR provider takes 10% = $0.50 casino keeps $4.50 compare that to a 99% RTP in house game: $100 wagered = $1 GGR no provider fee, but still far lower margin slots are still where the money is for the casino especially at 95–96% RTP

@BenbaLamb @coinbetscom I thought originals were simply better value as your cutting out a third party provider of games , possibly giving a better return to player and still having more profit because of that initial cost saving ?

@Dollartree_1 You’re right, genuine mistake when putting the video together was supposed to be a 3rd party slot b roll

@coinbetscom LOL this nigga starts the video saying "They all look the same.. same games.. same providers.." and he's showing Groomers Van Come on g.. if you're going to say everything is identical, use Sweet Bonanza there and not the first provably fair 100% RTP slot

Anon operators behind ANJOUAN are making $20-30m a year 1,300 crypto casinos are licensed there - a tiny island most people have never heard of GAMDOM, RAINBET, BC​.GAME + many more their own government has said the entities issuing these licenses are fictitious / unauthorized bodies no dispute handling. no player protection. and when the ABC investigated, the people behind it started deleting their online presence within hours casinos pay $15–20k a year for a badge that has no real legal basis if this license means nothing… who protects players when casinos don’t pay?