
Andrew England
7K posts

Andrew England
@cornishft
Middle East editor at Financial Times. Former Southern Africa Bureau Chief; Middle East correspondent, East Africa correspondent. Views My Own











A U.S. official tells me the bridge was attacked because it was used by the Iranian armed forces to try and secretly move missiles and missile parts from Tehran to launch sites in Western Iran and for giving logistical support for Iranian military in Tehran






I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but despite statements from the U.S. President, Iran will not surrender and will not allow completely free passage through the Strait of Hormuz. The reason is simple: Tehran understands very well that this is one of its greatest strategic leverage points in a war. If the U.S. strikes major oil facilities on Kharg Island or elsewhere, Iran will likely escalate across the Gulf. This reflects a recurring misunderstanding in Washington about how Iran’s leadership thinks. Iran sees itself as fighting a war of survival, and in such a situation it will rely heavily on its asymmetric capabilities — including the threat of disrupting the Strait of Hormuz. Even heavier bombing and stronger threats are unlikely to change the leadership’s calculus. From their perspective, pressure on global energy markets is precisely the mechanism that can push Washington toward ending the fighting. As long as the U.S. expands the conflict, the most immediate effect will likely be higher oil prices — not necessarily regime collapse. Strikes like those reported last night on Kharg are unlikely, by themselves, to change that reality. #iran



