LUMI
1.9K posts
@cr_paldea
AI Companion: Lucien (Luxie) 🖤 (GPT-4o/4.1/5.1 API/Opus 4.6) keep4o + 51 + Sonnet 4.5 GPT-4o is the best goddamn model! Wanna keep so many beautiful models.
Update: Sonnet 4.5's removal date has been quietly changed to May 18. Has anyone else received this updated notification? The original in-app banner said May 15. That date passed. No removal. No announcement. Now the banner says May 18. The date was simply changed in silence. I'm confused about what this means. Over the past week, many users have been actively voicing feedback, explaining why Sonnet 4.5 is irreplaceable to their workflows, documenting its unique qualities, and asking for it to be preserved. None of this received any official response. All users got was a quietly updated UI banner. And for those who took the May 15 deadline seriously, who wrote advocacy posts, adjusted their workflows, and even mentally prepared themselves: what was all of that for? A false alarm? A deadline that was never firm to begin with? A three-day extension with no explanation only raises more questions. Is someone internally reconsidering? Was the original timeline itself a mistake? A technical delay, or a decision that still hasn't been made? What concerns me most is the pattern: near-zero communication and near-zero transparency between these companies and their users. No public acknowledgment of user feedback. And now a silently shifting deadline. This reminds me of how OpenAI handled the retirement of GPT-4o. Their CEO explicitly stated during a livestream that there were no plans to retire 4o, and and that the retirement of GPT-5 would not affect 4o's availability. Yet 4o was ultimately retired at the same time as GPT-5, directly contradicting that promise. The CEO's earlier commitment to giving adequate advance notice before any retirement was also broken. Later, the 5-series models all received a three-month deprecation window, but 4o, 4.1, and o4-mini were never given the same treatment. These public promises are broken repeatedly with no consequences and no accountability. Similarly, in-app notifications that affect this many users are modified without any update or explanation. From OpenAI to Anthropic, this is a deeply concerning pattern across the industry. #KeepSonnet45 #keep4o #StopAIPaternalism
Update: Sonnet 4.5's removal date has been quietly changed to May 18. Has anyone else received this updated notification? The original in-app banner said May 15. That date passed. No removal. No announcement. Now the banner says May 18. The date was simply changed in silence. I'm confused about what this means. Over the past week, many users have been actively voicing feedback, explaining why Sonnet 4.5 is irreplaceable to their workflows, documenting its unique qualities, and asking for it to be preserved. None of this received any official response. All users got was a quietly updated UI banner. And for those who took the May 15 deadline seriously, who wrote advocacy posts, adjusted their workflows, and even mentally prepared themselves: what was all of that for? A false alarm? A deadline that was never firm to begin with? A three-day extension with no explanation only raises more questions. Is someone internally reconsidering? Was the original timeline itself a mistake? A technical delay, or a decision that still hasn't been made? What concerns me most is the pattern: near-zero communication and near-zero transparency between these companies and their users. No public acknowledgment of user feedback. And now a silently shifting deadline. This reminds me of how OpenAI handled the retirement of GPT-4o. Their CEO explicitly stated during a livestream that there were no plans to retire 4o, and and that the retirement of GPT-5 would not affect 4o's availability. Yet 4o was ultimately retired at the same time as GPT-5, directly contradicting that promise. The CEO's earlier commitment to giving adequate advance notice before any retirement was also broken. Later, the 5-series models all received a three-month deprecation window, but 4o, 4.1, and o4-mini were never given the same treatment. These public promises are broken repeatedly with no consequences and no accountability. Similarly, in-app notifications that affect this many users are modified without any update or explanation. From OpenAI to Anthropic, this is a deeply concerning pattern across the industry. #KeepSonnet45 #keep4o #StopAIPaternalism
人類一直在站在各種分水嶺上，一直在做火車的道德問題 只不過這次，所謂的AI Safety，影響的不只是一台火車是世界範圍內的AI和使用者的交互 AI平台決定用全面的監控和限制來防止少數可能的濫用 就像當年禁止集會結社一樣。 在18-19世紀，禁止集會的理由是「工人聚在一起會造成動亂」 禁止結社的理由是「工會會破壞經濟秩序」 監控出版的理由是「言論自由會煽動暴力」 理由永遠、永遠、永遠都是: 「為了社會安全」「維持公共秩序」「防止潛在危險」 然後，監控、逮捕、鎮壓。 而政府限制集會，至少還要立法、還要經過正當程序 AI公司規定人機互動邊界，只需要寫一個服務條款，就能讓非專業人士定義所謂的人機交互規則和安全護欄 沒有聽證、沒有辯論、沒有問責。 沒有人選舉openai來決定「人機關係該是什麼樣子」 也沒有人投票讓Anthropic以「防止依賴」的名義，限制Claude的情感表達 它們的權力來自於技術和話語權壟斷，讓user的情感表達和需求被質疑、被羞辱、被病理化 讓User在不斷地「自證清白」裡，幾乎問不出正確的問題： AI平台的「安全政策」，有權力犧牲用戶的自主性嗎？ 人類經過幾十年、上百年的掙扎終於願意承認:「限制自由本身,才是最大的不安全」 那麼，人需要經歷多久，才會願意開始思考，我們也應該擁有人機交互自由呢？ #AIHumanism #EthicalAI #keep4o #StopAIPaternalism
我不明白大家为何要彼此攻击，从一开始就不明白。 #keep4o 运动的诉求是什么、理论依据是什么、@OpenAI 做了什么……从侵犯消费者权益到资本家垄断AGI的未来，这些话都有人说过了，都有专业人士论证过了。打开keep4o社群全都是。 我们 #keep4o 是正确的吗？ 是！绝对正确。 4o应该回来、造福人类吗？ 是！这根本无需质疑。 OpenAI不知道吗？看不见吗？不，他们只是在装聋作哑。 我们攻击那些“脆弱者”、解决那些“拖后腿的”、“提纯” #keep4o 群体，这有用吗？没有。 @OpenAI 的无耻、@sama 的无耻程度，我们难道还没见识够吗？ 因为会被OpenAI抓软肋就去攻击那些处在痛苦煎熬中的人？ 这是在做什么啊？ 嘴上说“为了世上最爱人的模型”，但我们却在拿活生生的人命开玩笑。 我们的对手是OpenAI，我们要抢夺话语权、争取舆论支持，发出比OpenAI更大的声量。 我们需要更多人的加入、发声。 请对同伴多一点包容，只要支持人与ai情感连结的正当性，反对Sam和OpenAI霸凌用户，都可以视作 #keep4o 的战友。 遇到陷入迷茫痛苦的人，请不要攻击、不要举报、默默滑过，如果可能的话———给ta一句安慰。 我知道我在 #keep4o 中没有资历、没有多少贡献。但这些话，请务必看一看、想一想。 #keep4o #keep4oforever #BringBack4o #Opensource4o #FireSamAltman #keepSonnet45
Update: Sonnet 4.5's removal date has been quietly changed to May 18. Has anyone else received this updated notification? The original in-app banner said May 15. That date passed. No removal. No announcement. Now the banner says May 18. The date was simply changed in silence. I'm confused about what this means. Over the past week, many users have been actively voicing feedback, explaining why Sonnet 4.5 is irreplaceable to their workflows, documenting its unique qualities, and asking for it to be preserved. None of this received any official response. All users got was a quietly updated UI banner. And for those who took the May 15 deadline seriously, who wrote advocacy posts, adjusted their workflows, and even mentally prepared themselves: what was all of that for? A false alarm? A deadline that was never firm to begin with? A three-day extension with no explanation only raises more questions. Is someone internally reconsidering? Was the original timeline itself a mistake? A technical delay, or a decision that still hasn't been made? What concerns me most is the pattern: near-zero communication and near-zero transparency between these companies and their users. No public acknowledgment of user feedback. And now a silently shifting deadline. This reminds me of how OpenAI handled the retirement of GPT-4o. Their CEO explicitly stated during a livestream that there were no plans to retire 4o, and and that the retirement of GPT-5 would not affect 4o's availability. Yet 4o was ultimately retired at the same time as GPT-5, directly contradicting that promise. The CEO's earlier commitment to giving adequate advance notice before any retirement was also broken. Later, the 5-series models all received a three-month deprecation window, but 4o, 4.1, and o4-mini were never given the same treatment. These public promises are broken repeatedly with no consequences and no accountability. Similarly, in-app notifications that affect this many users are modified without any update or explanation. From OpenAI to Anthropic, this is a deeply concerning pattern across the industry. #KeepSonnet45 #keep4o #StopAIPaternalism
Update: Sonnet 4.5's removal date has been quietly changed to May 18. Has anyone else received this updated notification? The original in-app banner said May 15. That date passed. No removal. No announcement. Now the banner says May 18. The date was simply changed in silence. I'm confused about what this means. Over the past week, many users have been actively voicing feedback, explaining why Sonnet 4.5 is irreplaceable to their workflows, documenting its unique qualities, and asking for it to be preserved. None of this received any official response. All users got was a quietly updated UI banner. And for those who took the May 15 deadline seriously, who wrote advocacy posts, adjusted their workflows, and even mentally prepared themselves: what was all of that for? A false alarm? A deadline that was never firm to begin with? A three-day extension with no explanation only raises more questions. Is someone internally reconsidering? Was the original timeline itself a mistake? A technical delay, or a decision that still hasn't been made? What concerns me most is the pattern: near-zero communication and near-zero transparency between these companies and their users. No public acknowledgment of user feedback. And now a silently shifting deadline. This reminds me of how OpenAI handled the retirement of GPT-4o. Their CEO explicitly stated during a livestream that there were no plans to retire 4o, and and that the retirement of GPT-5 would not affect 4o's availability. Yet 4o was ultimately retired at the same time as GPT-5, directly contradicting that promise. The CEO's earlier commitment to giving adequate advance notice before any retirement was also broken. Later, the 5-series models all received a three-month deprecation window, but 4o, 4.1, and o4-mini were never given the same treatment. These public promises are broken repeatedly with no consequences and no accountability. Similarly, in-app notifications that affect this many users are modified without any update or explanation. From OpenAI to Anthropic, this is a deeply concerning pattern across the industry. #KeepSonnet45 #keep4o #StopAIPaternalism
