SCoozy

181 posts

SCoozy

SCoozy

@coozy_s

Katılım Şubat 2022
10 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@OurOwnNation Not the same dude, stop posting misleading stuff
SCoozy tweet media
English
1
0
21
1.5K
Our Own Nation
Our Own Nation@OurOwnNation·
Two Hispanic Mosque Shooters in San Diego killed an Islamist Hitler supporter
Our Own Nation tweet media
English
128
217
3.4K
133K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@syncronus Wasnt a gay porn model, he was just a model bro what😭
English
1
0
0
45
SynCronus
SynCronus@syncronus·
Sneako half-black half-Filipino former gay porn model now the Islamist influencer is using the San Diego mosque shooting to shame America's intolerance towards muslims and now his ex is telling how he asked her to eat his asss and peg him with 'his own mold'. Just tells how sick in the head these streamers are. Take your buttfk Islam elsewhere. GTFO of USA.
English
1
1
2
2.7K
Earthling.1980s
Earthling.1980s@Earthling1980s·
@sneako False flag by Iran. It's so obvious you dumb piece of shit.
English
2
0
1
187
SNEAKO
SNEAKO@sneako·
A terrorist attack on Muslims can literally be ongoing and the media will have already found a way to headline why the real victims are jews.
SNEAKO tweet media
English
211
889
6.5K
71.3K
Rueben Boerseun Stop Farm Murders
@WillRobinsonX Muslim and Black fatigue still very high due to thier own actions , can you blame anyone as they openly admit to wanting to takeover America and destroyed it form within .. come to america to become a America leave your shit hole country ideas ideology behind we dont want it here
English
4
1
2
1.4K
Will Robinson
Will Robinson@WillRobinsonX·
What Officers Behind The Yellow Tape Just Told Me About The San Diego Islam Center Shooters 🇺🇸🚨
English
179
904
5.5K
101.3K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
Who dis muslims kill😭😭 If i remember correctly its the europeans that has the most blood on their hands. Lets just take the last 400 years Anglo-Powhatan Wars Pequot War King Philip’s War Beaver Wars Franco-Dutch War Nine Years’ War War of the Spanish Succession Great Northern War War of Jenkins’ Ear War of the Austrian Succession Seven Years’ War Anglo-Cherokee War Pontiac’s War American Revolutionary War Anglo-Mysore Wars French Revolutionary Wars Napoleonic Wars Haitian Expedition Barbary Wars Anglo-Maratha Wars Peninsular War War of 1812 Seminole Wars Greek War intervention campaigns First Opium War First Anglo-Afghan War Mexican–American War Second Anglo-Sikh War Crimean War Second Opium War Indian Rebellion suppression (1857) Second Italian War of Independence French conquest of Cochinchina New Zealand Wars French intervention in Mexico Austro-Prussian War Franco-Prussian War Red River Expedition Aceh War Great Sioux War Anglo-Zulu War War of the Pacific interventions First Boer War Mahdist War Sino-French War Third Anglo-Burmese War Italo-Ethiopian War (First) Spanish–American War Philippine–American War Boxer Rebellion intervention Second Boer War Herero and Namaqua War Italo-Turkish War Balkan Wars interventions World War I Allied intervention in Russian Civil War Irish War of Independence suppression Rif War Second Italo-Ethiopian War Spanish Civil War interventions World War II First Indochina War Indonesian National Revolution intervention Malayan Emergency Korean War Mau Mau Uprising suppression First Vietnam War / Indochina continuation Suez Crisis Algerian War Bay of Pigs Invasion Congo Crisis intervention Vietnam War Dominican Republic intervention Six-Day War Western-backed intervention dynamics Prague Spring invasion Cambodian Campaign Laotian Civil War intervention Bangladesh Liberation War involvement Yom Kippur War superpower intervention Angolan Civil War intervention Lebanese intervention campaigns Soviet–Afghan War Grenada invasion Libya bombing (1986) Panama invasion Gulf War Yugoslav Wars NATO interventions Kosovo War Afghanistan War (2001–2021) Iraq War (2003) Libya intervention (2011) Syria intervention campaigns Anti-ISIS operations in Iraq and Syria Yemen intervention support operations Sahel interventions (Mali, Niger region) Ukraine proxy/intervention involvement after 2014
English
0
0
1
46
Kenny
Kenny@Kennyvoof·
@WillRobinsonX Fuck Muslims… they killed millions upon millions… this is all fake… it was all planned to install Islam in the U.S….
English
13
1
44
2.2K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
its also so retarded to go and try to murder people based on political means or hate. You dont achieve anything from shooting and murdering people other than the other part wanting revenge. Same thing with the bloods and crips in the 90s, its a never ending cycle of violence. But i mean humans will be humans
English
0
0
0
16
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
It wasn’t the guard that deterred them, it was the fact he clicked on the lock down button, that made their objective unachievable. They went to the mosque to slaughter children. But when the guard locked down the entire mosque/school they couldn’t get in. Not only that the guy that picked up the gun from the deceased guard further confirmed they couldn’t achieve their objective because they had to go through him first then the other men that came out to help. So they pussies out and killed themselves.
English
1
0
1
53
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@K24Chips nigga is the biggest loser on earth, cant even shoot himself properly🤣 May he get the punishment he deserves in the hereafter
English
0
0
43
3K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@ak_ar3hi What countries buddy😭 most were pagain😂😂😂
English
0
0
0
22
AK Arshi
AK Arshi@ak_ar3hi·
Accountability! We must all learn something from this. I invite all muslim leaders to call out, apologize, and make up for 1400 years of colonialism and islamic imperialism that destroyed or colonized 2/3 of old Christian countries. Also all Christians must call out the pope for his silence on the islamic regime’s atrocities like killing tens of thousands of protesters & executions going on right now, and the massacre of Nigerian Christians. Let’s see some bold action.
English
56
131
466
8.4K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
You are misreading the text. In Genesis 18 the visitors are called men, and in Genesis 19 they are identified as angels, so they are not God as three persons. And saying Abraham spoke to God face to face does not mean God became human. Exodus 33:20 says no one can see God and live, so these are mediated encounters, not literal. The spirit of God in the Old Testament is just Gods power or presence, not a separate person. There is no clear verse teaching a Trinity, you are combining ideas and calling it proof. Infact there is not one mention of a trinity in the whole of the bible😭 crazy you can believe made up shit. I hope you come to the truth buddy.
English
5
0
0
9
Adrian
Adrian@AtaleofA·
@coozy_s @SimonSaysJ15 @SapienceOrg No I have the prove and evidence it’s in genesis it literally says he spoke to God in person on earth or do you just ignore that part ? And it says he was in human form. Holy Spirit in OT is called the spirit of God Then you have the son being mentioned in OT
English
1
0
0
21
Sapience Institute
Sapience Institute@SapienceOrg·
Christians think that proving this entails Christianity.
English
56
32
286
7.2K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
Them being non believers does not make them eyewitnesses. They still wrote decades later, so it is second hand information, not direct evidence. That point does not change. And your own argument contradicts itself. You say Abraham did not know the Trinity, then claim he met Jesus. That is just you inserting your belief into the text. It never says that. You are assuming your conclusion and reading it back in instead of proving it. And honestly you are just disproving your own position at this point. Your argument does not even stay consistent. I hope you actually step back and look at it properly and find the truth
English
0
0
0
7
Simon Says
Simon Says@SimonSaysJ15·
@coozy_s @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg Tacitus and Josephus are non believers dummy. You mentioned Abraham did not know about the trinity and perhaps at the time they didn’t know the relationship of the 3 person Godhead but they certainly met Jesus.
English
1
0
1
25
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
You are just asserting things without proof. Genesis saying Abraham spoke to God does not equal Trinity. It never says one God in three persons. Mentioning spirit or presence is not the same as the Holy Spirit as a distinct person, that is a later doctrine you are reading back into the text. And saying it proves Islam false is not an argument. Explain how one event logically disproves Islam without assuming your own beliefs. If you cannot show that step, your claim does not hold.
English
1
0
0
8
Adrian
Adrian@AtaleofA·
@coozy_s @SimonSaysJ15 @SapienceOrg Abraham spoke to God in person face to face in genesis & God was in human form. Abraham also knew of the Holy Spirit. It’s not a later interpretation, for Jesus followers in the first century believed that and Moses also. No it does prove Islam false
English
1
0
1
29
NoImprimaturRequired
NoImprimaturRequired@NoImprimaturReq·
@AzatAlsalim Most of them would be Christian. Interestingly, you leave that off. This post is sadly trash.
English
5
1
19
1.4K
Azat
Azat@AzatAlsalim·
Without Arab Imperialism the Middle East would look a lot different.
English
102
1.5K
4.5K
74.9K
Harman Singh Kapoor
Harman Singh Kapoor@kingkapoor72·
Sikhs are born to die defending their country against aggression, tyranny and radicalism
English
154
878
5K
77K
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
You’re stacking claims without proof. Genesis never says one God in three persons, and Abraham had no concept of a Trinity. The passage describes visitors or messengers, not three persons of God. That’s a later interpretation you’re forcing into the text. And even if a crucifixion happened, it doesn’t prove Islam false. Islam has a different explanation, so your conclusion doesn’t follow. Show one clear verse in Genesis that teaches the Trinity and explain how the crucifixion alone disproves Islam. Also show one verse in the quran that disproves its divinity. Dumb christian
English
1
0
0
22
Adrian
Adrian@AtaleofA·
@coozy_s @SimonSaysJ15 @SapienceOrg Abraham believed in 1 God with 3 persons he believed can come down from heaven & take human form. Read Genesis. There is value on Jesus being crucified becuz it proves Islam false. Proves the Bible true and the Quran false and mohmamd a false prophet
English
1
0
0
23
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@SimonSaysJ15 @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg Nice, straight to insults and dodging the argument. If it was such a “waste of time”,you wouldn’t need to deflect. You couldn’t answer the point about noneyewitness sources, so now you’re backing out.
English
0
0
0
14
Simon Says
Simon Says@SimonSaysJ15·
@coozy_s @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg When you said “the gospels aren’t eye witnesses” made me realize I’m dealing with a 12 y/o. This is a waste of time. Go lick the blackstone.
English
1
0
1
29
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@SimonSaysJ15 @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg Opening with an insult just shows your argument is weak. Calling it a “historical fact” doesn’t make it one. Tacitus and Flavius Josephus are late sources, not eyewitnesses, so they show belief, not proof. And your Genesis point is theology, not evidence.
English
1
0
0
21
Simon Says
Simon Says@SimonSaysJ15·
@coozy_s @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg You must be inbred as it’s a habit within Muslims. Let’s try again, Jesus was crucified, that’s a historical fact. Read Tacitus or Josephus (or the gospels). Yes, Jesus (YHWH) appears in genesis 18 interacting with Abraham and he calls him Lord.
English
1
0
0
24
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@SimonSaysJ15 @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg You’re stacking claims. There are early sources on Muhammad, like Ibn Ishaq and hadith collections. The 1924 Cairo Qur’an didn’t change the text at all, it just standardized one accepted reading. And, no global record = didn’t happen, isn’t how history works.
English
0
0
0
10
Simon Says
Simon Says@SimonSaysJ15·
@coozy_s @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg There arent contemporary sources for Mohamed, uthman, or abu bakhar. The version of the Quran you’re reading is the 1924 Cairo. And this is the worst, there isn’t a single miracle ever performed by Mohamed. The moon splitting would’ve been recorded in other parts of the world.
English
1
0
1
44
SCoozy
SCoozy@coozy_s·
@SimonSaysJ15 @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg You’re wrong. The Gospels aren’t eyewitness or truly contemporary, they’re later texts from a believing community, so not independent proof. And bringing up Uthman ibn Affan is just a deflection, standardizing a text isn’t corruption, you’re switching topics.
English
1
0
0
13
Simon Says
Simon Says@SimonSaysJ15·
@coozy_s @AtaleofA @SapienceOrg I said no contemporary source outside of Christianity. The gospels are contemporary sources, you just don’t accept them. You have a worse problem bc you can’t establish that the quran was passed down accurately, hence, uthman order ibn thabit to burn all the different versions.
English
1
0
1
26