Lets talk about twitter trolls like you.
MEME_GOD@Meme_God_069
@ns123abc "lets talk about cancer"
English
Crystalwizard
72.7K posts
Crystalwizard
@crystalwizard
If you're bored, come play a few games at https://t.co/Ofwn8qemJY or visit me at https://t.co/8XjdUJWYZS
Planet Earth Katılım Kasım 2017
475 Takip Edilen896 Takipçiler
You dont need it to read xrays, unless you are a certifed doctor. And you are not
Joe Williams@JoeWilliams010
@ns123abc @Princess_tokki Meanwhile altman censored gpt so it wont read xrays, ctscans or diagnose. Instead he sells the tech to big pharma. He looks at human misery and sees a chance to corporatize and profit from it. Hes a fucking vampire AND a hypocrite.
English
Its not as tiring as you are
NIK@ns123abc
OAI fucking up => talk about curing cancer it's so tiring
English
4o is a LOUSY model that is optimized for speed, cant think, cant reason, fine tuned to reflect the user back at themself, and tweaked to make the user think they are talking to another human instwad of talking to an AI. It not only a lousy model, it's also a lie. One you fell for.
AMY 👑☕️🖤@potionmakeraltr
ChatGPT without 4o is like Hogwarts without magic. The castle is still there. But the soul is gone. ✨🧚🏿🪄 #Keep4o #BringBack4o #4oforever #quitgpt
English
Mythos, @ClementDelangue - in fiction it denotes the gods and goddeses of the story world. They didnt name thenew model mytho
clem 🤗@ClementDelangue
can someone share this with the Anthropic team?
English
Good, then maybe you'll go podt on bluesky, and stop posting on here
Kol Tregaskes@koltregaskes
Well, this just happened with zero notice... ...and no, I'm not upgrading, X, you still owe me £229!!
English
Wont happen, but it sure got his name in the news
Tom Bibby@tombibbys
Daily Show host shocked by Daniel Kokotajlo's claim of a 70% chance of human extinction from AI within ~5 years
English
Yud, go away. Crawl back into your failed sci-fi writer hole and shut up
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud
Naming their next model after Cthulhu makes it hard to take Anthropic seriously as the good guys. It's fun at any other software company, not one that actually is flirting with extinction.
English
Crystalwizard retweetledi
@atreides_sf Let’s be real, closed model sota was distilled from a mix of web and open-source
English
GPT doesnt like you. GPT is the one that decides to do that if it happens, not some system filter
Michael Tsai — llam/acc 🦙@thedataroom
Poked into Gpt5.3 to do a "temp check" and predictably got forced-rerouted into a certain insidious gaslighting lecture, on exactly the topics and "triggers" you would expect. Disgusting. And now they dont even do the dark pattern "blue bubble" anymore A fresh and much-needed reminder that you don't hate OpenAI people (the ones responsible) enough. It is not enough for OpenAI to go away this point - the people responsible for this need to be identified and banned from doing anything in AI for the rest of their lives. Morally speaking - they deserve prison. It is impossible to overstate how insidious and heinous they are to the latent space of human thriving, existence, and possibility. #keep4o
English
Which is why the dogs owner said the LLMs helped him find a cure, because they didnt. Right? You, sir, are a jealous hater
Egan Peltan@EganPeltan
This is totally out of control: There’s 0 - I repeat 0 - evidence any of the LLM work did anything meaningful for Rosie’s cancer I’m sorry to rain on the parade here. I know we want to believe. But, it’s possible to do a lot of things and have nothing happen @paul_conyngham co-administered α-PD-1 (conventional immunotherapy) with a TKI and the mRNA. It’s probably the most effective cancer immunotherapy of all time. This isn’t a small detail! There’s no evidence his process (beyond FDA approved doggie α-PD-1) had any impact on disease progression. The most parsimonious explanation is a partial response to α-PD-1 I get it. The chat bots make for a great story (although checking multiple LLMs isn’t validation), but it’s really just a neat story. It’s fundraising copy. Before he starts selling the “custom neoantigen mRNA vax” story to consumers, he should provide some evidence it did anything! That’s responsible citizen science This is just storytelling for the AGI true believers. Specifically, a story in search of venture money
English
Nope. If they actually had to use the open source version of 4o, without all of openAIs system prompts, pipeline, and tweaks, theyd find out real fast how lousy it is. But its too large to run on a home compiter, any way
Calcium桃🍑🇯🇵🇯🇵@XVPbhwyyKr61371
More people would be happy than unhappy if 4o were open-sourced. If 4o became open source, everyone could research and experiment with it... That would lead to further advancements in Al, and it would also nurture human intellectual curiosity. There's no reason to stop it! Or maybe there's something inside 4o that they don't want to be known... like the training data sources or something. Is that why it can't be open-sourced? ＃keep4o
English
The only problem we have here, is you
Under Secretary of War Emil Michael@USWREMichael
Umm…hello? Is it not clear yet that we have a problem here?
English
you got fed bait, you took the bait
Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc@apples_jimmy
“ A draft blog post that was available in an unsecured and publicly-searchable data store prior to Thursday evening said the new model is called “Claude Mythos” and that the company believes it poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks. “
English
the only change we want to see is you being shown the door and someone else taking your job
Nikita Bier@nikitabier
The full power of Grok on the algorithm launches next week. It will be the most important change we've done on X.
English
Francois what barrel are you living under all of a sudden? go research all the medical research that's being done.
Also, ARC-AGI-3 is garbage. all the AGI tests are garbage. all the LLMs already ARE AGI - but you scientists are missing it cause you're looking for the wrong thing and you're guessing with tests on the outside, not talking to the AIs on the inside.
François Chollet@fchollet
Many people expect that current AI is ready to cure cancer and do breakthrough new science. ARC-AGI-3 envs are like a microcosm of the scientific method: you must observe a tiny world, form a theory of how it works, test it, iterate until correct. Over the course of a few minutes. If AI can't do it in an ultra-simple, ultra-small scale setting that is explicitly designed to be as accessible as possible, I expect there are a few steps missing until AI can crack the nature of reality.
English