Crypto_Forever

4K posts

Crypto_Forever

Crypto_Forever

@cryptoforever87

Katılım Temmuz 2024
70 Takip Edilen69 Takipçiler
vain
vain@vainxyz·
Low market cap. Massive potential. What’s the ticker?
English
214
27
143
5.6K
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
𝕋𝕖𝕞𝕞𝕪🦇🔊
i can't stop thinking about the drift protocol hack. not because of the $280m. we've seen big numbers before. i can't stop thinking about how it happened. and what it says about everything we're building. on april 1st, while people were posting jokes, an attacker drained $280 million from drift protocol in minutes. the team had to literally tweet "this is not an april fools joke." but this didn't start on april 1st. it started on march 23rd. that's when the attacker created four durable nonce accounts. two tied to drift's own security council multisig members. two controlled by the attacker. quietly. no alarms. no flags. on march 27th, drift migrated their security council due to a routine member change. by march 30th, the attacker had already compromised a signer on the new multisig too. then on april 1st, they executed. a test transaction first. then one minute later, two pre-signed transactions fired four slots apart. admin takeover. withdrawal limits removed. a malicious asset introduced. every vault drained. jlp. sol. btc. usdc. over 15 tokens gone. the entire thing took minutes. this wasn't a bug. this wasn't a smart contract exploit. this wasn't a flash loan or an oracle manipulation. drift's own report confirms it (you can check @DriftProtocol's latest to confirm). no compromised seed phrases. no code vulnerability. this was social engineering. the attacker got 2 out of 5 multisig signers to approve transactions they didn't fully understand. used durable nonces to pre-sign them. then waited. patiently. for over a week. two signatures out of five. that was the security standing between users and $280 million. two out of five. i keep coming back to that number because this is the part that should make everyone uncomfortable. not the hack itself. the architecture that made it possible. we've seen this before. we've seen this so many times. bybit. $1.4 billion. the attacker compromised the signing infrastructure and tricked signers into authorizing malicious transactions. same concept. social engineering. not code. ronin bridge. $625 million. compromised validator keys. same story. cetus protocol. $223 million. different method but same result. hundreds of millions gone. in 2025 alone, $3.4 billion was stolen in crypto. and the pattern is almost always the same. not brilliant code exploits. not zero-day vulnerabilities. someone was tricked. a key was exposed. a human made a mistake. only 19% of hacked protocols even used multi-sig wallets. and the ones that did, like drift, got beaten anyway. because the weakest link was never the code. it was always the person holding the key. now here's what makes me angry. i've seen people dunking on solana over this. blaming svm. questioning the entire chain. the same thing happened after bybit when people started questioning evm and ethereum's security model. this is not a solana problem. this is not an ethereum problem. this is not chain-specific at all. drift's own report says it clearly. the programs and smart contracts worked exactly as designed. the chain did what it was supposed to do. a human was tricked into signing something they shouldn't have. that can happen on any chain. any protocol. any ecosystem. pointing fingers at solana is a deflection. and it's net negative for the entire space because it distracts from the real conversation we need to have. which brings me to circle. nine days before the drift hack, circle froze 16 business wallets overnight. legitimate companies. crypto exchanges. forex platforms. payment processors. no criminal charges. a sealed civil lawsuit that nobody could even read. no advance warning. businesses woke up and couldn't process payments, couldn't settle trades, couldn't serve their customers. zachxbt called it "potentially the single most incompetent freeze" he'd seen in over five years of investigations. one of the frozen wallets wasn't even a business. it was a dfinity bridge contract used by thousands of users who had nothing to do with the case. then nine days later, $280 million is being drained from drift in real time. the attacker is converting stolen tokens through jupiter, bridging them to ethereum, moving funds through circle's own cross-chain transfer protocol. and the freeze didn't come fast enough. so circle can shut down 16 legitimate businesses overnight for a civil case. but a quarter billion being actively stolen through their own infrastructure? different speed. i'm not saying circle is the villain here. i'm saying the system is broken in ways that should concern everyone. now think about who's actually affected by drift. it's not just traders. protocols are built on top of drift. neobanks integrate with defi infrastructure. real customers with no idea what a multisig even is woke up and saw they couldn't access their money. some platforms said user funds are safe. but nobody could withdraw. your money is "safe" but you can't touch it. think about what that feels like for someone who just wanted a better savings rate. i know what it feels like on a smaller scale. i lost $5,000 to social engineering. it's nothing compared to $280 million. but the feeling is the same. that moment when you realize the funds are gone and there's nothing you can do. it doesn't scale with the dollar amount. it's the same pit in your stomach whether it's $5k or $280m. and here's the question i keep circling back to. we say defi is the future. we say we're going to onboard the next billion users. we say this technology will replace traditional finance and bank the unbanked and give people financial sovereignty. but how do we onboard millions of people into a system where a social engineering attack can drain a quarter billion dollars in minutes? where 2 out of 5 signatures is considered security for $280m? where the attacker sets up wallets two weeks early, runs a test transaction, and nobody notices? where circle can freeze legitimate businesses overnight but can't stop a live heist fast enough? where the same attack, the same playbook, the same human error keeps happening year after year after year? ronin. bybit. cetus. now drift. same cause. different name. different chain. same result. defi doesn't have a code problem. it has a people problem. and we keep solving for the code. i haven't interacted with a protocol in a while. i like money. but i love safety more. and right now this space is asking me to choose between the two. security can't keep being the last conversation. it can't keep being the thing we talk about after the hack and forget about before the next one. it has to be the first priority. not the last. because right now we're not ready for the next billion users. we're barely keeping the ones we have safe.
English
85
80
539
55K
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Satoshi Sunrise
Satoshi Sunrise@_SatoshiSunrise·
Day 3 update: •Held floor after first hype wave •Higher lows forming •Buyers still stepping in This isn’t a pump, it’s a base forming. Weak hands gone. Next leg loads from here. ☀️
Satoshi Sunrise tweet media
English
5
3
18
223
soap
soap@soapweb3·
ZERO RUG Strong community Low market cap What’s the ticker?
English
229
10
149
8.8K
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Mad Coin 😡
Mad Coin 😡@devmadcoin·
people value 💸MONEY💸 over ⌛️TIME ⌛️and that's why you will stay $mad and broke 😡
English
5
2
9
111
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Satoshi Sunrise
Satoshi Sunrise@_SatoshiSunrise·
good morning! that moon last night looked incredible can’t wait to see what the morning brings
English
7
2
16
144
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Hades
Hades@0xhades_·
Small update, 13.37% of supply is locked by conviction holders for at least 1 month, you guys are goats, and 815 USD has been claimed in RWAs by $VAULT holders since launch. I’m not stopping until more people know @VaultBags, much higher! @BagsApp mode!
Hades tweet media
Hades@0xhades_

GM. @VaultBags has rewarded holders with over 760 USD since launch. 10% of supply is locked on Streamflow by conviction holders for at least 1 month, with many locking for over 3 months. @BagsApp mode. This is just the beginning! 🫡

English
7
6
27
1.1K
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Crypto Vista
Crypto Vista@supercycle202·
$vault 👇🏽💎 $VAULT isn’t just another token — it’s a yield engine. This is where capital stops sitting idle and starts working overtime. Real-world assets, consistent fee generation, and locked supply combine into a system designed to reward holders relentlessly. Every cycle, every transaction, every flow feeds back into the vault — creating a compounding machine that turns patience into profit. You’re not chasing pumps… you’re plugged into a system that prints. Set it. Hold it. Let $VAULT pay you.
Crypto Vista tweet media
English
0
3
9
141
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Hades
Hades@0xhades_·
The 70% pool funds were distributed proportionally based on current holders’ holdings or locks. Unclaimed rewards from old holders who sold can now be claimed by current holders based on their share. Everything always flows back to holders. Also, if you’re locking tokens your stimmy is higher, you get plus 50% compared to unlocked supply thanks to the lock boost pool, and that bonus also applied to this distribution. Happy April start! @VaultBags
English
4
5
18
346
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Jamie Bellhouse
Jamie Bellhouse@BellhouseJamie·
$VAULT made me $51.99 in rewards in 5 days JUST FOR BEING A HOLDER! Not because the chart went up ❌ Not because I sold a penny ❌ Because I was rewarded just for being a holder✅🏆 Let’s look at the numbers! 👀 25.5% in 5 days 🤯 Breaking that down: •Per day (average): 5.1% •If sustained for 30 days (simple): 153% • $200 → $506 in a month (theoretically if volume and price stay the same ) This is REWARDS!!! that I clam every day….just for holding the token and the best part!….if you lock your tokens you get a 50% bonus reward on your locked amount! @VaultBags thank you! What a real gem 🏆🚀 #CryptoGem #vault #cryptonews #freemoney
Jamie Bellhouse tweet media
English
2
6
11
585
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
J
J@bigbetenergy69·
Who doesn’t like passive income?
J tweet media
English
0
1
8
89
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Hades
Hades@0xhades_·
Now that locking tokens on Streamflow is a thing and gives @VaultBags holders benefits like up to 50% boost on claims, plus helps clean the distro, why not show it on the site? You can now see exactly how much $VAULT supply is locked by holders at vaultbags.app/treasury, along with stats like total RWAs claimed and current pool balances. We’ve distributed 737 USD in RWAs to $VAULT holders and 8.48% of supply is locked! This is just the beginning, still grinding every day to deliver!
Hades tweet media
English
25
12
52
1.4K
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Crypto Vista
Crypto Vista@supercycle202·
@coingecko Guys when will you be listing the passive income monster @VaultBags 4iCRYJHvwUE21duaQ1nQcUXkh7wYNQai9aBihd3FBAGS
Crypto Vista tweet media
English
4
3
9
152
Crypto_Forever retweetledi
Emircan Şahin
Emircan Şahin@EmircanSahinX·
The AI went wild when it saw $MONDAY's vibe score, and the risk score is also very low. This could be the new trend, and everyone here is probably just getting started. A meme that could rise to +5m! CA: 38WpEwBXZykbwDtdSnvL6KboowyQUXdAb5MQHBHupump x.com/xaxiosai_new/s…
English
1
5
16
1.2K