jam retweetledi
jam
3.7K posts
@jenniferelle_ @PierrePoilievre You support mass incarcerating indigenous people
English
@jenniferelle_ @PierrePoilievre Do you support his “tough on crime” policies that will only further the mass incarceration of indigenous people? You claim to be pro-indigenous and then you align with conservatives?
English
English
I mean, these are not hard to Google. publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblc…
Alison Craig@lawandchocolate
@TristinHopper Wrong again! You aren't eligible for ANY parole - day or full (the only two kinds) before 25 years (or 10, in the case of second degree murder). Why can't you just accept that you got this one wrong? A responsible reporter would.
English
@robertstrau67 @TristinHopper Yeah Tristin claiming that lifers get out after 5 years only to then debunk his own claims from the data he decides to cite really makes me consider the integrity of reporters like him.
English
@TristinHopper The destruction of my trust in expertise continues apace
English
@TristinHopper So you admit that your initial tweet, the entire basis of this argument, was just a complete lie then? From the data that you yourself decide to cite? Lmao
English
@MaxontheCoast @lawandchocolate @TristinHopper Tristin claimed that lifers get released after 5 years lmao.
English
@lawandchocolate @TristinHopper Is that a round-about way of saying you're wrong? An apology to follow? You're a lawyer; you should be better than that.
English
@chucknisga @lawandchocolate @TristinHopper The entire argument started in the first place because Tristin claimed that lifers “routinely” get out after 5 years. The very data HE cites contradicts this.
English
@TheCanadianCon @TristinHopper Do you have data that backs up your claims? Because facts don’t care about your feelings sorry buddy
English
@DeplorableNorth @MikeDNolin @TristinHopper No, he is saying within the population of DO’s, only 2% see any form of parole.
English
@MikeDNolin @TristinHopper Are you saying 2% of offenders are DO’d?
English
@TheCanadianCon @TristinHopper CSC data is literally referenced multiple times in the paper lmao, I honestly feel bad for how delusional you people are.
English
@TheCanadianCon @TristinHopper Yes I know you are very afraid of actual data as it completely contradicts the fantasy you want to live in.
English
@TheCanadianCon @TristinHopper You know absolutely nothing about how the criminal system works in Canada. commons.allard.ubc.ca/fac_pubs/692/
English
@Sandra_Cole44 @Diana_C_McNally The vast vast majority of interactions have nothing to do with harmful activity and everything to do with the further criminalization of homelessness in public space. Unhoused people are fined for simply existing or participating in survival tactics like panhandling.
English
@Diana_C_McNally Yes Vancouver Police were wrong in issuing a ticket to he homeless man. But the you & the article don't state what the interaction between homeless & the police was for. Don't assume just because someone is homeless that they can't or haven't committed a crime.
English
In Toronto, approximately 10% of all police interactions with the public are with unhoused people, the collective cost of which — including by processing tickets, 90% of which are never paid — amounts to $100+ million a year. It's an absurd, actively harmful waste of resources.
CTV News Vancouver@CTVVancouver
The decision to ticket a homeless man for having a cart on the sidewalk is drawing criticism from advocates. bc.ctvnews.ca/the-absolute-w…
English
@jenniferelle_ I’m just confused, what policies do you actually support when it comes to housing? You seem to like complaining without advocating for ideas.
English
@MonsieurFranck4 @nytimes It literally means what it means though, defund the police. It’s a very simple premise, no need to complicate things.
English
@nytimes Because “defund the police” was a terrible slogan. Rather than find a new one, ppl would just be like “let me educate you on what it really means!” When you have to explain why your slogan doesn’t mean what it means, you might want to find a new one.
English
Three years after “defund the police” became a rallying cry after the murder of George Floyd, efforts largely fizzled in Minneapolis and beyond after activists failed to build broad support for a movement that lacked a clear definition. nyti.ms/3JktXqZ
English
@tafphorisms @BigPompaPomp Police are the last people who should be empowered when it comes to reducing “crime.” You fundamentally misunderstand leftist arguments when it comes to policing.
English
