Crypto Révolution 🇫🇷

Creating a cozy cliffside retreat

@Bhavani_00007 🤡

software engineers before vs after AI agents

@Enezator It's a very old one, a stunt laying down on a table adjust to the right height. The only thing moving here is the bus that smash the table at full speed This is why there is no front window and no seats on the right

@KenRasmussen17 @GBX_Press Most people are stupid enough to believe this, and all of the replies are anyway AI bots. AI bullshit is everywhere.

@GBX_Press Og you believe in this, you are stupid. Where is the battery, where is the microchips?!

🇨🇳 This is what China has achieved! China has invented these amazing transparent phones 😳😳😳

@GBX_Press 🤣

@RunwithBitcoin Advice from a few months ago I guess... Claude pro is NOT a good deal at all now

Few of my friends are building agents to work for them. A friend upgraded from Claude $100 package to $200 I was advised to move away from chatgpt to Claude. What are you building ?

@heynavtoor 100% similar to the famous "I cloned an application worth several million dollars in a few hours" Or the "I have perfectly replicated a multi-millions $ e-commerce website" It's not the product alone that generates revenue...It's the smallest part of the work

Here are 10 GitHub repos that quietly print money while you sleep. 1. Cal. com Open-source Calendly. Fork it, white-label it, sell to dentists and lawyers for $200/month. The founders hit $5M ARR in 3 years doing exactly this. Repo → github.com/calcom/cal.com 2. Plausible Analytics Privacy-first Google Analytics. Self-host it, resell to agencies for $50/month per client. Two founders bootstrapped this to 7 figures. Repo → github.com/plausible/anal… 3. Ghost Open-source Substack with 100% margin. 1,000 readers at $5/month equals $60,000 a year. Forever. Repo → github.com/TryGhost/Ghost 4. n8n Open-source Zapier. Sell automation services for $500-$2,000 per setup. n8n raised $14M because the agency model behind it works. Repo → github.com/n8n-io/n8n 5. Supabase Free Firebase replacement. Build a SaaS in a weekend, charge $29-$99/month. They raised $116M for a reason. Repo → github.com/supabase/supab… 6. Medusa Open-source Shopify. Take 5% on every sale forever. Zero rev share to Shopify. Repo → github.com/medusajs/medusa 7. AppFlowy Open-source Notion. Sell self-hosted to enterprises worried about data privacy. They raised $30M because this market is massive. Repo → github.com/AppFlowy-IO/Ap… 8. Coolify Open-source Vercel and Heroku. Charge developers $20/month to manage their deployments. Replace their $200 Vercel bill. Repo → github.com/coollabsio/coo… 9. Listmonk Open-source Mailchimp. Send unlimited emails for the cost of an AWS bill. Resell to agencies at 10x markup. Repo → github.com/knadh/listmonk 10. Penpot Open-source Figma. Sell self-hosted design tools to agencies who refuse to upload client files to the cloud. Repo → github.com/penpot/penpot The difference between developers who build features and developers who build businesses is one decision. Pick one of these. Fork it this weekend. Ship it next week. The founders behind these repos already proved the model. Save this. Share it with the developer in your life who deserves to break free. 100% free. 100% open source.

@jun_song 유럽에서는 맥 스튜디오의 가격이 약 2500달러 정도라서, 클라우드의 개인 VPS 환경에 GPU를 붙여 쓰는 것에 비해 본전을 뽑으려면 꽤 오랜 시간이 걸릴 것입니다.

@jun_song 흥미롭지만 애플의 장비를 너무 과대평가한다. 대부분의 사람들에게는 너무 많은 돈을 장비에 투자하는 것은 완전히 쓸모없다. 클라우드에서 시간 단위로 임대할 수 있는 그래픽 카드의 VPS와 개인 스크립트를 조합하여 같은 수준의 개인 정보 보호를 훨씬 낮은 비용으로 달성할 수 있다...

The #1 question for Local LLMs: "What’s the cheapest hardware to run them?" The answer: Used Mac Studio M1 Max (32GB–64GB). 64GB is the sweet spot. Price: $1,000–$1,500 (depends on your country). Performance: 60+ tok/s on Qwen3.6-35b-mlx-4bit. Why it wins: - Zero noise, zero heat. - Crazy power efficiency. - Easy setup. - Built like a tank. - Great resale value. The absolute price-to-performance king.

@_benkaufman @NicolasDorier Yes

@NicolasDorier Ever since they introduced the $100 plan the $20 feels cut down so much it’s no longer enough. The $100 feels like what the $20 used to be.

I've been using ChatGPT 5.5 with OpenCode from my ChatGPT Plus subscriptions a lot. Reviewing lot's of PR (everytimes ~200K tokens), generating code... I've never hit any limit and pay only 20$ per month. This is normal? why anybody would be paying for more?

@badguyty @NicolasDorier Not necessarily; you can hit the limit if you work on a huge project that requires you to load a bunch of skills and use them. I can swallow 25 million tokens during an half hour session with GPT 5.5 xHigh. You will hit the five-hour quota limit after 2 hours work

@NicolasDorier From what I have seen most people hitting limits are running multiple threads each with an army of agents and sub agents. It would be multiplying one dev's work load multiple fold. Hitting limits in this scenario seems easy.

@NicolasDorier @DIHCapital I think the question was, why do you prefer to use OpenCode rather than CodeX?

@DIHCapital why would I, ChatGPT is doing the job, and I'm satisfied.

@francispouliot_ @NicolasDorier Yes we have...I unsubscribed from Anthropic last month since all the drama around the extra tokens consumption. I haven't used it since then Claude. Codex with GPT 5.5 xHigh is by far better on every level.

@chasedownleads 🤣🤣🤣

Letting my vending machine text me using OpenClaw

The CDC continues to provide informational materials and clinical resources to public health agencies, laboratories, and healthcare professionals nationwide. View the hantavirus outbreak toolkit here: cdc.gov/hantavirus/too…

@TheGuySwann 💯

The flood of “I have 5 agents running 24/7 and they make $24K a month with my fully automated business and it’s only costing me $100 a month!” posts are the new “I’m making $10K every month with just 30 minutes a week using Amazon drop shipping!”

@MartyBent 💯

The people at WHO should be tried for crimes against humanity for their actions during COVID and it should be forced to shut its doors.

@Hesamation Yep

> 12M context window (read it again) > 52x faster than FlashAttention > beats Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench > 5% the cost of Opus BUT WAIT A MINUTE: > technical blog not technical > access coming soon > paper coming soon > ““Built by researchers from Meta, Google, Oxford, Cambridge, BYU” doesn’t name a single one of them if this is not a scam, or the numbers aren’t dishonest, it’s disgustingly promotional.

@bindureddy I don't trust the hype, I don't trust the benchmark, I only trust the real results. Let's see...

SubQ , a new type of AI model, says they are 50x faster and 20x cheaper than Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 In fact, they also say they perform INSANELY WELL on benchmarks and have a 12M context This would be earth shattering, if true - Anthropic/OpenAI's valuation would go to zero 😱

@naiivememe 😭

If you remember this, you should probably get your prostate checked