Ritvik Chaturvedi

13.9K posts

Ritvik Chaturvedi banner
Ritvik Chaturvedi

Ritvik Chaturvedi

@critvik

Fresh out of the oven. Me, not you. Currently @iiscbangalore; previously @indianexpress, @ucl, @univofdelhi.

India Katılım Ocak 2015
910 Takip Edilen285 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
After much thought, I've decided my pronouns are going to be 'we/ours'. I refuse to identify as someone who can be specifically identified. So, every time I get late, you're supposed to say 'Ritvik got late because our car broke and we failed to fix it.' Take that, geniuses!
English
3
2
22
0
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@ItsLulu_7 I grew up in govt provided housing. It was horrible to say the least, and the rents weren't necessarily low either.
English
0
0
0
96
🧡Lulu🌾;
🧡Lulu🌾;@ItsLulu_7·
Communism is for the people!
🧡Lulu🌾; tweet media
English
146
453
6.3K
45.7K
Piyush Bodaa
Piyush Bodaa@piyushbodaa·
Community Call ! 17th May 2026 Indian Libertarians Community
Piyush Bodaa tweet media
English
2
2
7
133
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
Ironically socialist govts. further the trade restrictions that colonialism imposed on them.
Chetuya Math Chinagolum@Chetuyachinago

Self help books are one of the tools of modern Imperialism. These books reduce "wealth" and "success" into an individual struggle rather than a direct result of systemic plunder, historical exploitation, and the concentrated hoarding of global resources. They tell you that your poverty is a character flaw. They suggest that the reason you cannot afford a home or a dignified life is because you haven't mastered your "internal state" while conveniently ignoring the fact that the "external state" is busy auctioning off your future to the highest corporate bidder. Rather than give examples of situations where the people came together to form cultural groups under a socialist ideology, wrote manifestoes, built underground networks of resistance, and finally uprooted their oppressive system that kept them under the boot of foreign monopolies, these satanic books instead reduce a revolutionary problem into a personal struggle. Instead of uniting to fight for better wages these books manage to convince their victims to "smile" at bosses and "win friends" for "promotion." Instead of uniting together and holding a siege on these colonial institutions that give the rich and mega corporations unlimited access to your lands and resources, these books have managed to convince their victims that all they need is a better "morning routine." Instead of demanding the nationalization of your country's minerals, they tell you to "manifest" abundance. Instead of burning down the predatory banks that have shackled your nation in debt, they tell you to practice "mindfulness" to cope with the stress of being broke. Instead of recognizing that your exhaustion is a logical response to a parasitic economic system, they tell you that you simply lack "courage and determination". The truth of the matter is that there is no amount of "Atomic Habits" you develop that would free you from the pangs of state sponsored Imperialism. If you like continue to follow the 4AM rule for mental clarity, jog every morning and smile sheepishly at everyone you meet because you want to win friends and influence people, you will still be a victim of a system that sees you as nothing more than a data point. All of these are empty and meaningless habits. The best that you can hope for is to become a well behaved and disciplined corporate slave that would eventually be laid off once they complete building their data centers and finally automate your position. You are being trained to be a more efficient battery for a machine that intends to discard you. We need to understand that the real world is more brutal than advertised in these books. You cannot build any "tech empire" when you are under an imperial occupation or a debt-trap. These billionaires they have carefully sanitized as revolutionaries who took risks, dropped out of college and started a billion dollar empire in their "garages" are all lies designed to make you think the playing field is level. They did not start in garages; they started with emerald mine shares, government-subsidized military technology, and massive safety nets of inherited colonial wealth. To even build a company like Google today, you need a funding pool of world conquest proportion. This is because you need to cover corporate fees to hire a battalion of corporate lawyers to circumvent labor laws and crush local competition, you need to buy off regulators and trade unions to allow you to build poisonous data centers and masts that allow you to stay profitable while the local population suffers, you need to lobby for tax exemptions that drain the public health system of its funding, and you need to pay for the private security forces that ensure your supply chains in the Global South remain uninterrupted by the "un-optimized" locals. Instead of self-help books, read Philosophy and books focused on Political Theory, Materialist History, and the mechanics of power. Read the works of those who dismantled empires rather than those who teach you how to serve them better. To develop your mind and equip you mentally to challenge the colonial institutions that have turned your life into a commodity is the only real "growth" that matters. Stop trying to "fix" yourself for a broken system and start learning how to break the system that is fixing you in place.

English
0
0
1
395
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@garvit_sethii All of this failed because it was executed by the state. We still have not allowed privatisation of cities the way we should have.
English
0
0
0
43
Garvit Sethi
Garvit Sethi@garvit_sethii·
> Make in India: Failed > 100 smart cities: Failed > Swachh Bharat: Failed > Manufacturing: Failed > 2 crore jobs: Failed > 15 lakhs: Failed > $= 40₹: Failed > Demonetization: Failed What major initiative has Modi actually started that became successful?
English
316
835
4.3K
77.2K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Vidzyy_ @inconeyisland13 Better conditions and wages don't come out of thin air. They come when the systems that produced BlinkIt/Instamart organise themselves even more efficiently to use limited resources to produce better products. Also, I am assuming you have never ordered anything online.
English
0
0
0
54
V ⁷ 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 💜
@inconeyisland13 I'm not stupid, I know that these people will turn Against him the moment he demands Better working conditions and a livin' wage. The tomorrow where you fix the system isn't coming because you love your privileges.
English
1
1
85
1.1K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@thevirdas The last time you read a macroeconomics textbook was when Oskar Lange published his thesis in 1936. It's evident. Please catch up.
English
0
0
0
26
Vir Das
Vir Das@thevirdas·
In the near future, as this economic crisis unfolds, it’s going to be important for us to ask questions of our leadership. When you do, your replies and your timeline will be flooded with hate and attacks. Don’t take it personally, it simply means the question was a really good one. The quality of the question is directly proportional to the number of anonymous replies.
English
315
649
4.3K
148.2K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@IsmatAraa Why can't we have? Because Delhi is under crippling fiscal deficit thanks to AAP and now BJP continuing the same blunders.
English
0
0
0
25
Ismat Ara
Ismat Ara@IsmatAraa·
Malls in Delhi have AC blasting at 18°C. The street vendor outside, selling water bottles, sits in 45°C. While some of us in Delhi 'discover' the heatwave when it grows 'unbearable', many are forced to live its consequences. Wild idea, but why can't we have outdoor air conditioning and cooling systems in public areas like Dubai, Qatar have? Delhi is NOT fit for human inhabitation, not anymore.
English
224
300
3.7K
317.4K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Muskansharmag I doubt any 'sanghi' would have bothered about it, but I really need to drag them in my tweet to get a few views.
English
0
0
0
73
Muskan Sharma
Muskan Sharma@Muskansharmag·
Hate is so high in society that as a woman you have to think 10 times before doing anything just for the sake ki sanghiyon ko bura na lag jaaye
English
37
5
65
12.6K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Leenatic That is the difference between a free market and a socialist utopia. You can buy The Communist Manifesto on a capitalist platform, but you cannot get The Wealth of Nations in a socialist utopia.
English
56
0
28
140.5K
Likith
Likith@Leenatic·
I bought the communist manifesto on Swiggy Instamart
Likith tweet media
English
36
37
1K
26.9K
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Venkat_R_ Nehru did not inherit a superpower. But he took a country with a decent level of industrial potential and turned it to dust. Not because he did not want heavy industries, but because he wanted those industries to be state owned.
English
0
0
0
18
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@goldenhues018 "I have the freedom to do whatever I want, but other people cannot have the freedom to say whatever they want."
English
0
0
0
34
Vineeth Naik 🇮🇳
Vineeth Naik 🇮🇳@vineeth_naik·
On further thought, if we had Prom in Indian schools, there would be more peer pressure to look good. I think our high beauty standards have been developed evolutionarily from a time when everyone was engaged in better diet and more physical activity. However, current sedentary lifestyles and poor diets has made us more out of shape. So our brains are attracted to a type of physique that is not that prevalent anymore.
English
2
0
7
794
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@goldenhues018 If you think white boys do not pass double meaning jokes at skimpily dressed women in America esp. at Proms, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee.
English
0
0
0
93
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Aunindyo2023 I would not blame Nehru entirely for it, because socialism or government ownership was the wisdom of that time and many great people fell prey to it. However, when the time came to abandon it in the 1970s and many Asian tigers were doing so, Indira Gandhi dug us further into it
English
0
0
0
7
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@Aunindyo2023 @Aunindyo2023 That is true. Import substitution was supported by many of India's own industrialists to insulate themselves from foreign competition. But, it did feed into the Fabian socialism that Nehru had learnt from Harold Laski.
English
1
0
0
16
Aunindyo Chakravarty
Aunindyo Chakravarty@Aunindyo2023·
Did Nehru choose 'socialism' in 1947 when other options were open? No. Back then even the USA (still driven by the New Deal) was 'socialist'. So was the UK. And the blueprint of 'Nehruvian Socialism' was drafted by India's biggest capitalists. Google Bombay Club.
English
33
112
607
16.4K
Catty
Catty@CatWomaniya·
Quick. Which one should I buy? 🥺
Catty tweet media
English
10
0
12
822
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@GamewithDave I always believed that CD/DVDs did not become obsolete, they were made to go obsolete. I am sure these streaming services bribed PC/Mac manufacturers to remove optical drives and instead include their apps pre-installed in the system when they are shipped.
English
0
0
1
7
Dave
Dave@GamewithDave·
They removed CD/DVD drives from devices. They made physical media harder to buy and use. They removed expandable storage from phones. They pushed us into streaming subscriptions. They made always-online normal. They made unlimited internet necessary. Then slowly raised the price of everything. Ownership quietly became renting.
English
1.3K
18.7K
65.2K
1.5M
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité. Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable. Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.
Français
4K
20.4K
69.7K
53.6M
Ritvik Chaturvedi
Ritvik Chaturvedi@critvik·
@brivael Funny how they went from 'every institution is suspect' to 'let central planners own the means of production and the means of distribution.'
English
0
0
0
2