orus_kelebe' 💙

There are only a few hours left until the DAO vote on the $ITL allocation ratio ends, and it looks like option 2 will pass. With this option, the distributed ratio will be 160:1. I'm planning on a 5-years locking and 120-months vesting option. What about you? #Interlink #ITL #ITLG

DISCLAIMER: This post is based on public observations, public records, public AMAs, and community concerns. Not a financial advice .Even the pictures used are just for educating or informational purpose only. No intentions to defame or for harassment purpose .Please DYOR. We as a community are not declaring @inter_link a scam. We are asking for transparency, clarification, and accountability regarding multiple unanswered questions. Question 1: “InterLink never asked users to invest money.” At the same time, ITLX swap fees are higher than many exchanges and wallets in the market. Yes, nobody is forcing users to use @itlx_defi , but the community is constantly told that HCS activity matters. If swapping, ecosystem activity, and wallet interaction are connected to HCS growth, and HCS affects migration/verification priority, then users feel indirectly pressured to participate. Without HCS growth, many people believe their chances of migration or receiving verified $ITLG become extremely low. So the community question is simple: How can the system be called fully “free” when ecosystem participation appears connected to migration opportunity? Question 2: "Leadership transparency issue" Pi Network publicly revealed its founders and leadership team. InterLink still has no publicly visible leadership structure. The community keeps asking: Who is actually running the project? Who controls the ecosystem? Who controls treasury decisions? Who controls token allocations? Transparency creates trust. Hiding leadership in a project claiming millions of users naturally creates suspicion inside the community. Questions regarding @itl_fdn and company structure. According to the whitepaper, ITL Foundation is presented as a nonprofit structure. But public records discussed by community members reportedly show: No visible chairman No visible employee records Connections to InterLink Management Group Mentions of ITU Global A director name linked as Tony I Tong If this information is incorrect, the community deserves official clarification. The bigger question is: If the @itl_fdn is nonprofit and allegedly has limited visible operational funding, then how are: nearly 100 engineers researchers SDK development infrastructure blockchain development legal/compliance expansion being funded? The community wants transparent answers. Questions regarding public claims. The NIST ranking exists publicly and can be verified. However, the community still questions other claims such as: “Google investment” finance.yahoo.com/news/interlink… x.com/inter_link/sta… These are the links for google news just claims not confirmed . “NYSE interview” @inter_link appeared in videos filmed at or associated with the New York Stock Exchange environment. Instead, the relationship appears to have been: promotional,marketing-oriented,and contract/media-partnership based. Also, “being interviewed at NYSE” does not automatically mean: listed on NYSE, approved by NYSE, audited by NYSE, endorsed by NYSE, or verified by regulators. Many companies, influencers, crypto projects, and media firms can film content around NYSE branding or studio environments through partnerships, sponsorships, or media arrangements. But New to The Street itself openly describes its business as: sponsored programming, media promotion, investor marketing, brand visibility campaigns. The same release says Vince Caruso — founder/CEO of New to The Street — became InterLink’s CMO and lead media advisor. here is the link : newswire.com/news/new-to-th… here is the link : newtothestreet.com/?utm_source=ch… "Crunchbase investment data" he statement appears to originate from InterLink/New to The Street PR,not from an independently verified Google Ventures filing,not from GV/CapitalG, and not from an official Google investor announcement. Also important: “Google for Startups” is usually a startup-support ecosystem/program. "Crunchbase entries can sometimes be:self-submitted, scraped, community-updated, or automatically aggregated." The interview shown was connected to New To The Street media promotion, not an official NYSE interview conducted by the New York Stock Exchange itself. The community is asking for direct, verifiable evidence instead of marketing wording. Verified $ITLG and migration concerns. This is one of the biggest concerns in the community. There is still no fully transparent mechanism explaining: Unverified ITLG → Verified ITLG conversion HCS scoring ACS scoring Minimum migration requirements Maximum migration percentages Verification thresholds Meanwhile: Ambassador scores were heavily reduced ACS values reportedly dropped significantly Over 600 billion ITLG is believed to have been mined Total supply discussions continue creating confusion The community believes the delay exists because the real migration structure has not been fully revealed yet. Questions regarding the 50% $ITL supply. The community is constantly asked to: lock tokens vest tokens wait 5–10 years At the same time, questions remain unanswered: Who holds the 50% supply? Which wallets contain it? Are those wallets locked? Who controls them? What prevents future dumping or a rug-pull scenario? Without wallet transparency, these concerns continue growing. Technology and testnet concerns. The community keeps hearing about: advanced blockchain technology quantum resistance payment infrastructure treasury systems real-world asset tokenization But users still cannot independently verify the testnet properly through: public wallet extensions public RPC verification publicly accessible explorer systems The only visible interaction currently appears limited inside the app ecosystem itself. The community wants independent verification. Religious and country division concerns. One of the biggest contradictions the community sees is this statement about unity while certain ambassadors are accused of creating division. @MaheshMagnus1 has repeatedly been mentioned by community members regarding: sectarian discussions country-based division religious conflict narratives during AMAs Especially when India is constantly described as contributing around 80–85% of the community growth, many users feel disappointed seeing religious or national division being introduced into the ecosystem discussion. Here is the link of @MaheshMagnus1 spitting venom : x.com/MaheshMagnus1/… If InterLink truly believes in unity, then the same standards should apply to ambassadors as well. Again: We as a community are not saying InterLink is a scam. But the actions, lack of transparency, unanswered mechanisms, leadership secrecy, and contradictory behavior are creating serious trust issues. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If a project wants trust from millions of people, then transparency cannot remain optional. #interlink #itlg #itl @BaskaranBBV @DhirajK26126238 @kv_interlink @reina_itl @Jawad0008 @Ehs87366Ehsan @kv_interlinklab @Farhankhann10 @MonikaInterlink @itl_fdn @VyxCrypto629