Cookie

370 posts

Cookie

Cookie

@cookie86111

Melbourne, Victoria Katılım Eylül 2023
202 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@tommorris32 @7AFL @1116sen No of course not, why should the public have any idea as to how the ARC is meant to work? And they wonder why the officials cop criticism all the time when they don’t explain themselves. Absolute clown show
English
0
0
1
216
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@Ben_Cotton15 @DavidZita1 It just has to be grandfathered in. Clubs have already traded current and future picks in anticipation of F/S and academy picks for this year & changing the rules mid stream is blantantly unfair. It might be unfair not to change the rules but it’s more unfair not to phase them in
English
0
0
0
47
Ben Cotton
Ben Cotton@Ben_Cotton15·
A few extra tidbits re: the AFL’s draft changes… -Fundamental change wanted is needing to use only two picks to match bids on top draftees -View is there’s never a good time to bring in changes re: grandfathering rules. -Main thinking: plenty of father-sons in years past that were late picks (Ablett, Hawkins, Shaw, Cloke etc), but as they became game changes, AFL felt a need to step in and evolve the system -Saints happier - not necessarily happy and wanted stricter changes -View is Blues already had their lick of the ice cream (Camporeale twins, Dean) -Minor changes to 2027 DVI with Tassie coming in. Will extend from 54 to 57 -No changes to FA compo, AFLPA didn’t want it as makes player movement harder -No tanking concerns given high pressures of losing. View is that if a club ever could’ve tanked, North had a chance v Gold Coast in R24, 2023 to get Harley Reid -Considered more radical changes like restricting top clubs from FA -Been to Commision level @FOXFOOTY
David Zita@DavidZita1

The AFL has officially unveiled changes to the draft / player movement. @FOXFOOTY @FOXSportsNews

English
23
3
19
20.8K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@RalphyHeraldSun Cmon Jon, you’re not that ignorant, the issue is why should Carlton have to give up those picks when you consider what Brisbane have got Ashcroft or Collingwood for Daicos. There’s no integrity in the comp if different teams substantially benefit like that
English
0
0
0
187
Callum Twomey
Callum Twomey@CalTwomey·
Greg Swann confirms full steam ahead for the new rules in 2026. But the lobbying from Port & Blues is likely to see the 10 per cent discount - which was set to be scrapped - still apply for teams that miss the finals when matching bids. AFL Daily here 👉afl.com.au/video/1507945/…
Footy on Nine@FootyonNine

"The expectation now, firmly, is that the AFL will plough on and introduce these for 2026." Late pleas from Port, Carlton, and Essendon to delay rule changes haven't stopped the AFL's draft plans, per @CalTwomey. #9FootyClassified | Watch on 9 & 9Now 🖥️

English
35
11
62
109.5K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@RalphyHeraldSun Never want to hear the AFL journos talk about integrity again. These decisions damage the integrity of the game and none of you do your job and question it. Brisbane already have 2 flags cause of these rules - they can keep their flags and the players and nobody else can benefit
English
1
0
4
866
Jon Ralph
Jon Ralph@RalphyHeraldSun·
The AFL will bring in new changes to the father son and academy system incoming days despite intense lobbying from clubs including Carlton and Port Adelaide
English
65
7
183
53.6K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@cleary_mitch @7AFL @7NewsMelbourne Never controlled the ball before it crossed the goal line. The fact the @AFL expect us to believe that and journalists won’t question it is one of the biggest issues atm. If the AFL doesn’t even know the rules how can we trust them? They got it wrong. Period.
English
0
0
1
404
Mitch Cleary
Mitch Cleary@cleary_mitch·
The AFL has backflipped. The ARC will now no longer be able to stop play once a ball returns into motion - like the Rowan Marshall call yesterday. They say that Marshall did mark it but the ARC too long to intervene. But say that Griffin Logue DID touch the ball @7NewsMelbourne
English
71
17
346
54.8K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@tommorris32 I would have thought working for Sports Bet diminishes his authority as an umpire, no? It is right an umpire cannot talk to a player after they’ve reported him but they must also report properly - telling the player why they’re reported and the video shows Foot didn’t do that…
English
0
0
0
181
Tom Morris
Tom Morris@tommorris32·
The AFL Umpires Association has thrown its support behind Nick Foot, who re-shared the post on his Instagram story with the tag line: ‘Happy community umpiring week.’ Fresh allegation: “Nick Foot was subject to multiple pointed criticisms of his character when he did not engage with Zak Butters at the conclusion of the game.” 👇 @1116sen @AFLNation
Tom Morris tweet mediaTom Morris tweet mediaTom Morris tweet mediaTom Morris tweet media
English
135
11
130
78.9K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@7AFL @cleary_mitch @PAFC @AFL The tribunal says all at the same time: 1. Butters said what Foot said he heard - categorical; 2. The crowd booed so loudly to encourage Butters to speak; and 3. Butters spoke much quieter so Wines couldn’t hear - just Foot, regardless of the crowd. Nonsense
English
0
0
0
90
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@7AFL @cleary_mitch @PAFC @AFL Also, Butters record is irrelevant - if we take into account Butters extensive record as noted in the reasons, then likewise we must take into account none of them include umpire abuse. Actually an embarrassing piece of legal prose that should never see the light of day again
English
1
0
1
91
7AFL
7AFL@7AFL·
"Zak Butters said he only said one sentence to the umpire and Ollie Wines said it was more than one. They weren't on the same page and that's what the Tribunal jumped all over." Mitch Cleary on the Zak Butters Tribunal verdict 👉 7plus.app.link/watch-footy
English
23
2
69
49K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@HorusWasRight_ @DavidZita1 @FOXFOOTY There are many ways to challenge evidence… offering your own is a way to do that. Also, Foot was cross examined by Butters representative and it appears his evidence was challenged. To categorically say his evidence was unchallenged is down right wrong
English
0
0
4
105
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@FOXFOOTY Genuine demonstration that the tribunal is not an independent deliberative body but just an arm of the AFL… no way the evidence presented meets the threshold to find Butters guilty (the onus is on the AFL to demostate it happened and not on Butters to show it didn’t happen)
English
2
1
14
482
Fox Footy
Fox Footy@FOXFOOTY·
GUILTY The AFL Tribunal backs the umpire over Zak Butters in his alleged sledge case. WHAT THEY SAID >> bit.ly/4mvpaFE
Fox Footy tweet media
English
76
1
23
15K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
@AFL Clear free kick for legged… trust the AFL to highlight their own incompetence
English
1
0
7
263
AFL
AFL@AFL·
Kozzy's getting it done at both ends 😤 The huge chase down tackle on Kako and he gets the reward! #AFLDonsDees
English
7
1
32
8.9K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
Ben McKay - seriously? I’ve actually turned the game off. I respect myself too much to put myself through this crap #AFLDonsDees
English
0
0
0
185
Himbo in STEM 💖
Himbo in STEM 💖@AndyConboi·
Love seeing the headboard move in time
English
4
45
433
14.6K
Cookie
Cookie@cookie86111·
Both teams playing rubbish but the umps still undefeated as the worst team out there. Blackiston is allowed to hold his ground to mark you imbecile #AFLDonsNorth
English
0
0
4
320