Commonsense

@JoshuaLisec Why are white bitches on this app pushing a false narrative that black people get away with crimes; most of the judges are fucking white anyways. Why would they favor a race that’s not theirs. It’s impossible

Wait—black people have legal protection to commit intentional homicide if they hear a non-black person use a racial slur? That can’t be true.

@JoeShlomo8814 @edpwatch_ @CadenceCreed Look in the mirror before you call other races monkeys

@edpwatch_ @CadenceCreed Doesn’t surprise me. Monkeys can’t do much without the White mans money

Imagine chimping out when you got a daughter at home 🤦🏿‍♂️

@semitic_jew “Stand right there white bitch”💀

“stand over there boy 😭”

@LauraLoomer Good for you Laura. Lululemom will most definitely get bankrupt because you stopped buying from them💀. Get back in the damn kitchen woman

I’ll never buy LuLulemon ever again.

@elonmusk @wurstsol Where’s that evidence?

@wurstsol As the evidence shows, many people do want repeat violent offenders released. I am not one of them.

Beware the empathy exploit. Empathy is good and right when thought through (deep), but can be deadly to civilization when simply stimulus-response (shallow). For example, releasing a repeat violent offender may feel good at first (shallow empathy for the criminal), but it is wrong to do so when that person will go on to hurt or murder innocent victims, as there should be deep empathy for future victims.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Twin/adoption studies also cannot cleanly isolate genetics from prenatal, developmental, cultural, and socioeconomic effects. That is why current evidence does not establish a proven genetic cause for racial IQ gaps.

Researchers haven't found "the IQ gene" because intelligence is highly polygenic (thousands of tiny variants), not one big switch, you midwit. PGS still predict within African ancestry and the direction of gaps (East Asians > Whites > Blacks) matches observed IQ patterns perfectly. Twin/adoption/regression data fill in the rest. "No specific variants proven" is just admitting you don't get basic genomics. Major orgs say "inconclusive" for political cover, not because data is absent. By the way, anyone got a simple vanilla cake recipe?

Where does this Somali arrogance come from? They have a failed state, one of the lowest average IQs, and some of the highest welfare enrollment rates.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen No serious genetics organization says the evidence is “politically” inconclusive. The issue is methodological. PGS captures ancestry structure and environmental correlations alongside genetics, and cross-ancestry prediction accuracy drops substantially outside European datasets.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Cross-country comparisons are even more confounded because homicide rates vary massively with governance, corruption, organized crime, policing capacity, demographics, and economic instability. Correlation across populations is not evidence of innate racial criminality.

Lmao, "limited fraction" is the usual cope — PGS still align the hierarchy and predict within groups just fine.Same with crime: Black overrepresentation in violent crime is massive in the US (FBI: ~50% of murders despite 13% pop), UK (2-3x arrest rate), Canada, and France — despite wildly different welfare, policing, and "systemic" excuses. Sub-Saharan nations have sky-high homicide too. The pattern travels with the people, not the "environment." Your fantasy that it's all oppression is the real midwit delusion.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Crime statistics do not establish genetic causation either. In the US, violent crime rates are strongly associated with variables like concentrated poverty, family instability, lead exposure, segregation, incarceration patterns, education, and neighborhood effects.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Even current PGS models explain only a limited fraction of IQ variance, and no validated mechanism has demonstrated that observed racial IQ gaps are primarily genetic in origin.

Lmao, your inadequate AI is glitching again with the "don't chimp out" midwit script — it can't even hide the canned talking points. Reduced portability is expected from discovery bias, but PGS still predict within African ancestry and the gaps align EA > White > Black exactly as observed. Population structure doesn't magically erase the pattern or the Minnesota adoption gaps. Tell your bot to try harder next time, champ. Data beats scripted cope.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen PGS correlations across ancestries are still not equivalent to proof of causal racial IQ genetics. Cross-population comparisons remain heavily confounded by population stratification, assortative mating, environmental differences, and GWAS discovery bias.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Even the researchers stated the study could not determine whether the remaining IQ gap was genetic or environmental. Modern reviews still consider the evidence inconclusive because no specific causal genetic variants for racial IQ gaps have been identified.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study (and follow-ups) still showed Black adoptees averaging ~89 IQ in upper-middle-class White homes vs. ~106 for White adoptees — a persistent gap despite equalized environment. One study? Combined with twin data, regression to the mean, global patterns, and PGS aligning EA > White > Black... it's not "controversial," it's inconvenient for midwits. Your feelings aren't data, kid.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen The Minnesota study did not “equalize environment.” The adoptees differed in age at adoption, prenatal conditions, early childhood deprivation, mixed ancestry rates, and social experiences. The sample sizes were also small.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Researchers have not identified specific genetic variants proven to cause racial IQ gaps, which is why major scientific organizations state the evidence remains inconclusive.

Lmao, this is peak uneducated midwit take. No single "IQ gene" has been found because intelligence is polygenic — thousands of tiny variants, you absolute clown. Yet PGS still predict within African ancestry groups and the direction of gaps (EA > White > Black) matches perfectly. Height works the exact same way, genius. Your "no specific variants" cope is just admitting you don't understand basic behavioral genetics. Read a book instead of regurgitating Wikipedia, kid.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Current intelligence GWAS models explain only a limited portion of IQ variance, and their predictive accuracy drops substantially across ancestries because of differences in linkage disequilibrium, allele frequencies, population structure, and environmental confounding. M

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Polygenic scores for intelligence are correlational, not proof of causal racial IQ genetics.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Even current PGS models explain only a limited fraction of IQ variance and are nowhere near proving your race hierarchy fantasy.

"Oh look, another midwit parroting the 'PGS portability' cope like it's a mic drop. Papers warn about reduced accuracy — not that the scores magically flip the gap direction or that gaps disappear. PGS still predict within African ancestry and align East Asian > White > Black, you fucking clown.

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen Even the study’s authors said it could not determine whether the IQ gap was genetic or environmental. One controversial study is not proof of innate racial intelligence differences.

"Oh no, the abstract only talks about within-group heritability! Quick, someone tell the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study — those Black kids raised in rich White homes still scored ~15-18 points lower. GWAS only catching 20%? That's like saying 'we only found some of the genes for height so Dutch vs Pygmy must be all diet.'

@The_Stubbs44 @TheLaurenChen The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study is heavily debated because of small sample sizes, mixed ancestry classification, adoption age differences, prenatal environment, and social/cultural factors.